dark light

Propstrike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 3,488 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sahara P40 #914684
    Propstrike
    Participant

    ”If the group that recovered this airframe hadn’t …” But they did.

    ”If the moon was made of cheese………..” But it isn’t.

    Speaking personally, I hope to go to Hendon, see it perched on a pile of rocks ( or some imaginative diorama ) and I will breathe a sigh of relief that it was not turned into saucepans.

    in reply to: Sahara P40 #914791
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I understand the appeal in sometimes taking an anti group- think contrarian position, but really, what a load of cobblers !

    There is no widespread appetite or merit in tearing apart this airframe, and using its DNA in a flyable reconstruction. Almost nobody promotes this stupid notion , so why bother constructing such a spurious case ?

    It’s very boring. Did I mention stupid.

    in reply to: Sahara P40 #915554
    Propstrike
    Participant

    The point has been made before, but it is worth repeating, that the Kittyhawk ( as found ) is compelling and fascinating because it tells a story of human endeavour and tragedy.

    To restore it in anyway, removes forever the very qualities which make it significant. I hope it is left untouched, and displayed sympathetically, and that it is able to serve a more useful purpose than that other desert relic, the ‘Lady Be Good” (B-24 Liberator)

    in reply to: Sahara P40 #915733
    Propstrike
    Participant

    John, I think you’re pretty much on your own on this one:o

    You are alone in your dug-out, the opposition is massing, and you are running out of ammunition !

    I am not at all the kind of person to to go on a public forum, and state that you are simply wrong.
    But I am certainly thinking it! :eagerness:

    in reply to: Sahara P40 #916046
    Propstrike
    Participant

    In fairness SeaDog HAS achieved more, in practical terms, than many (most ?) forum members, to actually get historic aircraft into the air.

    If that happens to give you, me, or any of us some sort of Status Anxiety, well, that’s just too bad.

    Time for those broad shoulders 🙂

    Great video here of the aeroplane pre-recovery. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OWPg5FLh8o

    in reply to: Sahara P40 #916059
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I know that the P40 has many devotees and supporters but, to equate this airframes importance to that of the Spitfire in question is surely ludicrous. We’re not short of either aircraft but, to my mind one simply cannot have too many Spitfires.

    I had to re-read this to see if it was meant to be ironic.

    You really think a stripped out late mark Spitfire hulk is of greater value than the lost-in-time Kittyhawk ? I think you CAN have too may Spitfires if their furtherment is at the expense of other types.

    This is not just any old P.40 , and the publicity it generates is an indication of widespread public fascination. I would not cross the road to look at the gutted Spit, but would go a long way to see the P.40, and look forward to having the chance.

    in reply to: Sahara P40 #916161
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Thanks for breaking cover, Pat.

    Clarity takes us a lot closer to understanding.

    in reply to: Sahara P40 #916173
    Propstrike
    Participant

    C’mon, use your imagination. 🙂

    It takes too long beating round the bushes..

    in reply to: Sahara P40 #916295
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Maybe this would be a good time for SeaDog to set aside his anonymity and say who he is and how he knows what he knows, if that does not make him too uncomfortable.

    It could underline his credibility and reinforce assurances as to the well-being of the salvaged P.40

    Most of the hot-air generated here and on other forums is a consequence of an absence of knowledge.

    in reply to: WHEN will avgas prices reflect the falling cost of oil ? #384183
    Propstrike
    Participant

    This is more like it.

    ”Down again for February. With effect from Sunday (1st Feb) Gloucester’s 100LL will be £1.39 inc. VAT, which is 49 pence per litre cheaper than it was this time last year. ”

    http://forums.flyer.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=93092&start=75

    in reply to: Sahara P40 #918011
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Some ‘aircraft historian ‘ Pat Chiswick ( who he ? ) is pretty forthright in his criticism in the Telegraph article.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/11377178/RAF-Museum-handed-over-Spitfire-in-ill-conceived-deal-for-WWII-aircraft-it-may-never-receive.html

    ”The exchange was ill-conceived and badly managed. The RAF Museum has nothing to show for it and the nation has lost a perfectly good and valuable Spitfire.”

    Maybe. Maybe not. In is an unfortunate and sad tale from start to finish (so far ) but I guess it is not good news copy without accusations flying and fingers pointed.

    in reply to: AB910 – Engine Runs at Duxford! #918032
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Can it be test flown by ARC, or are only BBMF crew approved to operate it ?

    in reply to: Airco DH6 #922169
    Propstrike
    Participant

    The Scout Group in Chesham Bois (Amersham) built an SE5. Its a bit droopy , but not bad at all.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzeWIcZqyiw

    in reply to: Shackleton WB833, Mull of Kintyre #923100
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Sounds like a lucky escape, Rex. Sorry you were not properly welcomed last August, but you are now !

    Hope the book is going well for you.

    Do you have any photos you feel like posting ?

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #923109
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I saw a Mustang racing past Bovingdon at 3pm, heading DX direction, so that makes sense.

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 3,488 total)