dark light

Sky High

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,036 through 4,050 (of 7,143 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1113249
    Sky High
    Participant

    We are not out of the woods yet, although it seems surprising that the imposition of VAT and the fuel price hike were not factored in to the calculations sooner.

    https://mail.google.com/mail/?dest=http://mail.google.com/mail/&shva=1#label/VSC/12e39e52b5f71c7b

    in reply to: Where is the aviation on TV gone ? #1113636
    Sky High
    Participant

    I think the original point is misconstrued. The fact that aviation is the second most popular spectator sport after soccer is irrelevant. You might as well say that angling is the sport most participated in of all so we should be deluged with angling programmes. I would suggest that about 10% of the 100,000 who attend an airshow would actually watch aviation related programmes on TV. The majority attend airshows as a great day out with the flying as just one component of their day.

    in reply to: General Discussion #294352
    Sky High
    Participant

    I freely admit I am anti onland wind farms but if they were efficient I would support them…
    Some quotes from an article…

    Efficient at ‘Generating’ money…

    Quel surprise :rolleyes:

    And finally…:rolleyes:

    Countries which have significantly embraced wind farms such as Germany have reviewed their position in the light of such results and are now determining that developers move to off shore positioning.

    It should be noted that Volkswind who are seeking on shore opportunities in the UK are a German company.

    Sorry for the lengthy re-quote, but I should stress that I too would be wholly in favour of them if they were cost and energy efficient and if there was the remotest chance of them supplying even 60% of their nominal capacity to the grid, all the time. But I would still not support their construction if they affected the airshows at Duxford.

    in reply to: Windfarm debate – was Duxford airshows at risk? #1887029
    Sky High
    Participant

    I freely admit I am anti onland wind farms but if they were efficient I would support them…
    Some quotes from an article…

    Efficient at ‘Generating’ money…

    Quel surprise :rolleyes:

    And finally…:rolleyes:

    Countries which have significantly embraced wind farms such as Germany have reviewed their position in the light of such results and are now determining that developers move to off shore positioning.

    It should be noted that Volkswind who are seeking on shore opportunities in the UK are a German company.

    Sorry for the lengthy re-quote, but I should stress that I too would be wholly in favour of them if they were cost and energy efficient and if there was the remotest chance of them supplying even 60% of their nominal capacity to the grid, all the time. But I would still not support their construction if they affected the airshows at Duxford.

    in reply to: What made you (want to) Swear Today III? #1887132
    Sky High
    Participant

    It is a disease which infects a great many car/van drivers, I find. The necessity of having to park no more than a few metres from your destination – yellow line parking, disabled bay parking, blocking driveway parking, out-of designated bay parking in car parks and so on…….:mad:

    in reply to: General Discussion #294455
    Sky High
    Participant

    It is a disease which infects a great many car/van drivers, I find. The necessity of having to park no more than a few metres from your destination – yellow line parking, disabled bay parking, blocking driveway parking, out-of designated bay parking in car parks and so on…….:mad:

    in reply to: General Discussion #294460
    Sky High
    Participant

    Are you sure you want to hear it…..?;)

    in reply to: What made you (want to) Swear Today III? #1887134
    Sky High
    Participant

    Are you sure you want to hear it…..?;)

    in reply to: Designer of the Black & Decker Workmate has died #1887184
    Sky High
    Participant

    That’s good to know and from your comments he clearly enjoyed his life as well, which is good to know – not all inventors of simple but clever ideas benefit from them.

    in reply to: General Discussion #294526
    Sky High
    Participant

    That’s good to know and from your comments he clearly enjoyed his life as well, which is good to know – not all inventors of simple but clever ideas benefit from them.

    in reply to: General Discussion #294530
    Sky High
    Participant

    One of the key inventions of the last century and I hope it kept him in comfortable retirement until his sad death.

    in reply to: Designer of the Black & Decker Workmate has died #1887191
    Sky High
    Participant

    One of the key inventions of the last century and I hope it kept him in comfortable retirement until his sad death.

    in reply to: Best Value RTF Model #221614
    Sky High
    Participant

    Great – thanks Flying-A, I will keep an eye out for it over the next few weeks.
    SH

    in reply to: General Discussion #294624
    Sky High
    Participant

    So unless you are inconsistent you would presumably ban all airshows and while you are about it you might as well ban all historic aircraft from flying as well and then……..well, when do you stop? What nonsense. Or did I miss a smiley….?

    in reply to: Windfarm debate – was Duxford airshows at risk? #1887281
    Sky High
    Participant

    So unless you are inconsistent you would presumably ban all airshows and while you are about it you might as well ban all historic aircraft from flying as well and then……..well, when do you stop? What nonsense. Or did I miss a smiley….?

Viewing 15 posts - 4,036 through 4,050 (of 7,143 total)