Hi Rich,
Thanks for posting. Welcome to the forum.
All I am saying is that the Canadians do not deserve UK Government funding for their engine, as their little venture wasn’t exactly inclusive.
Enjoyed by countless English people. And, by your reckoning, I should have taken time off work and ponied up the cash to go down to the home counties to go to one of the villiage fetes the Lancs were turning up at.
The Canadians travelled 4000 miles and spent a boat load of cash to come here, so yes, I absolutely think you should have taken time off work, and spent a few quid and maybe gone a couple of hundred miles to see the it. Edinburgh to Luton is just 50 mins, or, to put it another way, actually barely a third the running time of ‘Braveheart’ ! 🙂
”common sense NOT to waste money on that Merlin as part of a project that was limited in scope by the stunted parochial little-englander attitude of too many within the warplane movement. As a Scot I can safely say it was our war too.”
I think you are way out of line. You claim to have disdain for politicisation, yet that is precisely what you have brought to this thread. As a Scot I can safely say your personal prejudices are of minimal interest to anyone here.
I can’t help remembering that Scotland had its own Lancaster for many years, but the museum closed and the aircraft sold off as low visitor numbers made the enterprise untenable.
The Canadian visit was a towering success, and was enjoyed by countless people. Maybe you should have made a bit more effort.
Is latest Aeroplane out ?
I have run an advert for the Historic Aircraft assoc event at Hendon, and need to know it is out there.
‘, what is the translation of ‘ToC’ some year and a half before final airframe erection?
Is it ‘Taken on charge’ ie accepted ..?
I understand your principle.
Years ago I never felt the need ,for instance, to write to the RAF museum at Hendon saying ‘ I love the way you have the lights on so that I can see stuff”
That would be in the pre-gloom era, needless to say.
I don’t think we need any new titles, but just moderate the ones which we have so that they do not make your eyes hurt.
Looking at the current issue, I was reminded again why I find FlyPast so hard to read, and buy.
The layout is just too damn frantic, and the designer has found 50 ways to mess up what would have been perfectly attractive photos, overlaying with text, ghosting other images on top, or behind. The ‘design’ is far too self-conscious. Sometimes (most times) just words and pictures is fine. The only picture unmolested was of Norman Tebbit asleep in his study! Yet a nice air-to air of a Mustang is cropped to death.
I suspect that all the components (ghastly fonts, dodgy artwork. free floating boxes of text, over-cropped photos ) are rammed into a blunderbuss, and fired at the blank page. There is no other explaination.
Somehow, it does not feel like a journal for grown-ups.
It can very likely be put in a jig and a few tubes replaced ! It doesn’t look very extreme compared to what is fixed out in the U.S.
Indeed. things are a bit different there. We, for instance, don’t often have our aeroplanes eaten by a bear, and have to fix them ‘in the field’ with duct tape !
To a degree, it is a numbers game. There are over 700 at Waltham members and a LOT of movements.
Being arguably the epicentre of UK aerobatics, with practices in the overhead, and a high proportion of vintage aircraft, which are not difficult but different, a number of dings and dongs are going to occur.
There can be few GA airfields with comparable activity.
As to the history of the aeroplane, teaching tail-wheel flying to tyros is not always plain sailing. Look at the whacks and wallops that both Clacton Aero Club and the Tiger Club have experienced whilst undertaking this training. It is rare for anyone to be hurt, but the aeroplanes sometimes have a bit of a rough time.
Someone must have known its was there or the engine would still be on the front.
I suggest that is by no means certain. The engine bearers are the part most liable to corrode and fail, as they are still under significant load. A bit of tidal movement over 70 years could easily shift the airframe some distance from the engine. Or perhaps a trawler pulled it off.
Anyway, I hope they can salvage it.
Someone’s got to post a picture.. Certainly looks good.
Thanks for the memory- safe journey
And that just sucks.
The enthusiast-orientated magazine sector might well have some sort of a future, but it may be rather a short one.
The traditional magazine-buying generation is dying off, and there is no sign that younger consumers are going to acquire the habit. There is no scenario that I can envisage which does not encompass an inexorable decline.
Bring back Control Column ! The original, and the best, and with cryptic photographs so black and blurred even the M15 Photo-Intelligence Unit would be scratching their heads :rolleyes:
All the usual suspects were there. – Ellis, Saunders, Arnold, Badham, Filmore……….etc etc .
2 Lancasters – Derwent Valley: http://youtu.be/BlJ4htNDoHI
Great video. On board Go-Pros on each a/c . This is the sort of ‘reporting’ that make the monthly mags seem so 20th century.