I wonder if he would have gotten into the same amount of trouble if he had posted it as his Facebook status?
Why would that have made a difference? In themsleves the remarks were still irresponsible and stupid.
It’s always been a “aitch” to me also.
The thing I detest is people’s misuse of ” there, their and they’re”
Or possibly an “aitch”.:D
“He said,like…” She said, like….” No we don’t like like!:(
It’s always been a “aitch” to me also.
The thing I detest is people’s misuse of ” there, their and they’re”
Or possibly an “aitch”.:D
“He said,like…” She said, like….” No we don’t like like!:(
May I be the first to respond? But I reluctantly agree with you as I posted earlier. I mentioned my latest pet hate “I am good” in response to “How are you?” But the evolution of language is very strong and our petty irritations will become irrelevant, I am sure.:(
May I be the first to respond? But I reluctantly agree with you as I posted earlier. I mentioned my latest pet hate “I am good” in response to “How are you?” But the evolution of language is very strong and our petty irritations will become irrelevant, I am sure.:(
I took the Airport out the equation to show that people make flippant comments all the time in this way, and security or not, this comment, airport related or otherwise, reflects the type of flippant comment that wouldn’t raise any eyebrows in any other respect.
Precisely – you are making my point for me. In any other respect it would not , but in the respect we are discussing – it does.
Have you ever been to India? In what sense or definition are they “better off than we are?” I’ve been looking but I’ve yet to find a slum in the UK, yet a lone a slum on the scale of Dharavi…but hey its along time since I’ve been up north. I can pass you some snaps from my time working in some of the poorest slums in India and East Africa if you want to do a comparison…..
Overseas aid is a useful preventative method, most wars are caused by disconent, negelect and want.
India has strong growth and large reserves, although there is some concern about its Debt to GDP ratio.
How it spends its money is its affair and with the staggering debt level we have, which is growing month on month, year on year, it is irresponsible to make any area of expenditure sacrosanct, most of all expenditure on other nation’s problems.
Most wars are caused by territorial dispute and ambition and religious and racial antagonism.
Snafu – sorry I did not answer your other question because I wasn’t sure how to. It is just that I don’t see the problem. We leave, we continue to trade – buying and selling as before, but now free to legislate in a way that suits us, free from the legal shackles of the EU, £ 6.5 billion p.a. better off – £65 billion plus over a decade. Not a fortune in the vast scheme of our debt, I agree, but better than nothing.
I just don’t buy into the doomesday scenario some would write “if we should leave”.
And as for the Euro, of course it works when the playing field is level and all is sunshine and roses but look what happens when rweal life intervenes and it tries to rationalise a raft of contradictory fiscal regimes. It’s a mess and will get worse long before it gets better.
Snafu – sorry I did not answer your other question because I wasn’t sure how to. It is just that I don’t see the problem. We leave, we continue to trade – buying and selling as before, but now free to legislate in a way that suits us, free from the legal shackles of the EU, £ 6.5 billion p.a. better off – £65 billion plus over a decade. Not a fortune in the vast scheme of our debt, I agree, but better than nothing.
I just don’t buy into the doomesday scenario some would write “if we should leave”.
And as for the Euro, of course it works when the playing field is level and all is sunshine and roses but look what happens when rweal life intervenes and it tries to rationalise a raft of contradictory fiscal regimes. It’s a mess and will get worse long before it gets better.
Are you 102 years old? I’ll bet you didn’t like mobiles, or the internet when they first came out eh?? “Not god’s work!”
He DIDN’T act like a moron! Let’s take the Airport out of the equation because it get’s people fired up. If you’d been sat at a station with friends and been delayed over and over again because of something you judged to be incompetency on the part of a train operating company, you may make some comment verbally to your travel companioins along the lines of “if they don’t get this train here in the next 5 mins I’m gonna go and smack the management round the face”. It’s EXACTLY the same, a vent of frustration aimed at a view of incompetence, but expressed to his friends via a different medium to verbal, or even text.
I’ll ignore your first comment as being unworthy of it, just rather sad.
You cannot take the airport out of the equation, as you put it because that is exactly the reason for the problem and the debate we are having. Anyone will know, unless they have been dwelling in a cave for a decade, just how sensitive anything to do with flying and security is. So to tweet what he did makes him either wilfully irresponsible or stupid, or both. Either way he is a moron.
Now I follow. And your comment that it would be a white elephant seems entirely justified. I think there are similar debates going on about Manston and a possible extension of the new fast-rail links in Kent. But Manston has failed twice, I think, in the last 10 years trying to operate passenger flights to Europe and to the USA.
I used to think that the Gov would sort out its defence funding once we were involved in a war where, regretably, large number of servicemen and women would come home in body bag as a result of lack oft resources and equipment. how niave was I, this Gov actually carried on cutting the budget when we are a war. If I could I would charge the Gov with negligence for endangering the lives of our armed forces above what can be expected due to their poor management and duty of care.
And to add insult to injury an new Tory government would slash defence but ring fence overseas aid both to countries in need and those like India, which are better off than we are. Madness.:mad:
Oh, come on! That’s the most ridiculous response to this I can imagine. It isn’t Twitters fault this guy wrote what he did and it isn’t their fault some brain dead fool decided to report it.
Paul
Oh, come on Paul. I didn’t say it was Twitter’s fault – Twitter is inanimate, after all. What I am saying is that if this, to me, infantile communication medium did not exist he could not have sent his stupid tweet. I am not condoning the actions of the authorities in any way. In that I agree with you.
He acted like a moron and the authorities over-reacted.
Let’s take a balanced view of this. He made the comment that anyone with a shred of sense knows could be taken wrongly, so it really wasn’t the wisest thing to say. However, it really was very obvious it was intended as a joke so regardless of which jumped up little tosser reported it (and he needs a good slap for being stupid and should be charged with wasting police time), surely the police should have had the sense to just dismiss it instead of wasting everyone’s time investigating it so thoroughly? I’m sure someone somewhere will give the whole ‘you’d be talking differently had he actually blown it up so wouldn’t you rather the police be careful just in case’ speech, but frankly, no, I wouldn’t rather they be careful to the point of stupidity. I’d rather a bit of common sense and logic be brought back to the whole situation instead of these ridiculous and almost pathetic examples of paranoia we keep hearing about. All situations like this do is make people even more worried about flying, they don’t improve things in any way, shape or form.
Why?!
Paul
It was a flippant response, but if Twitter didn’t exist the incident wouldn’t have happened. Sorry, but I am NOT a fan!
I blame Twitter.:mad: