dark light

British Canuck

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 556 through 570 (of 792 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: lightning survivors #2082477
    British Canuck
    Participant

    YAM’s Lightning

    The Yorkshire Air Museum is also doing well. I think XS903
    is stored for the most part in their large RCAF Hangar. To bad she
    can not be part of their taxible fleet also..would look very nice
    next to the Buc and Victor..any one know what kind of condition XS903 is in .. complete..etc?

    in reply to: Best Vulcan #2084653
    British Canuck
    Participant

    What about Cosford’s example..sure it might look pretty
    rough on the outside but it might be complete? anyone
    seen inside that one? and it will someday be preserved
    indoors or undercover someday(hopefully soon)

    in reply to: Best Vulcan #2084707
    British Canuck
    Participant

    Does Duxford control the humidity/heat in their hangars? I know it can get pretty cold in them in the colder months?

    in reply to: Best Vulcan #2085935
    British Canuck
    Participant

    What are most of the major components make of in the Vulcan airframe? are they more corrision prone than say your average
    WWII airframe….

    in reply to: Best Vulcan #2085939
    British Canuck
    Participant

    How many years did Duxford’s Vulcan (XJ824) spend outside before settling into the Superhangar?

    in reply to: Halifax NA337 RCAF Museum Trenton #2086004
    British Canuck
    Participant

    Not sure how the boys are getting around the H & S concerns
    for their instruments on their Halifax. Were all WWII instruments
    treated with radiation during the that time period. I have heard
    some restoration groups have had the instrument make safe
    for use? (taken apart and replaced with new non radioactive backings) but not sure about this one!!

    in reply to: Seeking airshow advice – use of tripods #2088410
    British Canuck
    Participant

    I was considering the use of a tri or mono pod for my camera last weekend but I am still in experiment mode with my Dig camera. My camera is limited to 25-200mm true opitical zoom so ground to air shot are a stretch..I tired combining the opitcal with the digital zoom but it sucked badly..The winds were a challenge yes!

    Slow ground to air are good but limited by my lenses.

    in reply to: Ottawa Flight Fest 2003 #2088846
    British Canuck
    Participant

    Those air to air pictures sound great. I would love to see them also.

    I posted a few pictures here of the Flight Fest to raise a little interest in our local air scene. I really would like to see interest
    grow in Canada’s avaition history. Many smaller restoration groups around Canada work with very little publicity these days so I figure get the work out there to the “aero nuts” as you call them.

    I saw a number of aircraft being treated like jungle gyms over the weekend and most aircraft owners or groups were doing their best allow the visitors a close up look at these fine planes,,but you do have to treat these old girls with respect..some are getting quite old and should be looked at but not touched(poked)

    Mr Potter was very polite in allowing myself and couple of other plane geeks to photograph his plane up close.

    in reply to: Ottawa Flight Fest 2003 #2089054
    British Canuck
    Participant

    Early on Saturday morning I was able to get close up to Potter’s Spitfire. He was quite tolerant of all the questions and all the people around the plane. I did ask his permission to shot the interior shots and I managed to take about four pix. But by the time I had left him he was asking for help in getting some police tape to set up safe area around his aircraft. I can not blame him as many folks were pooking around alittle too much for my comfort level..

    The static display was alittle confusing on Sat but they seemed to
    figure it out by Sunday. They closed the static area to the public by noonish.

    So many people had come in on Saturday without paying much more that parking $2 cost..cheap bums. The security had to walk the grounds asking for proof of admission..they had 175 non paying people by the time they asked me..It doesn’t help an airshow when you don’t pay to support it!!

    I paid twice:) Sat and Sun

    in reply to: Ottawa Flight Fest 2003 #2089090
    British Canuck
    Participant

    Thanks for info Olivier I will keep a look out on the WIX Forum for details on your next landings!!:)

    in reply to: Ottawa Flight Fest 2003 #2089102
    British Canuck
    Participant

    Was the Fairchild Cornell just a static display? It belongs to the CWHM correct? She looks mint. I just managed to see her leave on Sunday morning.

    A quick question to anyone..are all aircraft performers invited to the show? and are they all paid to display ot trade for fuel? and if you were lucky enough to own a warbird..could you arrive and static display at the airshow like Olivier FW did? what do most shows do these days?

    in reply to: Ottawa Flight Fest 2003 #2089118
    British Canuck
    Participant

    I did photograph her again on the tarmac on Sunday. She looked great. I even managed some close ups of her cockpit.(from a distance)

    Too bad you could not have been in the show…:)

    in reply to: Ottawa Flight Fest 2003 #2089203
    British Canuck
    Participant

    T-28C

    in reply to: Ottawa Flight Fest 2003 #2089206
    British Canuck
    Participant

    Stagger Wing:

    in reply to: Ottawa Flight Fest 2003 #2089211
    British Canuck
    Participant

    FW-149

Viewing 15 posts - 556 through 570 (of 792 total)