dark light

Dave Homewood

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,741 through 1,755 (of 4,847 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Films with aircraft names in the titles #1381670
    Dave Homewood
    Participant
    in reply to: Films with aircraft names in the titles #1381671
    Dave Homewood
    Participant
    in reply to: Films with aircraft names in the titles #1381788
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    The Arrow (Canadian miniseries about the Avro Arrow in 1950s Canada)
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118641/

    Bombers B-52 (1957)
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050204/

    Dakota (Netherlands; 1974)
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071386/

    in reply to: Films with aircraft names in the titles #1381818
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Blackhawk Down

    in reply to: Where is this? #1383852
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I am probably wrong but the archetechture reminds my of a railway station

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1385568
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    It’s an Aeroplane (the 1930s version of the mag, like Flight) photo
    HTH

    Actually it’s not a The Aeroplane magazine photo, it is credited to Flight in the publication I got it from. There is also a cutaway below oit of the Anson also credited to Flight, as are all the other RAF photos in the 1938 airshow programme.

    Can someone tell me please when did The Aeroplane and Flight each first go on public sale?

    in reply to: General Discussion #358420
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Apparantly, it was on a quail hunting trip

    Hmm, his predecessor Dan Quayle perhaps? I guess shooting a lawyer is just as good.

    in reply to: Dick Cheney shoots man!!!! #1946242
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Apparantly, it was on a quail hunting trip

    Hmm, his predecessor Dan Quayle perhaps? I guess shooting a lawyer is just as good.

    in reply to: General Discussion #359333
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Ian,

    what’s this forum you refer to? Or is it secret?

    in reply to: The Japanese and WW2 #1946651
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Ian,

    what’s this forum you refer to? Or is it secret?

    in reply to: 109 on Trade-A-Plane #1388954
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    There was discussion on Wix about this some weeks ago and a subsequent post about it indicates the ‘seller’ may be a con all right

    http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6313&sid=f5435c47e738e491937f9b9a40210098

    in reply to: Do you have to be mad to restore a Mossie? #1390102
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks John. I had wondered what they were. I thought maybe the bottom one was a Miles product but it didn’t look right for one of their’s. Cheers. I hope the very old article was of interest.

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1390104
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    unfortunatley the wife insists on having the bedroom decorated.

    Do they make wallpaper with B-17’s on? 😀

    That is a great replica, outstanding mate! Well done.

    in reply to: Do you have to be mad to restore a Mossie? #1392915
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I wonder if this May 1943 article from Contact, the Official Magazine of the RNZAF, is of any interest regarding the building of aircaft from plywood at that time?

    http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f224/DaveHomewood/Woodenplanes.jpg
    http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f224/DaveHomewood/WoodenPlanes2.jpg
    http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f224/DaveHomewood/WoodenPlanes3.jpg

    in reply to: Concorde rotting away #1394509
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Scrap some? What a ridiculously stupid idea!

    Concorde is universally known, it is a worldwide household name and has been since the 1970’s. I remember the great thrill of actully seeing one at Heathrow in 1993, standing out among the sea of broing Boeings. And stepping aboard the one at Duxford was just as powerful a feeling, actually touching and smelling and seeing a true design classic – in fact a prototype too, wow.

    Though Concordes visited these shores only a handful of times, virtually everyone I know, everyone in NZ, we on the opposite side of the world from where they operated, knows what a Concorde is. It’s as well known as a Spitfire and a Lancaster. In fact perhaps better than the latter.

    The point is, the very idea of scrapping some of the preserved examples simply because they are otdoors is ludicrous, simply proposterous. Have you not considered that airliners spend almost all their life outdoors? They are built for outdoor storage. How often do they go into hangarage while in service? Not a lot. So, what’s the problem here? They can be stored outdoors till a building can be arranged. Is it simply you lot don’t like going outside in the cold to look at it???

    Have you also not considered that if it is outdoors at a museum, and the museum staff are too lazy to clean it or whatever, it’s being abused or neglected, then rather than scrapping the aircraft, it could be sold or passed on to somewhere where it will be appreciated? I’m sure there would be museums and collections across the globe from Asia, the Middle East, the USA and downunder who’d give their all to possess such a potent symbol of technology. I am glad they are all being preserved for the future generations, inoors and outdoors, rather than being melted down to become soft drink cans.

    I’d wager if all but a few were scrapped, the same people proposing the idea now would be winging that not enough were preserved when we had the chance.

    I don’t care whether it ever flies again or not, that’s not the point. Don’t scrap them for *******s sake!

Viewing 15 posts - 1,741 through 1,755 (of 4,847 total)