Well indeed – problems arise daily and we all have to find way of solving them. That’s the solution. In this case the solution was to kill the dogs, albeit in a way none of us would support.
Leaving aside the totally unsupportable method of their slaughter, which I do not condone for a second, what should they have done with 100 dogs for which there was no work and no need and presumably no means to feed and water them?
Leaving aside the totally unsupportable method of their slaughter, which I do not condone for a second, what should they have done with 100 dogs for which there was no work and no need and presumably no means to feed and water them?
Linc 7 – you feel strongly about this as is clear from your posts but despite the fact that you do not condone the activity, can you accept that other people in other cultures do things differently and often in ways which might offend us?:)
Linc 7 – you feel strongly about this as is clear from your posts but despite the fact that you do not condone the activity, can you accept that other people in other cultures do things differently and often in ways which might offend us?:)
I think that is exactly right, PMN. And that thought takes us back to the earlier posts in the debate. It is one of those subjects where objectivity struggles to gain ascendancy over emotion. Those two words “cull” and “seal” are guranteed to stir the emotions in many people.
I think that is exactly right, PMN. And that thought takes us back to the earlier posts in the debate. It is one of those subjects where objectivity struggles to gain ascendancy over emotion. Those two words “cull” and “seal” are guranteed to stir the emotions in many people.
Sign In
