Is this actually FAH 603 restored or is it a different FG airframe with a Honduran paint job?
You can look as much as you wish, but you’ll never find a “Popjoy.” There are still Pobjoys around, though.
Tenuous link I grant
Why do you say it’s a tenuous link? Trumpeter is one of the highest-quality kit manufacturers out there. If they are producing a Whirlwind kit, you can be sure it’ll be a good one.
Actually, that’s of great help. Thank you.
The many commenters theorizing that this was a napalm dispenser need to realize that napalm (developed at my old university, Harvard) came pretty late to the war. Its very first recorded use was March 1944. Would a P-40 have been dispensing it that late? (I don’t know; you tell me.)
According to the excellent book “German Aircraft of the Second World War” by J R Smith and Tony Kay, the JU 390 prototype operating from Mont de Marsan on a test flight in Jan 1944 got to within 20Km (12 miles) of New York and returned safely. So was it potentially the world first inter- continental bomber?
A well-known urban legend. I recently wrote about this for Aviation History Magazine.
My U. S.Navy friends used to call their seats of that era (1970s) Martin Baker Back-Breakers.
If it were the U.S., I’d guess it was from some kind of beach-buggy monster truck.
I believe most of those pseudo machine guns are propane-powered and aren’t guns at all. This is technology that was well-developed by Hollywood during the pre-CGI era. Perhaps the Kiwi P-40 is an exception, dunno.
“…really dwarfs the B17.”
How so? Stirling is about 13 feet longer but with five feet less wingspan. I’m sure it was a splendid airplane, but it hardly “dwarfed” the B-17. If you indeed want to compare it to the B-29, you’re talking about an airplane that is 12 feet longer than the Shorts and with a 42-foot greater span. That might be your dwarfism right there…
Some members seem to treat the forum as some sort of personal messaging service between mates.
Absolutely true, and for me, it’s the most off-putting thing about the forum. Some of those bozos even require me to know Cockney rhyming slang.
Did we really stencil “U. S. AIR CORPS” on our seat cushions, since the service branch was actually the United States Army Air Corps? Just askin’.
Presages the fact that after the war, many belly tanks were turned into “lakesters”–very fast straight-line-speed record cars driven on the dry lakes of California and Nevada (Bonneville being the best-known one). Rather than a single-cylinder APU engine like this one, they were typically powered by Ford flathead V8s, later by big ohv engines. I did an article on them some years ago for Air & Space Smithsonian.
Just to elaborate a bit for clarity, I believe the upper “flap” is actually a radiator flap, opening some to allow greater flow through the radiator, and the actual flap is the lower portion (black in the photo).
Well, you’re certainly affirming my initial thesis. (At least the thesis I hinted that I was holding to…)
Yes, the Swordfish from a previous era, but that was my point.
And yes, the Seafire was a lovely airplane “until it came to landing it on a carrier.” Which is the opposite end of the spectrum from saying “the F6F was as rectangular and ugly as could be, but it was the perfect airplane for landing on a carrier and fighting a naval air war.”