It was fun, although it seemed like hardwork at the time.
Were you at Woodchurch the other week by any chance Janie?
Of course there will be a difference between something that has sat outside for years and something that has been operated continuously. You would expect to have to undertake major work, however if people weren’t prepared to carry out this kind of work the line up at Leg Ends would be somewhat empty. I’ll let you tell some of these guys that their aircraft have dubious histories and are in fact new build, I’ll be hiding behind a substantial structure so as to avoid the fall out.
Did you see MH434 during it’s overhaul?
A major overhaul it might have been, but it was pretty extensive, as ARCO thenselves say on their site ‘the airframe was completely dismantled down to it’s individual components and all stripped to bare metal. Each panel, frame, stringer and every rivet was meticulously inspected and replaced as necessary, the bulkhead and firewall being totally rebuilt and all the components overhauled individually. This famous Spitfire emerged from ARCo’s workshops ‘better than new’.
We noticed Tom, how is your hearing?
Yes she was elsewhere
Best wishes to the Blenheim team, hope everybody is OK
Originally posted by Snapper
I was lost. Then I was found. Perhaps it’s the same with Janie. Was it en-route to Damascus? Enquiring minds wish to know.So who thought she was missing? And when? Where did they look?
Nope it was en-route to Diss.
a small portion of the Leg Ends crowd failed to see her, but they looked no further than the flightline, after all the world revolves around that.
So are we now saying that all recently restored warbirds are ‘new build’?
I can accept it with the FW190’s and Me262’s as there were no original aircraft that were used in the project, and they have different engines etc.
Some thought she was missing, others new better.
Perhaps the IWM could do that with the Shackleton, at least that way it gets to keep its wings.
Nope
As far as I am concerned these aircraft, particularly the Hurricanes contain as much servicable original material as safety will allow. Everything else is made to original specifications from material which is as good if not better than it would have been in the 30’s and 40’s. All of this has been very carefully researched to ensure the aircraft are as accurately rebuilt as possible even down to the way the interior of the aircraft is painted, an area that only the very privileged will ever get to see.
To say any of these are ‘new build’ would be a huge insult to the highly skilled craftsmen who spend a huge amount of time and money building these aircraft.
Originally posted by David Burke
As for information on which Hurricane’s and Spitfire’s are largely 1990’s built well I think the best way to find out is to look for the ones that never seem to feature a ‘before’ and ‘after’
picture in the rebuild articles.
So we can’t actually identify any ‘new build’ aircraft then? I’m just interested to know.