dark light

Snoopy7422

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 761 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Favourite aviation film moments #1074797
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Here’s a couple….

    There was a super documentary made in about 1979, called ‘B25 Mitchells Do Fly IMC’. No cheesy heroics, but plenty of REAL flying. Most of these a/c were, of course, veterans of ‘Catch 22’. It was about the crossing of the Pond by about half a dozen for the making of the film ‘Hanover Street’, starring Harrison Ford. There was a real wartime pilot, I think named Parish, along for the trip, and the pilots, as well as the Usual Suspects at that time, included John ‘Jeff’ Hawk, bless him. They were all together for a mass take-off, I think at Goose, when there were some burst tyres and crazy taxiing….! They ended-up splitting into two groups, one took the shorter (Colder) northerly route, and JH taking the the southern (Warmer) route via Madeira etc. There is some magical footage of them in formation through broken cloud to Fleetwood Mac’s ‘Albatross’. This was all an amazing effort, especially as some of the a/c were pretty rough. JH’s advice to all and sundry to ‘Baby them (The old a/c.) along’, has always stayed with me when flying old a/c……! All the a/c were named, and some stayed in the UK, at least for a while… “Laiden Maiden’…..et al. I believe Parish passed away before the documentary went onto release.( JH ended-up on the bottom of the Med’ in, er, unusual circumstances.) If you can watch it without feeling a very warm glow inside, you ain’t alive. 🙂
    .
    The other one that strings to mind, is the supposed ‘combat’ in 633 Squadron. There is some footage at altitude, and you can see the vapour-streams off the wingtips of the Mossies as they reef into some hard turns…..oh to see THAT today…….!!! :diablo:

    in reply to: Mustang/Skyraider collision on Channel 5 #1075960
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    .ooOoops..

    On the subject of quick thinking, the Skyraider pilot did amazingly well to complete a roll with half of the starboard wing missing and then recover to a safe landing. Lucky that the aileron didn’t detach. I can’t work out why he caught BBD up so quickly after the 2 second break.

    Such ‘breaks’ have traditionally been used to bleed-off energy to get down to gear limit speeds etc. If they were indeed about to land, One must presume that the Skyraider wasn’t slowing down so quickly, so he needn’t have been actually accelerating. Not a big problem if he’d have held his turn outside the Mustang. Pulling inside, he probably lost sight of it. **** happens, but they guys were all OK, which is the main thing.

    in reply to: Mustang/Skyraider collision on Channel 5 #1076163
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Damned close….

    …..every time I watch that video, I’m amazed. It’s as close a close call as one will see. A very high anal pucker factor….:eek:

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #1077483
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Good for a laugh.

    “THIS IS TOTALY NOT RUNNING!!!!
    WILL NEED A TOTAL REBUILD”

    He’s not kidding either!

    It’s not a Gipsy Six. It’s half an engine and what’s there is basically just scrap – I’ve scrapped better ones than that. Crazy.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Tornados in WW3 #1078770
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    ?

    I’m not a great jet fan, and know little of what you speak, but that won’t stop me suggesting that the Tornado would have been the Blenheim of WW3. Rubbish, but the best we had at the start.

    Moggy

    …and it won’t stop me suggesting that there is NO comparison.

    in reply to: Muppet threw away Spit XIV kit bits! #220383
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Phhhhttt….

    Isn’t there already a dedicated section for models…..?

    in reply to: Dangerous Moonlight #1081476
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    They Got It Right…!

    Years ago, like a lot of folks, I tended to dismiss some of the older B&W stuff. Strangely, much of the colour stuff shot later now seems more dated. A few years ago, I’d recently re-watched the original Dambusters. A few days later, I was watching the attacks on Baghdad, filmed by news-crews live, both with normal cameras and with Infra-Red. I was immediately struck by how superb some of the effects were in the Dambusterss, even allowing for it’s vintage….!!!

    in reply to: Lysanders in Lederhosen….. #1082985
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Ah…

    Hi
    might be worth joining LEMB and asking the experts on the board.
    cheers
    Jerry

    Captured Westland Lysander thread

    http://www.luftwaffe-experten.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=1149

    Thanks for that…it looks as though they are already on the case…I’ll join tomorrow…!

    in reply to: MOD considers selling RAF Northolt #1084611
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Baffled.

    I have always been rather baffled by the mindset of some architects. Some seem to have an overweening desire to stamp their name which overrides common-sense and good taste. In Birmingham, next to the preserved Moor Street Station – which is actually a splendid project, there has been permitted the latest – at least the third encarnantion of the Bull Ring. This resembles a vast, ugly turd, embellished with little shiny disks. It is perfectly ghastly. Why such vanity designs are allowed to creep onto aerodromes I don’t know, when it’s obvious that a hangar, or version thereof, is both efficacious and blends well with the environment. Plucking a historical design off the shelf migh also save a lot of wasted fees as well….:diablo:

    in reply to: Help wanted with parts for DH88 Comet #1087014
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Same but different…?

