The B-25 at Sandtoft (ex-Gorgeous George-Ann) was purchased and moved to Belgium in 2006. As of today, the BAPA is still hard at work restoring the airframe. In comparison, Bedsheet Bomber is most likely in a worse state and therefore a lot lower down the list if you’re looking for a restoration candidate. As mentioned before, the museums interested in the type already have an example or are busy restoring one. Where does that leave this B-25? Looking at a bleak future if you ask me.
Bring on the Eagle-powered one!
Surely you’ll need one on each prop tip, so where are you going to add the other 3kp? π
That’s brilliant! Great idea to have the undercarriage included in the installation, I don’t think I’ve seen that before. Well done!
Oh dear, problems during the air test yesterday perhaps? It is a bit sad that an airframe that flew over specially for this purpose, now has to sit out a second Legends show…
According to my research (looking up the diameters in Wikipedia!)
An R2600 would fit on the Beaufighter firewall perfect!
When I first read this, I thought what about the weight of the engine? What about the length of the engine including accessories? What about a suitable prop for this installation? What about connecting British systems to US generators and pumps? Or British generators and pumps to a US accessory gearbox?
Now I see that someone’s already gone through the trouble of figuring out whether this is possible, judging from Avro Avian’s post above. But that doesn’t mean that it would be easy to reconstruct this modification, even if drawings and such still exist. It would most certainly encompass a very significant modification to the aircraft and you could ask yourself whether you’d rather have a static Beaufighter with the correct engines, or a flying Beaufighter with completely different engines, nacelles and systems. I’m sure that there will be several votes for the second option, but I do hope that large cheques will accompany those votes. π
Yes, but under Experimental registration in the US. The fact that one authority will allow it (with strict limitations) does not mean that others will too. The accident report on the modified P-51 Galloping Ghost that crashed at Reno explains some of the limitations that are in place for experimental racers.
I found this one in the Berlin Technikmuseum in 2014, otherwise I wouldn’t have known it π
RW-3_Berlin by Jelle Hieminga, on Flickr
It’s not a jet, it’s a Rhein RW-3, see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhein_Flugzeugbau_RW_3_Multoplan
From memory he flew the RAFM replica Albatros at Shuttleworth
He did:
Just get two Derwents running, no-one will notice the squeak! π
I see…. I should have left the hyphen out or rephrased that. We got there in the end though! ?
Fournier Boy, have you tried getting in touch with the BAE Systems archive at Farnborough? If it was an official photo, they may have a copy in their collection.
Sabrejet, I suspect that is not an F-100 engine, but a complete Super Sabre: http://www.nelsam.org.uk/NEAM/Exhibits/History/42157.htm
151632 Gorgeous George Ann / Thar She Blows B-25J-30NC 44-30925 N9494Z Brussels Air Museum
151645 Marvellous Miriam B-25J-20NC 44-29366 N9115Z RAF Museum Hendon
151790 Amazing Andrea B-25J-30NC 44-86701 N7681C Destroyed β Hangar Fire
151863 Big Bad Bonnie B-25J-30NC 44-86843 N9455Z Grissom Air Museum
151724 Brendaβs Boys B-25J-20NC 44-29121 N86427 Museo del Aire, Madrid, Spain
I just had a quick look at the Warbird Registry entries for these aircraft and noticed that 44-86843 is not listed as having been used in Hanover Street. It also lists a different N-number for this airframe (N3507G instead of N9455Z). I guess that may just be an incomplete entry in the registry, or are we mixing up Mitchells?
If I look at N9455Z in the FAA database, this appears to be 44-30210, not 44-86843. That means that the list posted by Propstrike in post #2 should be amended as follows:
151863 Big Bad Bonnie B-25J-30NC 44-30210 N9455Z Tulsa, OK.