dark light

Propstrike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 3,488 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Canadian Warplane Heritage – Lancaster- 2014 UK tour #854332
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Hi Rich,

    Thanks for posting. Welcome to the forum.

    in reply to: Season Highs & Lows #855390
    Propstrike
    Participant

    All I am saying is that the Canadians do not deserve UK Government funding for their engine, as their little venture wasn’t exactly inclusive.

    Enjoyed by countless English people. And, by your reckoning, I should have taken time off work and ponied up the cash to go down to the home counties to go to one of the villiage fetes the Lancs were turning up at.

    The Canadians travelled 4000 miles and spent a boat load of cash to come here, so yes, I absolutely think you should have taken time off work, and spent a few quid and maybe gone a couple of hundred miles to see the it. Edinburgh to Luton is just 50 mins, or, to put it another way, actually barely a third the running time of ‘Braveheart’ ! 🙂

    in reply to: Season Highs & Lows #855505
    Propstrike
    Participant

    ”common sense NOT to waste money on that Merlin as part of a project that was limited in scope by the stunted parochial little-englander attitude of too many within the warplane movement. As a Scot I can safely say it was our war too.”

    I think you are way out of line. You claim to have disdain for politicisation, yet that is precisely what you have brought to this thread. As a Scot I can safely say your personal prejudices are of minimal interest to anyone here.

    I can’t help remembering that Scotland had its own Lancaster for many years, but the museum closed and the aircraft sold off as low visitor numbers made the enterprise untenable.

    The Canadian visit was a towering success, and was enjoyed by countless people. Maybe you should have made a bit more effort.

    in reply to: Can We Mention 'Aeroplane Monthly' Now Then? #856174
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Is latest Aeroplane out ?

    I have run an advert for the Historic Aircraft assoc event at Hendon, and need to know it is out there.

    in reply to: Tiger Moth DF112 / G-ANRM #856805
    Propstrike
    Participant

    ‘, what is the translation of ‘ToC’ some year and a half before final airframe erection?

    Is it ‘Taken on charge’ ie accepted ..?

    in reply to: Can We Mention 'Aeroplane Monthly' Now Then? #860034
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I understand your principle.

    Years ago I never felt the need ,for instance, to write to the RAF museum at Hendon saying ‘ I love the way you have the lights on so that I can see stuff”

    That would be in the pre-gloom era, needless to say.

    I don’t think we need any new titles, but just moderate the ones which we have so that they do not make your eyes hurt.

    in reply to: Can We Mention 'Aeroplane Monthly' Now Then? #860476
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Looking at the current issue, I was reminded again why I find FlyPast so hard to read, and buy.

    The layout is just too damn frantic, and the designer has found 50 ways to mess up what would have been perfectly attractive photos, overlaying with text, ghosting other images on top, or behind. The ‘design’ is far too self-conscious. Sometimes (most times) just words and pictures is fine. The only picture unmolested was of Norman Tebbit asleep in his study! Yet a nice air-to air of a Mustang is cropped to death.

    I suspect that all the components (ghastly fonts, dodgy artwork. free floating boxes of text, over-cropped photos ) are rammed into a blunderbuss, and fired at the blank page. There is no other explaination.

    Somehow, it does not feel like a journal for grown-ups.

    in reply to: Super Cub written off at White Waltham #385376
    Propstrike
    Participant

    It can very likely be put in a jig and a few tubes replaced ! It doesn’t look very extreme compared to what is fixed out in the U.S.

    Indeed. things are a bit different there. We, for instance, don’t often have our aeroplanes eaten by a bear, and have to fix them ‘in the field’ with duct tape !

    in reply to: Super Cub written off at White Waltham #385428
    Propstrike
    Participant

    To a degree, it is a numbers game. There are over 700 at Waltham members and a LOT of movements.

    Being arguably the epicentre of UK aerobatics, with practices in the overhead, and a high proportion of vintage aircraft, which are not difficult but different, a number of dings and dongs are going to occur.

    There can be few GA airfields with comparable activity.

    As to the history of the aeroplane, teaching tail-wheel flying to tyros is not always plain sailing. Look at the whacks and wallops that both Clacton Aero Club and the Tiger Club have experienced whilst undertaking this training. It is rare for anyone to be hurt, but the aeroplanes sometimes have a bit of a rough time.

    in reply to: Ju 87 R-2 Stuka wreck found in the Adriatic #864484
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Someone must have known its was there or the engine would still be on the front.

    I suggest that is by no means certain. The engine bearers are the part most liable to corrode and fail, as they are still under significant load. A bit of tidal movement over 70 years could easily shift the airframe some distance from the engine. Or perhaps a trawler pulled it off.

    Anyway, I hope they can salvage it.

    in reply to: Kent Battle of Britain Museum acquire the BPA Defiant. #866208
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Someone’s got to post a picture.. Certainly looks good.

    in reply to: Canadian Warplane Heritage – Lancaster- 2014 UK tour #867992
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Thanks for the memory- safe journey

    in reply to: Can We Mention 'Aeroplane Monthly' Now Then? #869095
    Propstrike
    Participant

    And that just sucks.

    The enthusiast-orientated magazine sector might well have some sort of a future, but it may be rather a short one.

    The traditional magazine-buying generation is dying off, and there is no sign that younger consumers are going to acquire the habit. There is no scenario that I can envisage which does not encompass an inexorable decline.

    in reply to: Can We Mention 'Aeroplane Monthly' Now Then? #870438
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Bring back Control Column ! The original, and the best, and with cryptic photographs so black and blurred even the M15 Photo-Intelligence Unit would be scratching their heads :rolleyes:

    All the usual suspects were there. – Ellis, Saunders, Arnold, Badham, Filmore……….etc etc .

    in reply to: Canadian Warplane Heritage – Lancaster- 2014 UK tour #872173
    Propstrike
    Participant

    2 Lancasters – Derwent Valley: http://youtu.be/BlJ4htNDoHI

    Great video. On board Go-Pros on each a/c . This is the sort of ‘reporting’ that make the monthly mags seem so 20th century.

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 3,488 total)