dark light

johnr

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 127 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Shoreham 2011 – some from both days #502171
    johnr
    Participant

    Thanks Anna.
    I’ve added a few more shots to the main thread, Buchon, Sea Vixen and Mustang
    John

    in reply to: Shoreham from the disabled carpark Sunday #502407
    johnr
    Participant

    Great pictures Cliff.
    I agree with comments about the light.
    John

    in reply to: anna@Shoreham20/08/2011 #502434
    johnr
    Participant

    Nice work – but posted at 4 in the morning. Don’t you ever sleep?
    John

    in reply to: From a very early airshow? #502443
    johnr
    Participant

    Robbo – have you nothing better to do than trawl through my old posts?
    John

    in reply to: Southport Pics #503525
    johnr
    Participant

    From a member of the ‘dirty lens’ club
    Have a read of this. Post #15 tells you his method.

    http://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=52341

    Just for interest here is one of mine using similar equipment to yours.
    (canon 350D and 100/400 IS)
    Speed 1/1500, aperture f5.6, focal length set to 400 – probably the ‘worst case’ for the lens. These have been cut down to 800 pixels wide from 3500.

    One thing that never gets mentioned is the quality and amount (i.e. distance) of the air you are looking through. This was taken on a ‘gin clear’ day at Duxford.

    Full frame
    http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/Duxford%20Oct%2010/Sabrefullframe.jpg
    Cropped
    http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/Duxford%20Oct%2010/Sabret-o800.jpg

    For propellor a/c you will just have to accept that many will have some ‘jitter’.
    The Spitfire in my post about Beachy Head was the only acceptable one from six.

    Finally practise, practise and practise.

    Hope this is of some help

    John

    in reply to: Southport Pics #503533
    johnr
    Participant

    From a member of the ‘dirty lens’ club
    Have a read of this. Post #15 tells you his method.

    http://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=52341

    Just for interest here is one of mine using similar equipment to yours.
    (canon 350D and 100/400 IS)
    Speed 1/1500, aperture f5.6, focal length set to 400 – probably the ‘worst case’ for the lens. These have been cut down to 800 pixels wide from 3500.

    One thing that never gets mentioned is the quality and amount (i.e. distance) of the air you are looking through. This was taken on a ‘gin clear’ day at Duxford.

    Full frame
    http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/Duxford%20Oct%2010/Sabrefullframe.jpg
    Cropped
    http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/Duxford%20Oct%2010/Sabret-o800.jpg

    Hope this is of some help

    John

    in reply to: Eastbourne – Sunday from Beachy Head #503572
    johnr
    Participant

    Great stuff. I was particularly impressed with the long range shots of the Reds and with the F16 and flares.
    Which lens did you use?
    John

    in reply to: A Few HDR Pics from Rougham Wings and Wheels #503872
    johnr
    Participant

    Very moody – I like them. Keep going you seem to be on to something interesting.
    John
    PS. You have got the ‘dead engine’ monument in twice

    in reply to: Airbourne from Beachy Head – Sunday #503873
    johnr
    Participant

    Thanks to all for the compliments.
    To Skyhigh – that’s what the camera saw and the Sabre was very low.
    I reckon that I was about 350/400 ft up.
    John

    in reply to: Airbourne 2011 from Beachy Head #504077
    johnr
    Participant

    😮 Sorry Eh, It was late and I missed it. Actually my reply was not meant to be terribly serious either – my dark sense of humour does get me into trouble sometimes.
    Anyway here’s a couple of others

    http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/airbourne%202011/Hurricane.jpg

    http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/airbourne%202011/Lynx.jpg

    John

    in reply to: Airbourne 2011 from Beachy Head #504102
    johnr
    Participant

    just the business,best keep your location secret or the masses will ruin it.:)

    1. High above the water at ******. You don’t have to have many brain cells to work it out.
    2. There can’t be that many idiots willing to sit for several hours in a cold buffeting wind to get pictures
    John

    in reply to: Anna@OldWarden07/08/2011 #504450
    johnr
    Participant

    Nice pix. I rather liked the one of the Annie against the clouds.
    Were these taken from the flight line down the airfield – I must try there some time
    John

    in reply to: Old Warden Military Pageant #504454
    johnr
    Participant

    Thanks for the kind comments.
    A few more views that others haven’t put up so far

    Who are you looking at?

    http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/Old%20Warden%20Aug%207%202011/Avro19whoareyoulookingat.jpg

    Demon and Hind
    Pictures of biplanes where you can’t see the pilots always seem to lack that certain something. Anybody else feel the same?
    This was the only picture I got where they were banked at the same angle as they were really being buffeted by the wind.

    http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/Old%20Warden%20Aug%207%202011/DemonandHind_2.jpg

    Gladiator

    http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/Old%20Warden%20Aug%207%202011/Gladiator_1.jpg

    Storch

    http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/Old%20Warden%20Aug%207%202011/Storch_3.jpg

    John

    in reply to: *First Post* Flying Legends #504519
    johnr
    Participant

    Looks like you can certainly handle a camera. Which one, and lens, did you choose?
    I liked the X17 P40 the best
    John

    in reply to: East Kirkby 6th August #504538
    johnr
    Participant

    Nice pix – shame about the weather. I would have liked to have seen the DH-2
    John

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 127 total)