dark light

johnr

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 127 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Yakolev Yak-9UM (N82112 'yellow 06' c/n 0470406) #1098994
    johnr
    Participant

    Thank you. I had already found that and wondered whether it was a replica. Nice to have confirmation.
    John

    in reply to: Duxford Autumn Show 2010 #532818
    johnr
    Participant

    You should be pleased with your day’s work.
    The Catalina is my favourite
    John

    in reply to: Just BBD #532820
    johnr
    Participant

    Were the conditions particularly good, from a photography point of view? I think one of the commentators alluded to it in an interview with Planes TV.’

    Yes and No!
    Yes, because the air was gin clear – no dust, moisture or heat haze.

    No, because a lot of the time you were either at the east end looking into the sun or else further down the flightline where (I think) the a/c would be not be so well lit.

    John

    in reply to: Duxford Oct 10 – what a glorious end to the season #533016
    johnr
    Participant

    A couple more

    Sea Fury

    http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/Duxford%20Oct%2010/SeaFury2_filtered800.jpg

    The Sabre climbs out after take-off

    http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/Duxford%20Oct%2010/Sabret-o800.jpg

    John

    in reply to: Duxford Ten out of ten out of ten #533135
    johnr
    Participant

    Lucky you with the Swordfish. When it went past me on the way out it was almost directly into the sun.
    Question – were you one of those chaps in the background to my Trucktop landing picture?
    John

    johnr
    Participant

    Sorry about the delay I’ve been away a few days – See my duxford post!
    When I mentioned ‘stopping’ I was talking about the propellor looking as if it is stopped if you use too high a shutter speed, not about stopping down the lens.
    I usually find 1/320 is about the most I can use and this brings with it the risk of blur due to the combination camera shake and a long lens. I was suprised that slicer got away with 1/640
    Does this help?
    John

    in reply to: Duxford Ten out of ten out of ten #533194
    johnr
    Participant

    Just as well I couldn’t post mine earlier. Yours would have blown most of mine away!
    The Sally B close-up is a cracker
    John

    johnr
    Participant

    I think that one of us has got hold of the wrong end of the stick here.
    I thought that ND filters were a way of cutting the amount of light entering the camera. I do not see how this affects the distance a propellor moves in a given period of time. Too high a shutter speed results in a ‘stopped’ propellor. I usually use 1/250 or 1/320. Adding an ND filter would mean opening up the lens to a wider aperture, resulting in less depth of focus – the opposite of what I thought was needed.
    John

    in reply to: Shuttleworth Collection Autumn Air Display #533593
    johnr
    Participant

    I’m one of those who ‘wimped out’. The thought of facing a wet and windy trip round the M25 only to end up with a grey, wet and windy OW was too much.
    I like the second shot of the Blackburn. So far I have found it impossible to get a decent picture that shows the pilot’s presence. Well done (pix and narrative)
    John

    in reply to: 2010 Miramar Air Show #533803
    johnr
    Participant

    Nice to see that other airshows have clouds and problems with the direction of the sun. Still wish I’d been there to see it.
    John

    johnr
    Participant

    Life is hard sometimes!
    One thing I noticed is that you get away with 1/640. I’ve always used 1/320 or 1/250 to avoid a ‘stopped’ propellor. This, of course, means a wider aperture and less depth of field – you can’t win
    John

    johnr
    Participant

    That was the pose I was hoping to get. You must have been closer to the crowd line than me.
    One problem with that pass was that the two a/c hardly ever had the same bank angle probably due to the gusty conditions and it was just about right when you took the shot.
    I did wonder if it was the gusty conditions that caused the Hind to ‘bounce’.
    Part of the reason for my query is that I was once told by a camera club member that I shouldn’t worry about focussing on a/c because they were all at infinity anyway – something I couldn’t bring myself to accept.
    Is it me or is the Demon in the last shot slightly less sharp than the Hind? If it is then I think that the answer to my question is ‘depth of focus’.
    Thanks for your reply ( and to everyone else)
    John

    in reply to: What is going on here? One a/c in focus and one out of focus #445874
    johnr
    Participant

    Thank you for your responses.
    Here is the sequence leading up to the original
    The camera didn’t seem to have any problems with these

    http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/Old%20Warden%20Sept%2025/HindandDemon3lores.jpg

    http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/Old%20Warden%20Sept%2025/HindandDemon2lores.jpg

    http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj29/John_C_R/Old%20Warden%20Sept%2025/HindandDemonlores-1.jpg

    John

    in reply to: Goodwood Revival through Elliott's lens #534142
    johnr
    Participant

    That’s a very sharp lens you have there. To think I was wasn’t there and I only live ‘up the road a bit’.
    John

    in reply to: Australian Defence Force Airshow 2010 – RAAF Williamtown #534375
    johnr
    Participant

    Cracking shots – would love to have seen the F111 with its tail ‘on fire’.
    Is that ‘our’ Meteor that moved abroad because nobody wanted to see it?
    John

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 127 total)