EDIT: Go to PM

I predicted what will happen, in order to prevent it, but I shouldn’t have never doupt your vigilance…It really pisses you off, this age thing of yours, doesen’t it?

You didn’t predict, a prediction is normally assoicated when someone makes a prophecy without there interference. You were activley manipulating what was going to happen. Like you have said yourself, you were here to Troll and were baiting chinese members to come.

Age?, I cant help it if one certain someone thinks age determines everything like maturity which in this case has proven to be false. I have no problem with age, that is one of the reasons why i dont pretend to be older and have actually openly declared my age like have told you.

But if my doing is trolling to you, then what are you doing?

Trolling is the act which originated from fishing terms not the troll under the bridge. I think it was fly fishing and it involves laying bait for unsuspecting fish. Not many people actually know words they are using and use words like Troll just for its impact. I saw this topic and thought how stupid it was, i then saw your comment and other peoples reply to yours. Its not just me with this opinion about your behaviour here

Chinawhiting= Member thats only purpose in military forums is to seek trouple spots and flaming topics

Im not going to post insult for insult. Extremely childish way to argue

“‘Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to His level, then beats You with experience.”

Usually comes stalks members of his past relationships.

I registered here first, and then you came for your self-proclaimed “confrontation” with me. If you want I can reference other threads in this forum and others were you have stalked me

I only pointed out the outcome of this thread with this base of members, and unfortuanetly I was rigth.

You were the FIRST to attack AND drift off topic, do you know why you were right?. BECAUSE YOU STARTED IT.

……..

This comment from the second post is accusing chinese members of being trouble makers. There is no denying it, like my previous words “Bringing water when theres no fire”
“””But somehow I got the feeling that the chinese sector would turn this into meaningless penny detail comprasion thread that will lose it point in the someway middle of the next page”””

Hats of to the few good pro-chinese members that have focused solely on the military side of this topic

The topic is completely baseless and anything “concluded” is not worth the paper its written on.

This is an armchair general topic which armchair generals like to command, do you know why, because NO ONE here has experience

Our J-8II friend with its LS-6

thats the worst PS to date, looks like 1950s standard special effects

Do you honestly belive that when your NCC is owned and run by the same company which I am part with, I didn’t know about it and didn’t have anything to say about matters that came along there??

When i am told from the owner about what happened, i think its worth more than what your saying

What do you try accomplish with bashing other forums in here?

Where did i bash other forums?

You said you heard a rumour from either SDF or CDF and i said if you heard the rumour from SDF, it would have been old or already dismissed. i have the same opinion now as when i was a member at SDF (as expressed in a few post), even before SDF started i had the same opinion about it. Its got nothing to do with you

I never took a snip at anything. I stated the plain truth to inform you not to trust rumours from SDF because its back from the ages, i also gave you a reason why

I might just give some snips from the forum which you “control” (and which we created so that guys like you can solve and uncover stuff) and lets give others to decide which is worse 😉

You mean New Century China?

Fine by me, im all into constructive critism. Although you wont have much to critise since it is well run and deviod of one line responses, swearing, flamewars, even if i NEVER once moderated that place. Thats how moderation should work

Ususally when people lack other arguments

Would you let a friend keep on posting the wrong word for a few post running?. 😉

I thought a PM would be to much so I put it on the bottom, with no comment of my own, which you were only suppose to read so only you would get the hint so it doesn’t get highlighted

Can someone kind enough to give us some ideas how powerful the laser should be for it to work in such way?

Chinese Laser vs. U.S. Sats?

[..]

If China really is pursuing such a weapon, it wouldn’t be the only country looking at lasers to interfere with enemy eyes above the sky. In a 1997 test, the U.S. fired a chemical laser at a satellite orbiting 420 kilometers above the Earth. The “laser apparently had technical difficulties,” according to the Union of Concerned Scientists, “but the results of the test were startling.”

A lower-power (30-watt) laser intended for alignment of the system and tracking of the satellite was the primary laser source used during the test, and it appeared that this lower-power laser was sufficiently powerful itself to blind the satellite temporarily, although it could not destroy the sensor.

http://www.defensetech.org/archives/cat_eye_on_china.html