Page 100 – Key Publishing

philgatwick05

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 1,766 total)

← 1 2 3 … 99 100 101 … 116 117 118 →

Author

Posts
March 6, 2006 at 10:22 pm in reply to: Post your FS screenshots here! #1610536

philgatwick05
Participant

That’s one long plane 🙂

March 6, 2006 at 10:22 pm in reply to: Post your FS screenshots here! #1614384

philgatwick05
Participant

That’s one long plane 🙂

March 6, 2006 at 10:16 pm in reply to: Flybe – news? #609384

philgatwick05
Participant

i read in the Airliner world today that flybe in october will be having the embrear 195’s slowly being deliverd!! im sure happey becasue i will be able go further from a small airport!!!

……….and? :confused:

😀 😀

March 6, 2006 at 10:15 pm in reply to: Prestwick photos Monday 06-03-06 #609390

philgatwick05
Participant

Nice shots – always good to see something a bit different!

March 6, 2006 at 10:10 pm in reply to: Terminal 5 (Merged) #609392

philgatwick05
Participant

i have just looked up about if ba will go ahead and order the A380 it says on this website a little bit on info on what ba will do Click here

Well if you want real speculation I’d recommed airliners.net :D. We can discuss till the cows come home but BA hardly splash their details across the web, do they :D:D

March 6, 2006 at 10:06 pm in reply to: Terminal 5 (Merged) #609397

philgatwick05
Participant

I really don’t know where they got that from ba i wolud’nt think be that nasty becasue T5 is being bulit to accomodate the A380, anyway ba have got terminals t1 t2 t3 t4 and that has’nt been a hasle for them, i could never think of ba being selfish to outher airlines

Yes but it’s not quite that simple – T5 always was and is about BA’s own terminal with all their operations under one roof. As Gonzo rightly said and I’ve said before in this thread to accomodate BA + Partners in 1 terminal would require something at least 50% bigger than T5 will be. It’s not about them being selfish it’s just a question of capacity restraints.

March 6, 2006 at 7:36 pm in reply to: British Airways: London Heathrow to Paris CDG #416007

philgatwick05
Participant

Nice report there – well worth taking the time to read.

March 6, 2006 at 7:33 pm in reply to: Post your FS screenshots here! #1610542

philgatwick05
Participant

nice shots there adam

March 6, 2006 at 7:33 pm in reply to: Post your FS screenshots here! #1614391

philgatwick05
Participant

nice shots there adam

March 6, 2006 at 7:32 pm in reply to: Some pics from a still cold DUS #609553

philgatwick05
Participant

Excellent photos there 😀

March 6, 2006 at 7:31 pm in reply to: More LBA Sun! 6/3/06 #609556

philgatwick05
Participant

Nice shots there – how many aircraft do bmi base at LBA?

March 6, 2006 at 7:29 pm in reply to: Terminal 5 (Merged) #609563

philgatwick05
Participant

its taken me a fw years to work out what airlines serve which terminal at LHR as an enthusiast…this is gonna bugga up my work completely 😡 😀

lol 🙂 😀 😀

March 6, 2006 at 6:45 pm in reply to: Spotting-photos from Norway #609637

philgatwick05
Participant

Really good shots – nice to see a friendly pilot there!

March 6, 2006 at 6:43 pm in reply to: Terminal 5 (Merged) #609641

philgatwick05
Participant

I work for BAA and “on the grapevine” T2 will be demolished. It is desparate need of work and BAA are unwilling to spend the vast sums of money needed. Not sure if I am 100% but I think T2 is the original 1st Terminal of Heathrow. Anyway T5 is a magnificent building and I am looking forward to seeing it open.

Lots of people knock Heathrow, but I love it… like a city in itself. 😉

I’m with you on that one 🙂

Yep – T2 was originally the first terminal at LHR – I too was under the impression that it was being left dormant for demolition but some have said on this thread that Star may use it – even though I’m pretty confident T1 would be big enough…

btw I’d envy your job!

March 6, 2006 at 5:22 pm in reply to: Suggestion to Microsoft #228839

philgatwick05
Participant

yes, they must surely do that. they will do that in order to attract the largest possible audiences, therefore making more money. they can’t and won’t aim one of the best selling computer games in history at purely those with the latest hardware.

IN theory the OS itself isn’t the crucial part – most MS games will be backwards compatible – it’s more about having the hardware to run FS with decent realism – you may be able to run FS06 on Windows ME but if you’ve only got for example 128mb ram and a crappy video card you may think what’s the point :rolleyes:
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 1,766 total)

← 1 2 3 … 99 100 101 … 116 117 118 →