Thanks Anna.
I’ve added a few more shots to the main thread, Buchon, Sea Vixen and Mustang
John
Great pictures Cliff.
I agree with comments about the light.
John
Nice work – but posted at 4 in the morning. Don’t you ever sleep?
John
Robbo – have you nothing better to do than trawl through my old posts?
John
From a member of the ‘dirty lens’ club
Have a read of this. Post #15 tells you his method.
http://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=52341
Just for interest here is one of mine using similar equipment to yours.
(canon 350D and 100/400 IS)
Speed 1/1500, aperture f5.6, focal length set to 400 – probably the ‘worst case’ for the lens. These have been cut down to 800 pixels wide from 3500.
One thing that never gets mentioned is the quality and amount (i.e. distance) of the air you are looking through. This was taken on a ‘gin clear’ day at Duxford.
Full frame
Cropped
For propellor a/c you will just have to accept that many will have some ‘jitter’.
The Spitfire in my post about Beachy Head was the only acceptable one from six.
Finally practise, practise and practise.
Hope this is of some help
John
From a member of the ‘dirty lens’ club
Have a read of this. Post #15 tells you his method.
http://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=52341
Just for interest here is one of mine using similar equipment to yours.
(canon 350D and 100/400 IS)
Speed 1/1500, aperture f5.6, focal length set to 400 – probably the ‘worst case’ for the lens. These have been cut down to 800 pixels wide from 3500.
One thing that never gets mentioned is the quality and amount (i.e. distance) of the air you are looking through. This was taken on a ‘gin clear’ day at Duxford.
Full frame
Cropped
Hope this is of some help
John
Great stuff. I was particularly impressed with the long range shots of the Reds and with the F16 and flares.
Which lens did you use?
John
Very moody – I like them. Keep going you seem to be on to something interesting.
John
PS. You have got the ‘dead engine’ monument in twice
Thanks to all for the compliments.
To Skyhigh – that’s what the camera saw and the Sabre was very low.
I reckon that I was about 350/400 ft up.
John
😮 Sorry Eh, It was late and I missed it. Actually my reply was not meant to be terribly serious either – my dark sense of humour does get me into trouble sometimes.
Anyway here’s a couple of others


John
just the business,best keep your location secret or the masses will ruin it.:)
1. High above the water at ******. You don’t have to have many brain cells to work it out.
2. There can’t be that many idiots willing to sit for several hours in a cold buffeting wind to get pictures
John
Nice pix. I rather liked the one of the Annie against the clouds.
Were these taken from the flight line down the airfield – I must try there some time
John
Thanks for the kind comments.
A few more views that others haven’t put up so far
Who are you looking at?

Demon and Hind
Pictures of biplanes where you can’t see the pilots always seem to lack that certain something. Anybody else feel the same?
This was the only picture I got where they were banked at the same angle as they were really being buffeted by the wind.

Gladiator

Storch

John
Looks like you can certainly handle a camera. Which one, and lens, did you choose?
I liked the X17 P40 the best
John
Nice pix – shame about the weather. I would have liked to have seen the DH-2
John