????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Erm….what’s the purpose of this photo??? F-5s have been in Taiwanese service for a long long time. I just don’t understand the point of posting this…

The “Falklands” or Las Malvinas belong to Argentina…fukk knows how Britains thinks that a land 9,000 miles away should be British…harks back to the old “make the world England” routine from centuries past.

Hey dumb as “Brits” in Las Malvinas…GTFO…

I believe Yak did,the Yak-24 NATO called it “Horse”. It was developed in the early 1950’s and served into 1960’s, had a fair service length but nothing really special. The Mi-4 was more succesful

not yet, but they were parked neatly alongside each other making things quite easy. apparently there is question as to how those responsible managed to get passed the guards.

Why would they be withdrawn? They are a valuable strike asset to any air force. They have been seen flying in recent parades, as many people here would say “Google is your friend”

I still do not understand why they are going ahead with both Mi-28 and Ka-52, they may have some slight advantage and disadvantage in some areas, but its not good enough reason to justify two attack helicopters unless Russia was trying to subsidize both companies to keep them busy. Just like how the US doesn’t really need both AH-1Z and AH-64

You make it sound like this is a bad thing, I wish more countries would support htere industries by taking such action. I say fair play to them if that is the reason!

Every month this seems to happen, what is wrong here?

I’m still waiting for the Death Star to appear on Iranian news as their new wonder weapon :dev2: