It certainly sounds it! Another area for simplication me thinks.:)

Sounds as though she should have featured in the SDR!;)

I believe that once in administration any contracts between the organisation in administration and its debtors and creditors are void. But I am happy to be corrected on this point.

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Scilly-Rescue-Operation-Underway-After-Fire-Breaks-Out-On-Fishing-Vessel-Off-Isles-Of-Scilly/Article/201010415776606?lpos=UK_News_Carousel_Region_1&lid=ARTICLE_15776606_Scilly%3A_Rescue_Operation_Underway_After_Fire_Breaks_Out_On_Fishing_Vessel_Off_Isles_Of_Scilly

We have to be careful to avoid ascribing human characteristics and emotions to animals. We can only observe an animal’s actions from a human perspective and interpret them as such. Animals’ actions are not the result of a thought process.

I cannot see the relevance of the trying to compare animals’ actions with humans’ actions anyway. Killing for sport is something humans do and have done for centuries. End of story.

Question 1. Who said it was clever?

Question 2. The England football team against….almost anyone.

When you say that sizable charges are held then the only way they are likely to be redeemed is by selling to the highest bidder, so I do not follow the argument.

Al – I sense your resentment has more to do with your dislike of the manner and style of the participants than the sport itself. But please correct me if I am wrong.

And in answer to another post I wonder who has seen the infamous footage of killer whales tossing penguins around for sport. I doubt that humans are alone in killing for sport and personally, I have no strong feelings about hunting and killing for sport. I hasten to add that I have never hunted nor do I own a rifle.