YAM’s Lightning
The Yorkshire Air Museum is also doing well. I think XS903
is stored for the most part in their large RCAF Hangar. To bad she
can not be part of their taxible fleet also..would look very nice
next to the Buc and Victor..any one know what kind of condition XS903 is in .. complete..etc?
What about Cosford’s example..sure it might look pretty
rough on the outside but it might be complete? anyone
seen inside that one? and it will someday be preserved
indoors or undercover someday(hopefully soon)
Does Duxford control the humidity/heat in their hangars? I know it can get pretty cold in them in the colder months?
What are most of the major components make of in the Vulcan airframe? are they more corrision prone than say your average
WWII airframe….
How many years did Duxford’s Vulcan (XJ824) spend outside before settling into the Superhangar?
Not sure how the boys are getting around the H & S concerns
for their instruments on their Halifax. Were all WWII instruments
treated with radiation during the that time period. I have heard
some restoration groups have had the instrument make safe
for use? (taken apart and replaced with new non radioactive backings) but not sure about this one!!
I was considering the use of a tri or mono pod for my camera last weekend but I am still in experiment mode with my Dig camera. My camera is limited to 25-200mm true opitical zoom so ground to air shot are a stretch..I tired combining the opitcal with the digital zoom but it sucked badly..The winds were a challenge yes!
Slow ground to air are good but limited by my lenses.
Those air to air pictures sound great. I would love to see them also.
I posted a few pictures here of the Flight Fest to raise a little interest in our local air scene. I really would like to see interest
grow in Canada’s avaition history. Many smaller restoration groups around Canada work with very little publicity these days so I figure get the work out there to the “aero nuts” as you call them.
I saw a number of aircraft being treated like jungle gyms over the weekend and most aircraft owners or groups were doing their best allow the visitors a close up look at these fine planes,,but you do have to treat these old girls with respect..some are getting quite old and should be looked at but not touched(poked)
Mr Potter was very polite in allowing myself and couple of other plane geeks to photograph his plane up close.
Early on Saturday morning I was able to get close up to Potter’s Spitfire. He was quite tolerant of all the questions and all the people around the plane. I did ask his permission to shot the interior shots and I managed to take about four pix. But by the time I had left him he was asking for help in getting some police tape to set up safe area around his aircraft. I can not blame him as many folks were pooking around alittle too much for my comfort level..
The static display was alittle confusing on Sat but they seemed to
figure it out by Sunday. They closed the static area to the public by noonish.
So many people had come in on Saturday without paying much more that parking $2 cost..cheap bums. The security had to walk the grounds asking for proof of admission..they had 175 non paying people by the time they asked me..It doesn’t help an airshow when you don’t pay to support it!!
I paid twice:) Sat and Sun
Thanks for info Olivier I will keep a look out on the WIX Forum for details on your next landings!!:)
Was the Fairchild Cornell just a static display? It belongs to the CWHM correct? She looks mint. I just managed to see her leave on Sunday morning.
A quick question to anyone..are all aircraft performers invited to the show? and are they all paid to display ot trade for fuel? and if you were lucky enough to own a warbird..could you arrive and static display at the airshow like Olivier FW did? what do most shows do these days?
I did photograph her again on the tarmac on Sunday. She looked great. I even managed some close ups of her cockpit.(from a distance)
Too bad you could not have been in the show…:)
T-28C
Stagger Wing:
FW-149