Something you have to see to understand Belgium:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ceg6NQKHd70

Short answer: no.
You are talking about Belgium here. Probably the least aviation-minded country in Europe.

Where they just decided to close the last airport in my county.
Where I have to drive to the Netherlands (as in Holland, another country!) to find the nearest gliding field. (Gliding was forbidden at my now (closing) nearest airfield because it made too much noise(!) for the birds.)
Where most regional airports constantly face lawsuits or are in danger of losing their license.
Where two language groups are constantly fighting against each other, making anything on a national level (like Zaventem national airport) a nightmare to govern.

To sum it up, most people rather see aviation go away over here then support it. If something like a Duxford should open here, I’m sure it’s license would be withdrawn within a year. That is if they could get one in the first place!

I would like to see them keep the foreign aircraft that have a connection to the Belgian Air force or Belgium. This includes said MiG-21, WWII aircraft,… However, there are some aircraft that have no connection at all to Belgium in the collection. Aircraft that were given to them and are there just because they have them. These are taking up space for relevant airframes that are now in storage.
I think every museum needs a clear collecting policy. You can’t collect and display everything. Keep in mind that this is the official museum of the Belgian armed forces. I don’t see the RAF museum displaying a Belgian Fouga, Swedish Saab or Hungarian Hind?

They DO need to sell some of the non Belgian collection. They need the space for Belgian aircraft that are now in storage. It bugs me too see foreign aircraft that have nothing to do with our country in the museum.
Ouragan? G-91? Delfin? Draken? Vampire? Be gone!
I can understand a MiG-21 as it’s what we were up against in the cold war. They have a HUGE museum reserve that deserves to be displayed.

Graham,
I’d be interested to hear why you prefer using Quark instead of InDesign? I’ve used both in the past and gladly dumped Quark for the later!

LOL, Surprised there is someone left on this world that’s using Quark!:p
I wouldn’t go digital. It’s too limited in reach. As you say, you can read a book whenever/wherever you want. Plus once you sold a digital copy, who knows where it will end up? One can make millions of illegal copies.
Can’t you thread stitch them instead of staples? Or is that what you mean that can’t be done?

I feel really uncomfortable seeing that image. Nothing worn as protective clothing, no helmet,.. An accident waiting to happen if you ask me!

Are you children finished giggling about the fact that Hillary Swank has breasts?

²