dark light

Archer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 1,614 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Germany wants the Queen to apologize for bombing them? #1360055
    Archer
    Participant

    I think there’s little doubt there will come a time, arguably after the living memories are extinguished, when all parties to this insanity apologise to each other.

    So how long should it take before this happens? This would imply that we should start sending out apologies for the period before 1900, and how far back should we go with this? Should I, North European Cave Dweller apologise to a South European Cave Dweller for beating him with a large club and dragging away his favourite female by her hair to my own cave? I personally don’t remember doing this, but I’m sure one of my ancestors has. :rolleyes:

    Indeed you can apologise after a fight, but in those cases the fight will generally have ended by common agreement, and not because one has the other by the throat. A war invariably leaves scars that no apology, however well and truly meant, can heal or even lessen. When people apologise, they usually say: ‘let’s forget about it’. That’s the one thing we cannot and should never do. Any war that has ended is now a part of history, and history is what we have to learn from so we don’t have to repeat it.

    in reply to: Converting to a C172. Any Tips…. #434895
    Archer
    Participant

    DME: what have you flown so far?

    in reply to: Germany wants the Queen to apologize for bombing them? #1361047
    Archer
    Participant

    Hmm, no offense, but if we start that then there are a lot of apologies outstanding worldwide!

    in reply to: RUN RUN RUN AWAY – The World's about to END #1361185
    Archer
    Participant

    Look on the bright side Nick: you would only have to take 6 photos and you’re done for the day! 😀

    in reply to: Cosmetic mods to aircraft #434915
    Archer
    Participant

    Aah, the ‘Hiscock Enigma’. :rolleyes:

    Daz, if you’re talking about Spit look-alike gear doors then it wouldn’t smooth the gear much. When viewed straight from the front it is basically a flat plate which shouldn’t add much drag, but the fittings and the interference will contribute to a higher drag factor! Also when viewed from the side you are adding vertical surface which is ahead of the CofG which may be slightly destabilizing in yaw. To solve that you could end up needing a larger vertical fin. On the other hand the effects may be negligable, but it’s worth considering.

    in reply to: "Oscar" damaged #1361902
    Archer
    Participant
    in reply to: Spitfire 18 TP280 #1363063
    Archer
    Participant

    Dibbo did the great air to air sortie with TP280. Copyright shots I am afraid.

    It would appear from a few tries at a Google image search that one or two of his shots have been online but have since been removed, rightly so it seems! (Now that you mention him, they did appear to be his style of photography)

    in reply to: Cosmetic mods to aircraft #434929
    Archer
    Participant

    Looks like Melvin’s crystal ball is cloudy today, with those answers you would be great as a fortune teller!! 😀

    Daz, the question is would the decrease in drag (assuming it’s a retractable gear!) from the gear doors be enough to offset the increase in weight? I always thought the Isaacs Spit had a fixed gear, in that case it would almost certainly add drag to fit gear doors. I guess you wouldn’t want to see a nice pair of spats on it? 😉

    in reply to: Concorde Petition to Blair #1363305
    Archer
    Participant

    ( I believe there is a bad photo of us in front of the Vulcan on the Forum somewhere )

    Dodgy photo and other Vulcan shots on this thread: http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=24709

    in reply to: Spitfire 18 TP280 #1363453
    Archer
    Participant

    There’s one here: http://www.militaryairshows.net/galld.htm

    And you might also like the ones on this page: http://www.militaryairshows.net/galld2.htm

    This site even has instructions in the status bar, how convenient!! 😀 😀

    in reply to: Historic Engineer required #1363861
    Archer
    Participant

    isn’t there anyone out there that wants to work on vintage aircraft?

    Sure, just move the outfit across the North Sea and I’ll be your man! 😀

    in reply to: EE Lightning…Ideal for a Caption!!! #1383836
    Archer
    Participant

    Darn it! Dropped my marshmellow! 😀

    in reply to: Flying boat at Thorpe Park?? #1386944
    Archer
    Participant

    The only photo I ever saw of the Viking at Thorpe park is on display next to the aircraft, so getting to that might be tricky for me. Also it’s been a while since I looked at it, so whether it had RAF roundels????? I haven’t got a clue I’m afraid!

    in reply to: Flying boat at Thorpe Park?? #1386952
    Archer
    Participant

    Vickers 60 Viking IV (replica) ‘G-EBED’ (BAPC #114).

    Biplane amphibian now at The Brooklands Museum indeed, formerly at Thorpe Park. I think it was taxiable with a Ford automotive engine, damaged during its time at Thorpe IIRC and later restored at Brooklands.

    No photo available from me right now I’m afraid (hidden at home), but I’m sure someone will have one.

    edit: found one on the net: http://www.planepictures.net/netshow.php?id=175028

    in reply to: Spitfire TE184 #1387355
    Archer
    Participant

    I went and looked up some details last night to get the picture straight in my head. Thought I might as well scan and post these:

Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 1,614 total)