Which pretty much sums up the problem there…….:(

“Do you think then that wars to conquer and destroy other nations are no longer existant?”

Taking the OP’s question I would still say the answer is no. Old conflicts may be in stalemate but the participants are not actively engaged in conflict, so far as I am aware. Kashmir might fall into that category, although the protagonists are not India and Pakistan per se.

Just the same as nobody is forced to read threads on here about Ryanair and not be happy with it’s content 😉

Quite right – it’s just like banging your head against a brick wall. It’s great when it stops.;)

But these are not “wars of possession” in 2011. Russia and Japan are not at war, China’s “issues”, whatever that means, is that China occupies Tibet but the two countries are not at war. And the Cold War ended 20 years ago, as you mentioned, so is not relevant to the thread debate, is it?

😀 Yes, a classic moment!

Or perhaps even realistic.

What is the point of these pro/anti-Ryanair threads? The points made are predictable because they are repeated every time the subject crops up. Some people hate Ryanair, some people love to hate them, some people don’t care and get on with it and some love it. So we are unlikely to discover anything new or more importantly for this forum, anything to new to add to the debate.

Are we?:(

As long as they supply dummies for them to suck!!!:D