    Ken,
    Other than part number, can you see any difference between the Proctor and the Heron spinners….? :confused:

    in reply to: Proposed Mossie rebuild in uk – discussion #1019051
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Jigs.

    And have UK CAA approval for use?

    In fairness, the CAA, or EASA, concern themselves with the Airworthiness issue, not workshop equipment which doesn’t fly. As long as a hole etc is the right size and in the right location, there’s no issue. After suitable analysis, it might be possible to simplify some aspects of jigging, but Graham is perfectly correct in highlighting the jigging issue. Everything had to be interchangeable, so everything had to be jigged. In the end, Mosquitos were churned-out at quite a rate. I think Airspeeds alone built ten a week. Many wooden assemblies were farmed-out to furniture factories, – a tribute to the well thought-out jigging.

    One final thought…..given the immense effort required to reproduce what is a high-performance a/c, it would seem totally illogical to only produce one…… IF there were sufficient interested parties – prepared to commit financially…it’d go a long way to making the financial side look a bit more realistic….

    in reply to: Proposed Mossie rebuild in uk – discussion #1027897
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Jigs.

    And have UK CAA approval for use?

    In fairness, the CAA, or EASA, concern themselves with the Airworthiness issue, not workshop equipment which doesn’t fly. As long as a hole etc is the right size and in the right location, there’s no issue. After suitable analysis, it might be possible to simplify some aspects of jigging, but Graham is perfectly correct in highlighting the jigging issue. Everything had to be interchangeable, so everything had to be jigged. In the end, Mosquitos were churned-out at quite a rate. I think Airspeeds alone built ten a week. Many wooden assemblies were farmed-out to furniture factories, – a tribute to the well thought-out jigging.

    One final thought…..given the immense effort required to reproduce what is a high-performance a/c, it would seem totally illogical to only produce one…… IF there were sufficient interested parties – prepared to commit financially…it’d go a long way to making the financial side look a bit more realistic….

    in reply to: Proposed Mossie rebuild in uk – discussion #1019062
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Digression.

    So you dont think there were new tail units manufactured for the Proctuka’s-It would have been easier than modifying a Proctor tail

    Not wishing to pursue this on this thread (Start a separate thread if you wish to pursue this one…:) ) but there was only one ‘Proctuka’. It flew horribly (Possibly only once..!) and, as far as anyone is aware, it never even left Lands End where Viv built most of his replicas. Whether the tail-unit retained some parts we’ll probably never know, but it certainly looked like a Stukas, so was probably mostly new. A new/revised c/s was built to add the required crank and the cockpit area was heavily modified to resemble a Stuka too. At a glance, with it’s final paint-job, it was…..:p…..OK-ish. Had it flown safely, I’m sure it’d have been used. Whether the other Proctors which were never converted ended-up at Borehamwood Studios I have no idea, but I have several other photos of Proctor parts at Borehamwood buried somewhere.

    in reply to: Proposed Mossie rebuild in uk – discussion #1027910
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Digression.

    So you dont think there were new tail units manufactured for the Proctuka’s-It would have been easier than modifying a Proctor tail

    Not wishing to pursue this on this thread (Start a separate thread if you wish to pursue this one…:) ) but there was only one ‘Proctuka’. It flew horribly (Possibly only once..!) and, as far as anyone is aware, it never even left Lands End where Viv built most of his replicas. Whether the tail-unit retained some parts we’ll probably never know, but it certainly looked like a Stukas, so was probably mostly new. A new/revised c/s was built to add the required crank and the cockpit area was heavily modified to resemble a Stuka too. At a glance, with it’s final paint-job, it was…..:p…..OK-ish. Had it flown safely, I’m sure it’d have been used. Whether the other Proctors which were never converted ended-up at Borehamwood Studios I have no idea, but I have several other photos of Proctor parts at Borehamwood buried somewhere.

    in reply to: Proposed Mossie rebuild in uk – discussion #1019266
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Looks like the remains of a ‘Proctuka’ -G-AIEY is the best known but there were two others -the fin and rudder assembly looks Proctor too!

    It’s not Viv’s dreaded ‘Proctuka’, as the angles are wrong. I presumed the tail-surface in the background was the tip of a Mosquito tailplane, but looking at it again you may well be correct…..
    A lot of stuff was lurking around even up until as late as the 1970’s. I was offered about four containers crammed full of Mosquito spares in the early 1980’s, but at the time I had no suitable storage, and I recall it all went to the USA. I was very sorely tempted I do know. Merlins, radiators et al, and not corroded junk either. Of more interest to this thread, I do recall that when the Strathallan B35 was sold to Kermit Weeks, it went for what was – even then – a pittance….my memory may be fooling me, but it wasn’t much more than £100,000, I was very sorry to see it go, but at least it was nice to know it was in safe hands.

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 761 total)