Best of luck guys, hope you have a fantastic day.
Best of luck guys, hope you have a fantastic day.
Well thats just great, we seem to have hacked off somebody who knows what they are talking about, thats a great shame as I’m sure we could have learnt a lot from that gentleman 🙁
I have watched the Frightening Blighters on a number of occasions and undoubtably they are spectacular, however I am not keen on their display due to the fact that they are so close together. I fall into the camp of enjoying the more sedate warbird displays from a personal preference however I fail to see how an out right ban on Warbird Aerobatics will significantly change things.
I fear the only example of a Whirlwind we will see fly is one with it’s propellors on it’s head, and the only flying TSR2 will be if the IWM decide to hang it from the roof after all.
There is an airworthy Firefly in America with a couple of others being restored, a Mk1 project was recently advertised for sale in Sweden and there are the two former Ethiopian aircraft in South africa that periodically get advertised. On top of this I understad there are one or two under restoration in Australia.
Originally posted by DazDaMan
Supposing G-BPIV was too badly damaged to be rectified quickly, could G-MKIV be made to fly again?
G-MKIV suffered far greater damage than it would appear that G-BPIV suffered.
That would most likely be the IWM’s example that ARCO were rebuilding and putting into a yellow RCAF scheme. This is the other airframe that Ormond Haydon Baillie brought to the UK which suffered some damage at Harwich docks. As I understand it this has been the property of the IWM for some years now.
Originally posted by mike currill
Bit of a difference though, the hurricane is “only” rag and tube construction not metal skinned
Not strictly correct as on all current Hurricanes the wings are metal skinned and LF363 suffered extensive wing damage.
You make it sound easy to rebuild a Hurricane.
Originally posted by A330Crazy
As Ashley says what are the things in the 5th picture???
I think they may be a pair of Rutan Varieze things, looks like they have been left out in the sun to long and have melted.
Originally posted by mike currill
If you care to check I think you will find that either this one or her predecessor flew witha Mk I nose and I am pretty certain it was G-BPIV (this one). I actually have a photo somewhere of it.
I’d love to see the photo as last time I saw the Mk1 nose it was still being rebuilt, I know I’ve not been around Duxford as much recently as I had in previous years, but I’d be very suprised if this did happen.
Doughnut by name, Doughnut by nature.
Originally posted by Midway
The ‘security team’ are trained to operate fire appliances and to rescue crew from burning wrecks are they? I wonder what the Fire Brigades Union have to say about that. As we heard so often last year, fire fighting is a specialised job carried out by firemen.
Who Cares!!!!!! This is not the place to introduce this debate.
It is generally standard practice for airfields to have fire crews trained to CAA standards to act as emergency cover, these people will usually have other jobs as well on the airfield. I would far rather have trained staff on site who can attend rather than waiting for someone to dial 999 and wait for the fire service to come out.
Whether they have or they haven’t isn’t any of our concern I would just like to send my best wishes to the team.
You clearly have no taste EN830
I know it’s late, but I can’t see the difference between something which was damaged in the 1990’s and rebuilt and something which was damaged in the 1940’s and has been stored since and then rebuilt, both machines existed, both machines would have suffered extensive damage and most likely had the same amount of work go into them. Just because one has been in hiding for 50 years doesn’t make it any less genuine.