dark light

kodak

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 416 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RAF Andover replacement #1390380
    kodak
    Participant

    As said, the dark earth/sand with black undersides was standard for tactical transports, also Beverlies, Argosies, Twin Pins received it. The white over the cockpit was designed to have a reflective quality to prevent overheating in the Arabian sun.
    All were returned to the UK in 1970 , I doubt if 46 Squadron went further than Germany in the remaining years, though a detachment was maintained in Cyprus to support the NEAF Vulcan force – they may have gone desert bound a few times.
    3 still remain active in the UK – XS606 and 646 with the Empire Test Pilots School/QUINETIC and XS596 is the UK “Open Skies” aircraft, all based at Boscombe Down.
    Only preserved one is an E3 calibration variant at Cosford, though there is a PR version in storage there as well. Neither have the lovely “desert” scheme.
    Only UK and NZ used the Andover though the HS748 from which the Andover originated, has seen widespread service.

    in reply to: Australian International Air Show #1390591
    kodak
    Participant

    PZL 104 Wilga – Polish agricultural aircraft.

    That anniversary Hornet has got to be one of the most gorgous paint jobs ever!!

    in reply to: RAF Andover replacement #1390595
    kodak
    Participant

    Andovers were based with 52Sqn, Seletar and 84Sqn Sharjah until 1969 then all returned to 46sqn based at Abingdon and 242OCU,Thorney Island until 1975. Their retirement came with the massive mid-70s transport cuts due to the shrinking overseas RAF commitments. During that time we lost the Comet, Brittania, Argosy, Andover and Belfast, leaving just the Herc and VC10. Andovers did remain in service as calibration aircraft and the VIP/comms fleet until 1991.

    in reply to: Possible or impossible? #1426498
    kodak
    Participant

    I found this link on F-105’s based in Germany…

    http://members.aol.com/dgtheskier/thud-eur.htm

    TNZ

    D’oh ! meant to say UK !!

    in reply to: Possible or impossible? #1428600
    kodak
    Participant

    But the F105 was based here, something that obviously never was the case with the 14.

    Moggy

    F105s were never based in Europe!

    Several units made week or fortnight TDYs to various places like Sculthorpe or Lakenheath but never permanently based.

    in reply to: Cosford Photos For Those Unfamiliar… #1430256
    kodak
    Participant

    So that huge monstrosity for just 10 airframes shoehorned in overlaping each other with no real way of standing back and admiring/respecting their size and majesty!!??

    Plus I’ve contacted several museums requesting “photo days” – where as much stuff can be wheeled out and photographed in the open air. A nice little earner?? No chance of that here now !

    in reply to: Buccaneer Pics #1434717
    kodak
    Participant

    If someone can identify this aircraft, I would be pleased.

    Thks in advance

    Its a Buccaneer! 😉

    in reply to: Jaguar at Old Warden #1357562
    kodak
    Participant

    I think she is still in service as a GR3A with 54 sqn

    Sure is !!! First flew 5 November 1973!!

    in reply to: Jaguar at Old Warden #1358544
    kodak
    Participant

    XX119/01 was the ’86 solo display Jaguar from 2sqn of 226 OCU, the pilot TBA unless they want to make themselves known here!?. Even if the wheels touched, the Jag was designed from the outset to be capable of STOL from rough strips. Late 70s/early 80s Farnboroughs featured a Jag operating from the grass but it still looks very impressive.
    2005 will see the last display season by a RAF Jaguar so enjoy!
    The French will retire their final few from 7wing this year, replaced by the Rafale. The Indians still have a few hundred in service and the Omani aircraft have recently been upgraded.
    Someone mentioned a Tomcat thread – next year that will be a historic (i.e. out of service) aircraft so it should be welcomed here! Or does historic mean “must have a prop”!!??

    in reply to: Health and Safety strikes again… #1371470
    kodak
    Participant

    Radium is the offending substance, but as in most things with H&S its exposure and exposure limits depending on your age, health, child bearing abilities (women only!) etc. Some one mentioned x-rays – you probably have had more xrays than the operators because they are protected on a daily basis and can measure how many they are exposed to.

    I really dont think that a minute or two sitting in a cockpit is going to push anyone into the danger zone for exposure. I cant find any evidence to suggest that aircrew who flew and are still flying aircraft so painted have had any linking ill health effects.
    BUT there is a risk of exposure to a potentially lethal substance, no matter how small and we have to lean on the side of caution for fear of litigation which is all to easy these days.

    Some info here;

    http://www.hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q133.html

    http://www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/nwh_gfx_en/ART13956.html

    http://www.internationalcockpitclub.org.uk/discus/messages/4/71.html?1058660253

    in reply to: Vickers Valiant – BIG flying model #1371548
    kodak
    Participant

    From the perimeter, not much – they could easily keep a model within the fence when flying it, so I doubt you’d see anything at all.

    Indeed, Wittering is an awful place to view ! And Gaydon was the first Valiant base!!

    in reply to: Health and Safety strikes again… #1371556
    kodak
    Participant

    As some have said dont shoot the H&S guys or the museum. Blame the blame culture that has progreesively spread from across the pond where people can and will sue for anything. H&S are there to protect the likes of museums from these low life!

    in reply to: HP Victor photos #1381777
    kodak
    Participant

    Wel one, heres a few more…….

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v147/AEROMEDIA/Scan244.jpg

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v147/AEROMEDIA/Scan239.jpg

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v147/AEROMEDIA/Scan238.jpg

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v147/AEROMEDIA/Scan237.jpg

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v147/AEROMEDIA/Scan233.jpg

    in reply to: HP Victor photos #1381778
    kodak
    Participant

    A few from me……….

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v147/AEROMEDIA/Scan253.jpg

    in reply to: Red Bull P-38 #1394216
    kodak
    Participant

    Hey if you guys don’t want it, send it to the UK and we’ll fly it in formation with the other Red Bull twin boomer…

    Hmmm…. hav’nt we tried something similar before with disastrous consequences??
    If they’re painting it like that – leave it over there I say!

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 416 total)