And Korea
I like this because you are wrong – it can take off. (you can argue all you like)
THINK! Its jet powered – engines on an aircraft would push against the air, not the conveyor belt… Ill let you think it over before I explain.
Ill assume you have given up argueing as you have finally realised you are wrong. (or you mummy says your have to come off now :rolleyes: )
Yes, I found it eventually. Im glad no-one was hurt, but its one less SAR helicopter in the sky.
Its a shame because they do such a good job. I can’t find the post.
Its cool, but not as cool as the Harrier. I can’t believe the US backed out of the deal to have British engines in it. B4$T4RD$ 😡
leave bob909 alone. How can you accuse Israel of illegally owning nukes when the USA has hundreds, and often starts illegal wars, or bombs friendly countries illegally.
Hmmm, perhaps? When I say old cars I mean absolutely trashed cars. And the boats been there years, kinda makes me curious.
Are you still here? I would have thought you would have crawled away now that playtimes over. The fact still stands that the Eurofighter is more manueverable over mach 1, and so much faster.
wow, look at the straight lines on the grass. I wish my lawnmower would make my grass look like that.
I do speak seriously, what I am saying is correct – check your facts. I just don’t like you because you are a troll.
No actually the full weapons load includes external hardpoints. Get your facts right before you ingage in an arguement you can’t win. The Eurofighter has better supercruise and a higher “top speed” than the F-22 and is more manueverable at high speeds.
Russian stuff better than you think.
Good choice of aircraft. Sure beats any other ones that countries are currently developing.
Its a tough call but remember that the Eurofighter has a speed and manueverabilty advantage – the only bad thing is that its not stealthy, but with a full load of weapons niether is the F-22