Buk-M3?
http://pilot.strizhi.info/2007/09/24/4729
It is at Kapustin Yar, anyway 😉
Buk-M1-2. Notice the standard Buk TELAR with the Buk-M2’s 9M317 missile. Buk-M3 would most likely use the Buk-M2 TELAR with the newer phased-array radar.
Is Buk-M3 related to what was referred to as “Mysk” a while ago?
My understanding is that the S-500 is a new system, that has been in development since the 1980’s (halted for a bit due to funding issues). The S-400 should represent the penultimate iteration of the S-300P family I think, with the S-500 being something new, possibly using one of the new MARS modular radar systems to provide long-range acquisition.
Also, regarding limited ABM capability, there should not be anything preventing the systems from accepting EW or preliminary targeting data from the LPAR or BMEW radar systems in Russia (Dnepr, Daryal, Voronezh, etc).
Well your post seemed to suggest Israel should have taken some other alternative. What would you suggest would be as effective as solving the problem themselves?
I don’t care about effective, my point is that they should have done nothing unilaterally. They had no right to commit a blatant act of war, it’d serve them right if Syrian support to Hezbollah became overt and greatly increased after this.
No offense but do you think it would have been better to have sat it in front of the U.N. for ten years and have to attack anyway because the U.N. did nothing?
And what right did the UN have to monitor Syrian weapons development?
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article2461421.ece
Apparently it was a strike on Syrian nuclear-related targets, having not one thing to do with Hizbullah, and therefore being a completely illegal breach of Syria’s territorial sovereignty, especially if the bit about commandos being in the country is to be believed. In the spirit of equality, I’d say a strike on Nahal Soreq would be perfectly justifiable in retaliation. Dimona would be equally effective but is in an unpopulated area and would lack the shock value.
It does also bring to light the fact that Syria’s internal security, to include the air defense network, should now officially be classified as archaic, outdated, and useless.
From his location, I think he is suggesting that this is an everyday occurrence, of no small consequence. The fact that it happened to professional people, relaxing on holiday and not far from their responsiblities is probably not something that will be appreciated on the other side of the pond.
First off, my being American and these people being European has absolutely nothing to do with what I think about the situation. The fact that you think that I have a certain mindset based on my nationality actually says far more about you than what I said says about me.
Regardless, my problem is that these social interest stories are becoming the norm in the news media. When one person out of four billion or so goes missing, why in the world is that a major international headline? What about the fact that oil has hit a record high? Or the fact that, in the USA, the moratorium on not taxing the internet is set to expire November 1st? Somebody went missing. It happens. And you know what? If I wasn’t inundated with the details every thirty seconds I might be moved to actually give a damn anymore, rather than get irritated at the latest attempt to keep real, pertinent information out of my hands.
“From his location”…sheesh, get off your high horse. You’d think, sometimes, that people on the Eastern side of the pond had some sort of serious superiority complex.
From his location, I think he is suggesting that this is an everyday occurrence, of no small consequence. The fact that it happened to professional people, relaxing on holiday and not far from their responsiblities is probably not something that will be appreciated on the other side of the pond.
First off, my being American and these people being European has absolutely nothing to do with what I think about the situation. The fact that you think that I have a certain mindset based on my nationality actually says far more about you than what I said says about me.
Regardless, my problem is that these social interest stories are becoming the norm in the news media. When one person out of four billion or so goes missing, why in the world is that a major international headline? What about the fact that oil has hit a record high? Or the fact that, in the USA, the moratorium on not taxing the internet is set to expire November 1st? Somebody went missing. It happens. And you know what? If I wasn’t inundated with the details every thirty seconds I might be moved to actually give a damn anymore, rather than get irritated at the latest attempt to keep real, pertinent information out of my hands.
“From his location”…sheesh, get off your high horse. You’d think, sometimes, that people on the Eastern side of the pond had some sort of serious superiority complex.
Oh cool, I see you guys have discovered just what is wrong with Western society these days. One person out of a few billion goes missing, and it becomes an international fiasco. People just have no faith in good old social Darwinism anymore.
Oh cool, I see you guys have discovered just what is wrong with Western society these days. One person out of a few billion goes missing, and it becomes an international fiasco. People just have no faith in good old social Darwinism anymore.
Dude, go back and take a good look at the first few frames. It looks more like it’s being pulled out of the back of a plane than falling out of a bombay. Pay particular attention to the front of the bomb.
It looked like the rear latch released first, and the bomb was pulled to the rear by the parachute after the forward latch released. People seem to forget that while the Tu-160 has been primarily a strategic missile carrier, the two bomb bays are actually rather enormous. The Kh-55 launchers don’t even fill up the bays. Fitting something like this into a BLACKJACK’s bay would probably work, and probably occurred given the video footage.
The problem, as I pointed out in the article, is a reliance on single-target SAM systems. They can easily be saturated, and in most cases destroying a small number of them opens a gap in the SAM network.
Futureweapons on the Discovery Military Channel has some aviation-related stuff sometimes. They covered the F-22A once, and the visit to the THAAD site was great stuff.
The Discovery Science Channel has a show called Building The Ultimate, and they documented the assembly and operation of a Nimitz-class carrier. Seeing how they build those things was pretty interesting.
Apart from that, there are some aviation-related shows on the Discovery Military Channel on a pretty regular basis still. Not nearly as cool as the old Wings show, but still worth a watch every now and then when they cover something interesting.
What kind of shows?
Given the current situation, I thought this might be appropriate:
I think 92N6 should be a Flap Lid follow on radar designed for engagement-guidance purposes. 91N6 may be the western called “GraveStone” designed for surveillance and tracking purposes. No Clam Shell, no Tin Shield anymore. These were part of the S-300 older systems. Both would be “merged” into the new stuff
GRAVE STONE is the TOMB STONE/FLAP LID follow-on engagement radar, and as such should be the 92N6. 91N6 appears to be a replacement for the 64N6 BIG BIRD early warning and acquisition radar. The 64N6 and 76N6 appear to have been replaced in the S-400.