Thank you. I had already found that and wondered whether it was a replica. Nice to have confirmation.
John
You should be pleased with your day’s work.
The Catalina is my favourite
John
‘Were the conditions particularly good, from a photography point of view? I think one of the commentators alluded to it in an interview with Planes TV.’
Yes and No!
Yes, because the air was gin clear – no dust, moisture or heat haze.
No, because a lot of the time you were either at the east end looking into the sun or else further down the flightline where (I think) the a/c would be not be so well lit.
John
A couple more
Sea Fury

The Sabre climbs out after take-off

John
Lucky you with the Swordfish. When it went past me on the way out it was almost directly into the sun.
Question – were you one of those chaps in the background to my Trucktop landing picture?
John
Sorry about the delay I’ve been away a few days – See my duxford post!
When I mentioned ‘stopping’ I was talking about the propellor looking as if it is stopped if you use too high a shutter speed, not about stopping down the lens.
I usually find 1/320 is about the most I can use and this brings with it the risk of blur due to the combination camera shake and a long lens. I was suprised that slicer got away with 1/640
Does this help?
John
Just as well I couldn’t post mine earlier. Yours would have blown most of mine away!
The Sally B close-up is a cracker
John
I think that one of us has got hold of the wrong end of the stick here.
I thought that ND filters were a way of cutting the amount of light entering the camera. I do not see how this affects the distance a propellor moves in a given period of time. Too high a shutter speed results in a ‘stopped’ propellor. I usually use 1/250 or 1/320. Adding an ND filter would mean opening up the lens to a wider aperture, resulting in less depth of focus – the opposite of what I thought was needed.
John
I’m one of those who ‘wimped out’. The thought of facing a wet and windy trip round the M25 only to end up with a grey, wet and windy OW was too much.
I like the second shot of the Blackburn. So far I have found it impossible to get a decent picture that shows the pilot’s presence. Well done (pix and narrative)
John
Nice to see that other airshows have clouds and problems with the direction of the sun. Still wish I’d been there to see it.
John
Life is hard sometimes!
One thing I noticed is that you get away with 1/640. I’ve always used 1/320 or 1/250 to avoid a ‘stopped’ propellor. This, of course, means a wider aperture and less depth of field – you can’t win
John
That was the pose I was hoping to get. You must have been closer to the crowd line than me.
One problem with that pass was that the two a/c hardly ever had the same bank angle probably due to the gusty conditions and it was just about right when you took the shot.
I did wonder if it was the gusty conditions that caused the Hind to ‘bounce’.
Part of the reason for my query is that I was once told by a camera club member that I shouldn’t worry about focussing on a/c because they were all at infinity anyway – something I couldn’t bring myself to accept.
Is it me or is the Demon in the last shot slightly less sharp than the Hind? If it is then I think that the answer to my question is ‘depth of focus’.
Thanks for your reply ( and to everyone else)
John
Thank you for your responses.
Here is the sequence leading up to the original
The camera didn’t seem to have any problems with these



John
That’s a very sharp lens you have there. To think I was wasn’t there and I only live ‘up the road a bit’.
John
Cracking shots – would love to have seen the F111 with its tail ‘on fire’.
Is that ‘our’ Meteor that moved abroad because nobody wanted to see it?
John