dark light

Stepwilk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 515 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Corsair FAH 603 #924844
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Is this actually FAH 603 restored or is it a different FG airframe with a Honduran paint job?

    in reply to: Miles M1 Satyr Replica #927522
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    You can look as much as you wish, but you’ll never find a “Popjoy.” There are still Pobjoys around, though.

    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Tenuous link I grant

    Why do you say it’s a tenuous link? Trumpeter is one of the highest-quality kit manufacturers out there. If they are producing a Whirlwind kit, you can be sure it’ll be a good one.

    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Actually, that’s of great help. Thank you.

    in reply to: P40 droptank on backwards? #960277
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    The many commenters theorizing that this was a napalm dispenser need to realize that napalm (developed at my old university, Harvard) came pretty late to the war. Its very first recorded use was March 1944. Would a P-40 have been dispensing it that late? (I don’t know; you tell me.)

    in reply to: JU 390 #970889
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    According to the excellent book “German Aircraft of the Second World War” by J R Smith and Tony Kay, the JU 390 prototype operating from Mont de Marsan on a test flight in Jan 1944 got to within 20Km (12 miles) of New York and returned safely. So was it potentially the world first inter- continental bomber?

    A well-known urban legend. I recently wrote about this for Aviation History Magazine.

    in reply to: Ejection Seat Survival #983993
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    My U. S.Navy friends used to call their seats of that era (1970s) Martin Baker Back-Breakers.

    in reply to: Big black thing on a beach #996523
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    If it were the U.S., I’d guess it was from some kind of beach-buggy monster truck.

    in reply to: Warbirds firing cannons at airshows. #996527
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    I believe most of those pseudo machine guns are propane-powered and aren’t guns at all. This is technology that was well-developed by Hollywood during the pre-CGI era. Perhaps the Kiwi P-40 is an exception, dunno.

    in reply to: Great Picture of two great bombers of WW2 #942349
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    “…really dwarfs the B17.”

    How so? Stirling is about 13 feet longer but with five feet less wingspan. I’m sure it was a splendid airplane, but it hardly “dwarfed” the B-17. If you indeed want to compare it to the B-29, you’re talking about an airplane that is 12 feet longer than the Shorts and with a 42-foot greater span. That might be your dwarfism right there…

    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Some members seem to treat the forum as some sort of personal messaging service between mates.

    Absolutely true, and for me, it’s the most off-putting thing about the forum. Some of those bozos even require me to know Cockney rhyming slang.

    in reply to: B-17 Cockpit Project #963893
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Did we really stencil “U. S. AIR CORPS” on our seat cushions, since the service branch was actually the United States Army Air Corps? Just askin’.

    in reply to: Belly Tank Scooter #982036
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Presages the fact that after the war, many belly tanks were turned into “lakesters”–very fast straight-line-speed record cars driven on the dry lakes of California and Nevada (Bonneville being the best-known one). Rather than a single-cylinder APU engine like this one, they were typically powered by Ford flathead V8s, later by big ohv engines. I did an article on them some years ago for Air & Space Smithsonian.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #986298
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Just to elaborate a bit for clarity, I believe the upper “flap” is actually a radiator flap, opening some to allow greater flow through the radiator, and the actual flap is the lower portion (black in the photo).

    in reply to: Why was the FAA such a second-class citizen? #989622
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Well, you’re certainly affirming my initial thesis. (At least the thesis I hinted that I was holding to…)

    Yes, the Swordfish from a previous era, but that was my point.

    And yes, the Seafire was a lovely airplane “until it came to landing it on a carrier.” Which is the opposite end of the spectrum from saying “the F6F was as rectangular and ugly as could be, but it was the perfect airplane for landing on a carrier and fighting a naval air war.”

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 515 total)