dark light

kfeltenberger

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 187 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • kfeltenberger
    Participant

    That claim about the Boeing 707 is correct. But the designers had not in mind, that someone would accellerate an airliner of that size at high speed into it, without a single attempt to avoid a frontal crash. 😮
    The airliners landing at the city airports are at 200 kt and some 1000 feet higher-up.

    Another issue was that most of the protective asbestos had been removed that kept the structure from weakening from the heat generated by the burning fuel.

    kfeltenberger
    Participant

    You can apply that for everything, that all claims by designers are PR stunts also for the F-22……:D and Thank God, they did not build two Titanics. 😀

    Actually, they built three;

    RMS Olympic
    RMS Titanic
    RMS Britannic

    😉

    in reply to: KC767, KC45 ….. Latest news! #2475157
    kfeltenberger
    Participant

    Sounds like EADS recognizes that without supports in the DOD willing & able to further alter the requirements to accomodate the KC-30, that it is unlikely to win because even it knows that the KC-30 is the wrong tanker for the USAF just as “everyone” did in 2002.

    How can “everyone” have known “it was the wrong tanker…in 2002” when the blasted thing wasn’t even proposed and the Boeing deal was essentially a back room, done deal without a public RFP and bid?

    in reply to: The best aircraft to chase UFO #2479016
    kfeltenberger
    Participant

    I nominate Firebar and a MiG-25.

    😀

    in reply to: Guess the Ship- Modern Navy #2071744
    kfeltenberger
    Participant

    The second from the left, is that one of the UK’s Invincible class CVs?

    in reply to: the greatest raf aircraft of all time! #2484376
    kfeltenberger
    Participant

    I don’t know if it’s the “greatest”, but it’s certainly my favorite; the Buccaneer. It’s performance in the S.2B version was very credible and the RAF lost a chance to make it truly world beating by giving it a comprehensive avionics and cockpit upgrade, not to mention buying more of them. I saw a “what if” where it was in USMC colors and often wondered what would have developed had the US bought it back in the 60s.

    in reply to: New fighter for Georgia #2487953
    kfeltenberger
    Participant

    I would still like to hear from you two .. how do you solve the problem of two seperatist states in arms… when you bring Georgia into NATO??

    Maybe I’m missing something, but South Ossetia Abkhazia (Abkhazan? 😉 ) are part of Georgia as viewed by the UN. Isn’t this similar to the Basque separatists, albeit with more weapons and foreign (Russian) support?

    in reply to: Georgia invades South Ossetia #2492320
    kfeltenberger
    Participant

    15 Russian peacekeepers died, that’s reason enough.

    Or is there some elaborate excuse for that too?

    And how many peacekeepers have died on other missions without their nation going bonkers and invading where the peacekeepers were stationed? Really.

    If Russia had stopped when Georgia withdrew from S. Ossetia, I’d be willing to cut some slack, but they haven’t. They’re still going full bore and now they’re hitting civilian targets.

    Making this relevant to aviation: All the civilian damage doesn’t say much for the accuracy or training of the Russian forces…unless it was on purpose. It’s pretty hard to mistake an apartment complex for a purely military target.

    IMO, of course.

    in reply to: Georgia invades South Ossetia #2492361
    kfeltenberger
    Participant

    I didn’t know the US military was targeting Canadians in the US as of late. :rolleyes:

    It makes as much sense as Russia granting citizenship to Georgian citizens so they have a perceived reason to invade.

    in reply to: Georgia invades South Ossetia #2492439
    kfeltenberger
    Participant

    If Georgia was a NATO member, there wouldn’t have been Russian troops stationed inside Georgia, so Georgia wouldn’t have any reason to try to evict them.

    Russian peacekeepers would always be in South Ossetia even if Georgia became part of NATO. Russians are there to protect Russians in South Ossetia.

    So by this reasoning, should Canada send it’s troops to the US to protect Canadian citizens in the US?

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2453933
    kfeltenberger
    Participant

    Huh?

    I found this comment on a blog posted on the Georgia Invades thread and was somewhat surprised by it.

    “Likely also under way towards the Persian Gulf is the USS Iwo Jima (LHD-7) and its expeditionary strike group, the UK Royal Navy HMS Ark Royal (R07) carrier battle group, assorted French naval assets including the nuclear hunter-killer submarine Amethyste and French Naval Rafale fighter jets on-board the USS Theodore Roosevelt. These ships took part in the just completed Operation Brimstone.”

    http://europebusines.blogspot.com/2008/08/massive-us-naval-armada-heads-for-iran.html

    I knew we were cross decking 12F’s Rafales for qualifications, but I wasn’t aware that we were going to take them on an operational deployment.

    Or is this more along the lines of the blogger not really knowing what’s going on?

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2454604
    kfeltenberger
    Participant

    It wasn’t Red Flag.

    Rafale did go there so as to train before Red Flag.

    ___________________________

    It seems that finally, the Rafale will do only air-to-air missions in Red Flag, though originally assigned to both A2A and A2G.

    Thanks!

    Kurt

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2454801
    kfeltenberger
    Participant

    Was this Red Flag? The map they showed indicated it happened in Phoenix, AZ, not outside of Las Vegas at Nellis.

    Thanks!

    Kurt

    in reply to: Ground Breaking Fighter #2458813
    kfeltenberger
    Participant

    That’s a funny one. Of course I’d hardly expect you to be objective. The Mig-25 was a response to the Blackbird hence the Mach 3 speed and large missiles.

    I thought I read somewhere that the MiG-25 was originally developed to combat the XB-70 when it went operational.

    in reply to: Super Etendard in air combat #2458814
    kfeltenberger
    Participant

    Regarding whether the warhead of the Exocet that hit HMS Sheffield exploded or not, I’ve watched some videos of live missiles hitting test ships and it would seem to me, a layman in all this, that the damage on the videos isn’t matched by the damage we see on Sheffield.

    Just one view.

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 187 total)