dark light

Jayce

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 449 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfire Mk I P9374 #1059738
    Jayce
    Participant

    Maybe they’re hoping to talk the value down, so they can buy it. :diablo:

    in reply to: BoB Spitfire formation at Duxford in 2000 #1061896
    Jayce
    Participant

    Maybe “AR654”? – which was Mk VIII G-BKMI’s identity at the time.

    Tony Andrews

    That probably explains it, Tony. And Mark12 is right, I should’ve googled before opening my trap. 😮

    in reply to: BoB Spitfire formation at Duxford in 2000 #1061967
    Jayce
    Participant

    20 flying each day according to Flypast and 22 present in total. I think your list is missing PL983, SM832, MK912 for the attendees.

    MK912 was static only. According to the show report MK356 flew Saturday only and MK732 only on Sunday.

    All made complicated by the fake Pearl Harbor codes on several aircraft.

    AR213 is definitely not listed as present and I can’t recall any sign of AR614 flying while it was in the UK.

    Tony Andrews

    Huh, I’ve always had it in my head that 614 was present as static, ( I don’t think it had it’s permit to fly, yet) but I’m probably misremembering.

    in reply to: BoB Spitfire formation at Duxford in 2000 #1062135
    Jayce
    Participant

    AR614 and or AR213, I think…

    in reply to: Heavy Spitfire landing ca 1944 #1064619
    Jayce
    Participant

    I can’t work out exactly what it is but appears to be something that was outside the aircraft on the other side of the hedge.

    Landing gear breaking off.

    in reply to: Brooklands visit. #1067628
    Jayce
    Participant

    Jayce- Kermit’s Lancaster didnt have all its fuselage replaced. The sections used for it centre around from the wing trailing edge going backwards.

    Ah, OK. So has Jeremy just borrowed the ‘976 identity for his reconstruction then or was the MR nose removed before (or at) Strathallan?

    in reply to: Brooklands visit. #1071554
    Jayce
    Participant

    The lancaster uses some original parts (including RCAF) from the cockpit area (glazing)and uses parts made for that BBC series on the reenacting the Dams raid with modern RAF personnel. I think it still belongs to Jeremy Collins (who owns the lanc nose often seen at Beltring).

    It does raise an interesting provenance question though. Do we know which identity Kermit Weeks’ Lanc has? Did it stay as ‘976 or become ‘994 with the fuselage replacement?

    in reply to: Duxford, Again…. #1072421
    Jayce
    Participant

    Ex Swedish Fairey Firefly TT1 SE-BRG.

    curlyboy

    Ahhh, the under nose radiator was throwing me. Knew it wasn’t a Fulmar!

    in reply to: Duxford, Again…. #1072430
    Jayce
    Participant

    What’s the orange aircraft on the left of the last pick?

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk I P9374 #1079869
    Jayce
    Participant

    Ok originality aside, David’s photo’s, for me, raise two related, albeit rivet counterish, questions….

    1) What is the little grey patch on the rudder?

    2) Are you sure it’s in the right spot? As they’re usually over the blue band on the rudderstripe in just about every contemporary photo I’ve seen…. 😀

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk I P9374 #1082355
    Jayce
    Participant

    It’s not to say that the work isn’t valuable, that the Spitfire isn’t a real Spitfire, but to say that a heavily restored Spitfire such as this is the same as, say, P7350, which while it has been restored, carries original skins, etc, is missing the point a little!

    I don’t think it is. Which has value more? The object or the patina it has aquired?

    Of ‘7350 and ‘9374, ’74 is probably closer to something that rolled out of Castle Bromwich 70 years ago. From that perspective its probably more “authentic” than the battered, corroded and dusty examples found in museums.

    R6915 is another example. I had a good look at it last year and 30 years spent hanging from the IWM ceiling haven’t done it many favours. In fact, some of the cowlings look to be in danger of falling off and landing on someone’s head!

    What happens when its time for it to recieve some TLC? Does the conservation work undermine its historical value? Even if it means R6915 lasts another 70 years?

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk I P9374 #1082676
    Jayce
    Participant

    Well done everybody connected to this fantastic renaissance…..I would however ask…does this particular aircraft now bring into being the words new build …rebuild…or even kit build… for all the recently dug ‘projects’ that are appearing at ever growing prices with or without original factory plates…or even newly manufactured plates.

    Surely by now, we are all old enough to admit that 1 or 2% of original metal can no longer classify originality. Its laughable to tell people that here is a rebuillt Spitfire that flew in the B of B …Oh really !!!….then the long winded discussion of how much is original.

    That a newly rebuilt aircraft is less original than something that’s been flying for 70 years is a silly notion anyway. Anyone who understands just how much wear and tear flying examples go through will know the relevance of the phrase; Trigger’s Broom.

    There are what? Four or five Spitfires still wearing wartime paint? How many of those have repaints and cat A, B, C or D, (or even E) damage on their cards and how likely are they to be 100% original therefore?

    Anywhere the ‘Ship of Theseus’ paradox can apply, it’s probably not a good idea to talk of originality in terms of parts.

    in reply to: Spitfire P8088 #1084170
    Jayce
    Participant

    Thanks, Jon.

    in reply to: Duxford, Again…. #1034715
    Jayce
    Participant

    Nice to see a Mk.Ia that is properly Dark Earth and not Dale Winton Bronze! 😀

    in reply to: Duxford, Again…. #1035878
    Jayce
    Participant

    *sigh*

    Oh, for a Tiff and a Mossie… a Barracuda, too.

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 449 total)