dark light

Cherry Ripe

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 480 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hangar 11 Airframes For Sale #883960
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    His toy box, his toys. He shouldn’t feel the need to justify his decision in any way.

    Well indeed, but I think we’re still allowed to ask amongst ourselves “why is he selling a P-40 and Hurricane for another Spit?”

    There are only at most three dozen airworthy P-40s in the World; even the Hangar 11 website calls it ‘rare’. I can’t wrap my brain around why you’d want to sell it; must be a treasure for air show bookings.

    Perhaps parts are expensive. I suppose it could be something as mundane as that.

    in reply to: More from AAIB on Shoreham #883962
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    I’m intrigued by the comment that the cartridges are only allowed to be installed for two years, yet their shelf life is six. What happens when they are in the aircraft that shortens their life?

    Vibration, g, temperature, humidity, pressure, acoustics; particularly repeated cycling of these.

    Two years is a play-it-safe guesstimate by the manufacturer; military operators usually have guidelines that determine a service lifetime once installed.

    Some stores-ejection carts have to be discarded a month after installation if not used, due to the above factors. Seat carts presumably fare better, being internal.

    in reply to: Midair Squadron in receivership #893616
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Extremely sad news but reflects the increasing costs of maintaining flying 1960s aircraft, I presume. What happened to Misdemeanour – did Jonathon Whaley sell her?

    I think it reflects more the complete absence of income for Mid Air Squadron in 2015. Cancelling an entire display season because of paperwork that could have been done over Winter 2014? Not sure how they expected to pay Β£90,000 in rent to Kemble in that case.

    Misdemeanour has not had her title transferred from Mr Whaley’s company and her PtF expired in October. Looking like an export prospect now, unfortunately.

    in reply to: VTTS & The People's Mosquito #911291
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    With all of the flak that VTTS have been subject to over the years from keyboard warriors (some maybe justifiable, most not) no-one can deny they haven’t “delivered” against the odds.

    VTTS didn’t deliver against the odds, Marshall Aerospace did.

    This time they’ll have to do it without the expertise of the UK’s biggest aircraft engineering firm.

    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    er, having French Guyana, why would they operate feom Senegal?

    French Guyana to Falklands: 8,700 km around the hump of Brazil

    Senegal to Falklands: 8,500 km across open ocean

    Plus to have reached French Guyana in the first place would require a full Atlantic crossing ( how are you going to send Transalls with urgent cargo? Via Senegal?! ), followed by heading halfway back across the ocean just to turn south…

    Senegal provides shorter lines-of-communication back to France, proximity to deployable French forces stationed in Africa and less antagonism to South American countries.

    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    the french are more accustomed to surrender colonies,
    i dont think they would make a fuss of it

    Can you name a post-war colony that the French ‘surrendered’ in the face of external aggression? They lost a few but only after being quite warlike.

    Anyway in this scenario then I expect that the Argentinian request for second-hand Vulcans would have moved along a little more quickly ( in the real-world timeline it was approved in January 1982 but didn’t proceed due to ‘tensions’ ) which would have rather complicated task-force operations.

    The French force would probably have been operating from Senegal, which is another 1,000 miles farther north than Ascension. That’s another three days sailing for logistical support and probably rules-out using Mirage IVs to hit the Falklands even with their AAR support. So everything would have been carrier- / heli-carrier based with longer, slower lines of communication.

    I reckon it would have taken much longer to prepare for the assault but once underway would have been quicker. Jeanne D’Arc alone could launch more Pumas & Frelons than the British had helicopters in-theatre.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2162602
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Question. How much threat is posed by RPG-7 to Mi-24?

    Other than lucky shots, tackling a helo with RPGs usually involves multiple firers and therefore requires advance notice and co-ordination.

    If those-opposing-Russia managed that, they have quite an arsenal. Most of the anti-armour ones seen in Syria are 1990s-era tandem-warheads from Russia, Egypt and Iran and would likely knock-down a helo through blast alone but because of their weight they all have fairly short range, around 200 metres.

    The anti-personnel projectiles would shred a helo with fragmentation. The Mujahideen used the self-destructing timer fuse to burst those sorts of warhead near Russian helos as a sort of makeshift-proximity fuse, but that required careful preparation and timing.

    Anything on the ground or hovering close to it would be vulnerable to the thermobaric and bounding blast-frag projectiles.

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2163134
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    CH-54 with 152mm gun πŸ˜‰

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]241534[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Iran update: J-10, MiG-35 or Rafale? #2164332
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Those “upgraded” F5s could be upgraded a bit like the Mig 21 BIZON. A recent radar + ECM & R77/73. Maybe even an IRST & they’re good to go.

    That’d probably do the job for the next decade. Give the F-4 fleet a refresh as well. After that time, Iran’s international relationships should have stablised and they can select a long-term fleet based on whom they feel will be the most reliable partner.

    How is the indigenous helicopter production proceeding? The 214 is still a capable medium-lift type, the only thing it really concedes to the S-70 is ballistic tolerance. Keep the 214s flying, add some second-hand Chinooks to update the fleet ( they use the same engine as the 214, useful commonality ). Transport fleet does seem to need some attention, I wonder how Airbus would respond to a request for A400s…?

    Really I don’t see a point rushing into a general fleet replacement programme, there are no pressing first-tier threats to Iran. Better right now to concentrate on personnel and training using known and indigenously-supported assets upgraded with modern sensors and weapons. Once the systems are up to a modern standard they could even start to participate in international operations to cross-train with other nations.

    in reply to: Was F-117 Nighthawk a good fighter ? #2164867
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    No fighter capabilities whatsoever*.

    I don’t believe the official MDS request has ever been revealed, so we just don’t know why the USAF requested an F-designator.

    * it is often said that the F-111 also received a F-designator despite lacking fighter capabilities but in fact the bomb-bay M61 pack was often armed for self-defence during Combat Lancer. The F-117 doesn’t even have that option.

    in reply to: Rockets Red Glare #2165990
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Gorgeous photo, I used to have a poster of that on my wall! Sadly now long lost during house-moves, but thanks for the memories πŸ˜€

    Starstreak from Apache:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]241309[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2166315
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Zaire

    Good find. Kolwezi airfield in mid-1978. The FNLC rebels had over-run the airfield in May and destroyed most of the based Macchis, a Buffalo and a pair of helicopters.

    Looks like the 310 had already been destroyed through negelct, though. Reminds me of the infamous photo of the Zairean Mirage V sitting on top of barrels…

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2169273
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Well exactly. How the F does an airliner at over 20,000ft get hit by a surface-to-surface cruise missile at 200ft?

    It is possible that they’re being overly cautious in case the Russians are [ also using / planning to use ] ALCMs, which generally use a step-down cruise profile.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2169874
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Grainy cinΓ© shot but I hadn’t previously seen Tanzania’s pair of Bell 47s

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]241094[/ATTACH]

    http://www.itnsource.com/en/shotlist/RTV/1974/07/08/BGY509120122/?s=s

    And in the same country, here are four Police 206s that were seized by Uganda and finally released to Tanzania in May 1972. Sounds like an interesting story!w

    The helicopters had been seized last July [1971] when the Irish air cargo aircraft taking them to Dar Es Salaam made an unscheduled stop at Uganda’s Entebbe Airport, 20 miles south of Kampala.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]241095[/ATTACH]

    http://www.itnsource.com/en/shotlist/RTV/1972/05/20/BGY508170344/?s=uh

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2170446
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    3 x Hughes Mk 4 pods ( 1 x 20mm twin-barrel Hughes Mk 11 each ) giving 12,600 rpm in four-seconds bursts.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]241061[/ATTACH]

    2OMM MK 4 MOD 0 GUN POD
    FLIGHT TEST OF THREE PODS INSTALLED ON A4 AIRPLANE
    At Naval Ordnance Test Station China Lake, California
    15 April to 20 July 1963

    http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA366870

    Oh, not forgetting plus 2 x 20 mm Colt Mk 12 internally.

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 480 total)