I believe so Bruce, it was spotted on it’s journey:
http://forums.airshows.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=62297
That’s stunning!!!!
Thanks for sharing the link here
Purely in response to Baz:
😀 Let’s hope the Incident Report gives more details on this then….. and the rebuild gets full manufacturers support…..lol :applause:
I really hope that the distance to run marker board hit during this incident can be repaired, I would hate to think it will be replaced with a carbon fibre copy. Perhaps we will see it lovingly restored by the station workshops and in situ ready for airday 2015.
I doubt that RNAS Culdrose will take the destruction of a piece of their airfield furniture lightly and guess a Merlin helicopter will be sent up to RNAS Yeovilton in the near future to flatten a runway edge light cluster in retribution.
anyway…. donations to help the Navy repair this historic item can be sent to : http://www.RNASCuldrosechristmaspartyfund@btinternet.com
baz
That did actually make me chuckle somewhat… 😉
Nice to an injection of some humour in this – with no bearing on the actual incident nor making light of it…
Would they be able to make a reproduction using only the dataplate (assuming such exists on these marker boards) so keeping it’s unique identity, or would it have to be classed as a replica and only be able to operate on a ‘permit’?
This appeal of yours seems flawed to be honest – where’s your fancy graphic bar totaliser, or the waffle about ‘how these things need funding to keep them where they belong’ type stuff?
Meanwhile – the retaliation…. has this occured yet? No ‘heads up’ posts anywhere or tweets to say the lights went out at Yeovilton?….:D
The load arrived at Kemble – resident company ASI moved it and it’s now awaiting disassembly at their facilities:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Air-Salvage-International/542208509140380?fref=nf
XS568 – poor thing :apologetic:
The owner of this whirlwnd was speaking to a colleague of mine at Waddo and this ‘sudden appearance’ at Weston and now Waddington was very much part of the mater plan for the owner! Sneaking in under the radar wasn’t easy when you keep a bright yellow helicopter at home, but the reaction has proved worth it! There are plans afoot to get a Display Autrhorisation on it too, so we could see a nice SAR demo carried out next season if it all goes to plan….
Personally I’ll be glad when they get a third man on the crew to be ‘winchman’, as watching the video on youtube of it departing made me wince when the co-pilot climbed in with rotors running 😮
I’m not sure I get it?
You are asking for an ID on the stick top yet you clearly have photos of the cockpit they are fitted to?
And now you are saying “all will become clear in good time” as if you already know the answer?
Seems a bit ‘bashed about’ since I last saw it at Kemble? Crumpled nosecone and a rather bent rudder top…..
Wow, that’s some clever lateral thinking (C130 package fitting into the Connie) – sounds quite impressive indeed!
Two seater or single seater Hunter…. they are slightly different? I haven’t got one spare but it’s important to acquire the right one unless you want to modify to fit.
Ask Andy Eastlake-Tanner at Rainbow Aviation – he supplied one for G-FFOX two years ago when we needed a second one for shows…
http://www.rainbowaviation.co.uk/
[ATTACH=CONFIG]229336[/ATTACH]
Our local paper shows how bad it was…..
[ATTACH=CONFIG]229324[/ATTACH]
http://www.expressandstar.com/news/2014/06/18/wolverhampton-registered-plane-crashes-after-take-off/
Had to chuckle at that comment 😉
[ATTACH=CONFIG]228708[/ATTACH]
I had posted this one some time ago, but as it’s topical it seemed appropriate to post it again – my late grandfather took these after I assume he and his colleagues either discovered this abandoned or they recaptured the airfield they were on? Very little known about his wartime service I’m afraid. I do wonder if the german aircraft clock I have actually came from this?
Thanks TO – my immeadiate response was very much tongue-in-cheek by the way 😀
On a more topical note now – my perspective opinion drawn from experience…..
Any Museum I visit must grab my attention to make it worthwhile and memorable – that sounds so obvious but there have been experiences where I wondered why I was there (and that covers a range of subject matters not just aviation).
Interactivity seems to be the key word vital these days to capture the imagination of the younger visitors who are more likely to be from the games console generation and just don’t ‘get it’ when it comes to silent exhibits? When I first became involved with the Midland Air Museum and XF382, I was faced with an aircraft I had actually worked on in my RAF career; so I wanted to bring some life into it as well as some actual history to it as I had been part of it! That meant working within the constraints of being a volunteer as well as the environment the aircraft was placed in. Within that scope, power was restored to it so that the machine was once more ‘alive’ and doing what it was built to do within safety parameters of course. That side of the exhibit drew interest from young and old alike, and became a talking point that was passed on to friends and families hopefully (which in turn encouraged others to visit?). Talking about it all was also part of the plan, as I wanted to give some insight into the aircraft’s individual background as well my own involvement.
Other projects at the Museum have followed similar paths, and that has brought good feedback from public, which only goes to further promote future visits.
The local connections surrounding the Museum are also an important aspect – why it is where it is, and what is the connection with the exhibits etc?
The people working at a Musuem are another vital cog – nothing worse than wandering around without a clue as to what it’s all about or having questions unanswered because there is no-one around.
Layout is important – from easy access to as many as possible, to an uncluttered site plan….
Facilities form part of the experience, as mentioned already. Toilets should be managed and monitored to ensure they are kept clean and useable at all times. On site catering facilities should be along the same lines – clean and well presented. The menu should suit the venue – no point having a 5* facility when visitors only tend to spend an hour or so there, but going to the opposite end of the spectrum – a vending machine facility won’t cut it when you want to spend a day there! Costs are a difficulty with any catering facility – but if it leaves a good impression then I don’t object to spending a few quid there!
A Museum shop brings vital income, but some of them seem to stock such a wide variety of products that they can look like a discount store if not thought through? Themed products are a nice way of having a souvenir of your visit as long as they are not too pricey of course?
In the ideal world for me – the perfect aviation museum would be an entire ex-military airfield brought back to life as a living breathing site just like a timewarp from the RAF era I was accustomed to. Rather like places such as my local Black Country Living Museum do, with volunteers dressed accordingly and role playing so the visitor feels like they have just arrived back in time via the Tardis? It could be achieved with money of course, and the right period venue, and although this is my very biaised aviation opinion – I’m sure other types of Museum would and indeed do thrive by capturing a moment in time which the public seem to lap up?