dark light

Yak 11 Fan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,496 through 3,510 (of 4,023 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #399943
    Yak 11 Fan
    Participant

    Best of luck guys, hope you have a fantastic day.

    in reply to: Mr & Mrs Damien Burke?????? #1976928
    Yak 11 Fan
    Participant

    Best of luck guys, hope you have a fantastic day.

    in reply to: Warbird Aero's #2091132
    Yak 11 Fan
    Participant

    Well thats just great, we seem to have hacked off somebody who knows what they are talking about, thats a great shame as I’m sure we could have learnt a lot from that gentleman 🙁

    in reply to: Duxford to ban aerobatics??? #2091328
    Yak 11 Fan
    Participant

    I have watched the Frightening Blighters on a number of occasions and undoubtably they are spectacular, however I am not keen on their display due to the fact that they are so close together. I fall into the camp of enjoying the more sedate warbird displays from a personal preference however I fail to see how an out right ban on Warbird Aerobatics will significantly change things.

    in reply to: Next year's airshows could be very good #2091344
    Yak 11 Fan
    Participant

    I fear the only example of a Whirlwind we will see fly is one with it’s propellors on it’s head, and the only flying TSR2 will be if the IWM decide to hang it from the roof after all.

    There is an airworthy Firefly in America with a couple of others being restored, a Mk1 project was recently advertised for sale in Sweden and there are the two former Ethiopian aircraft in South africa that periodically get advertised. On top of this I understad there are one or two under restoration in Australia.

    in reply to: Blenheim Accident #2091424
    Yak 11 Fan
    Participant

    Originally posted by DazDaMan

    Supposing G-BPIV was too badly damaged to be rectified quickly, could G-MKIV be made to fly again?

    G-MKIV suffered far greater damage than it would appear that G-BPIV suffered.

    in reply to: Blenheim Accident #2091433
    Yak 11 Fan
    Participant

    That would most likely be the IWM’s example that ARCO were rebuilding and putting into a yellow RCAF scheme. This is the other airframe that Ormond Haydon Baillie brought to the UK which suffered some damage at Harwich docks. As I understand it this has been the property of the IWM for some years now.

    in reply to: Blenheim Accident #2091438
    Yak 11 Fan
    Participant

    Originally posted by mike currill
    Bit of a difference though, the hurricane is “only” rag and tube construction not metal skinned

    Not strictly correct as on all current Hurricanes the wings are metal skinned and LF363 suffered extensive wing damage.
    You make it sound easy to rebuild a Hurricane.

    in reply to: Airbourne 2003 #2091441
    Yak 11 Fan
    Participant

    Originally posted by A330Crazy

    As Ashley says what are the things in the 5th picture???

    I think they may be a pair of Rutan Varieze things, looks like they have been left out in the sun to long and have melted.

    in reply to: Blenheim Accident #2091483
    Yak 11 Fan
    Participant

    Originally posted by mike currill
    If you care to check I think you will find that either this one or her predecessor flew witha Mk I nose and I am pretty certain it was G-BPIV (this one). I actually have a photo somewhere of it.

    I’d love to see the photo as last time I saw the Mk1 nose it was still being rebuilt, I know I’ve not been around Duxford as much recently as I had in previous years, but I’d be very suprised if this did happen.

    in reply to: Blenheim Accident #2091699
    Yak 11 Fan
    Participant

    Doughnut by name, Doughnut by nature.

    in reply to: Blenheim Accident #2091846
    Yak 11 Fan
    Participant

    Originally posted by Midway
    The ‘security team’ are trained to operate fire appliances and to rescue crew from burning wrecks are they? I wonder what the Fire Brigades Union have to say about that. As we heard so often last year, fire fighting is a specialised job carried out by firemen.

    Who Cares!!!!!! This is not the place to introduce this debate.

    It is generally standard practice for airfields to have fire crews trained to CAA standards to act as emergency cover, these people will usually have other jobs as well on the airfield. I would far rather have trained staff on site who can attend rather than waiting for someone to dial 999 and wait for the fire service to come out.

    in reply to: Blenheim Accident #2092042
    Yak 11 Fan
    Participant

    Whether they have or they haven’t isn’t any of our concern I would just like to send my best wishes to the team.

    in reply to: Look who we found yesterday!!!!!!!! #2092268
    Yak 11 Fan
    Participant

    You clearly have no taste EN830

    in reply to: Wreck Vs Restoration #2092462
    Yak 11 Fan
    Participant

    I know it’s late, but I can’t see the difference between something which was damaged in the 1990’s and rebuilt and something which was damaged in the 1940’s and has been stored since and then rebuilt, both machines existed, both machines would have suffered extensive damage and most likely had the same amount of work go into them. Just because one has been in hiding for 50 years doesn’t make it any less genuine.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,496 through 3,510 (of 4,023 total)