dark light

critter592

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 881 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #244542
    critter592
    Participant

    Oh for Christ’s sake. Not another conspiracy theory.

    Those who know me will be aware of my opinions on conspiracy theories/ theorists, and at least one Forum member is familiar with my recent experiences with a few. These range from the “missing” Mitchell crewman who wandered off dazed from the crash, to the unidentified US Thunderbolt that must have been carrying some top-secret equipment, to the best one – The “proven crash site of the RAF Tornado” which was (allegedly) shot down by a UFO during the so-called Howden Moor Incident.

    No more. Please. Enough.

    (Can a Moderator please flag this thread as “conspiracy theorist B.S.”? Thanks.)

    in reply to: WWII Truth and? #1843545
    critter592
    Participant

    Oh for Christ’s sake. Not another conspiracy theory.

    Those who know me will be aware of my opinions on conspiracy theories/ theorists, and at least one Forum member is familiar with my recent experiences with a few. These range from the “missing” Mitchell crewman who wandered off dazed from the crash, to the unidentified US Thunderbolt that must have been carrying some top-secret equipment, to the best one – The “proven crash site of the RAF Tornado” which was (allegedly) shot down by a UFO during the so-called Howden Moor Incident.

    No more. Please. Enough.

    (Can a Moderator please flag this thread as “conspiracy theorist B.S.”? Thanks.)

    in reply to: 1521 Beam Approach Training Flight #999220
    critter592
    Participant

    TO23,

    No worries, and yes – I’m still interested in those scans. Thanks! πŸ™‚

    in reply to: 1521 Beam Approach Training Flight #1001357
    critter592
    Participant

    Thanks chaps.

    I think I should have enough material to make an educated guess as to the appearance of LB415.

    Both models of the Oxford and the Lancaster will appear on my thread over on The Airfix Tribute Forum in due course (I post there under the name DonB).
    Perhaps I should open a similar thread here? πŸ˜‰

    Kind Regards,

    Don (Critter592)

    in reply to: General Discussion #259028
    critter592
    Participant

    Trainspotters? How dare you! :dev2:;)

    Ferroequinologists. “Railway enthusiasts” is also acceptable. πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: Any Trainspotters in? #1857394
    critter592
    Participant

    Trainspotters? How dare you! :dev2:;)

    Ferroequinologists. “Railway enthusiasts” is also acceptable. πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: 1521 Beam Approach Training Flight #1007623
    critter592
    Participant

    Denis, Graham Boak,

    Thanks for that.
    Would I be correct in saying that “my” Oxford would have had some camouflage, rather than being all-yellow?
    I’m thinking that she would have been similar in appearance to PG943, as seen on this decal sheet from Hannants.

    I have some colour pictures on file of the RAFM Oxford when it was displayed at NAM; IIRC it wore the BAT Flight markings from a unit at RAF Spittlegate near Grantham. Might these help?

    Thanks TO23.
    Yes, they would be most appreciated, if only to give me an idea of the size of the markings, positioning, etc.

    Also, would I be correct to suggest that the Oxford you’re modelling is the one which is jointly commemorated at the Screveton memorial in Nottinghamshire?

    It certainly is.
    I am also working on a model of W4103; fortunately I do have a photo of this aircraft.
    I have developed quite a close connection with this accident. I attend the memorial service every year, which is organised by a lady from the village.
    There are always many relatives from both crews in attendance.
    I have pages for both aircraft on my Website – Link is in my signature! πŸ™‚

    Don

    in reply to: General Discussion #260624
    critter592
    Participant

    Jim,

    Click on the link in this post – All will be revealed! πŸ˜€

    Don

    in reply to: Better Than Being Clamped…..I Suppose. #1858966
    critter592
    Participant

    Jim,

    Click on the link in this post – All will be revealed! πŸ˜€

    Don

    in reply to: General Discussion #260637
    critter592
    Participant

    Following the discovery of the remains of King Richard III under a Leicester car park, a caption for this photo could be:

    “Another Dick found in car park!”

    I’ll get me coat… :diablo:

    in reply to: Better Than Being Clamped…..I Suppose. #1858996
    critter592
    Participant

    Following the discovery of the remains of King Richard III under a Leicester car park, a caption for this photo could be:

    “Another Dick found in car park!”

    I’ll get me coat… :diablo:

    in reply to: Stirling Crash, Norfolk, July 1941 #1010706
    critter592
    Participant

    There is a good photo of a line-up of 7 Squadron Stirlings in David Earl’s book, Hell on High Ground 2.
    Among them is N6075, MG-A.
    Later, while attached to the conversion flight with 101 Squadron, (and coded SR-W3), she crashed at Merryton Low, near Leek.

    in reply to: In todays paper, TIGHAR wags its tail again. #1010709
    critter592
    Participant

    …The International Group for Hysterical Aviation Rumours…

    Love it! πŸ˜€

    And, for the record, if anyone IS up for recovering this aircraft, I’m in.
    While I’m unable (at the moment)to contribute financially, myself and my trusty spade are available!

    Don

    in reply to: P-51 bits? #1010714
    critter592
    Participant

    the stainless pin reminds me of some part of a browning mount, but not sure

    I’m sure I have a similar part, which originated from a fieldwalk where I was looking for evidence of a P-47 crash.

    in reply to: Goodbyeeeeeeee! #941102
    critter592
    Participant

    Obviously Photoshopped. But funny. πŸ˜€

    WV-903 – Have you got that pic? I’ve looked on the ‘Net, but can’t find it…

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 881 total)