dark light

Dave Homewood

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,756 through 1,770 (of 4,847 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Do you have to be mad to restore a Mossie? #1394858
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I’m not sure whether to take that bet John. My gut feeling is you just might win. I hope you do.

    in reply to: Do you have to be mad to restore a Mossie? #1394891
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks Bruce. Cool, around 2009 then. Hopefully there’s one flying at least for he type’s 70th anniversary.

    in reply to: Do you have to be mad to restore a Mossie? #1394913
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I would have thought it’s construction was more straightforward? There’s no compound curves, it’s mostly large pieces of wood with moderate single curves or cut to shape… Or am I wrong?

    And lots and lots and lots of little nails

    in reply to: Do you have to be mad to restore a Mossie? #1394918
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Why would you spent thousands of hours/$ rebuilding something that will have a limited life-span?

    Instantly when I read this, I thought of the Vulcan project. That to me is much more mad than any Mosquito project.

    I’ll be happy to wait a few more years if I have to.

    Just wondering, but do you guys think the rebuild by professional restoration companies for millionaires would perhaps speed the process up a little compared with restorations by museums who lack that type of funding, etc? Is three more years a realistic estimate on this basis? (not quibling, I really don’t know myself)

    in reply to: Do you have to be mad to restore a Mossie? #1395111
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I didn’t think anyone here was having a go at Glynn. Just some people may not be aware of the years and money and dedication he put into this just to get the project off the ground. It’s worth mentioning for those here who don’t know.

    in reply to: Do you have to be mad to restore a Mossie? #1395123
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I picked up a copy of New Zealand Aviation News today which has a photo of the Jerry Yagen Mossie fuselage sitting at AvSpecs, Ardmore, where it has been having its systems fitted since before Christmas. It states “The wing section is under construction in the workshop of Glynn Powell” so there is a wing underway now.

    Glynn Powell is using modern glues which are apparently better for the job and for longevity. Don’t forget regarding wooden aircraft, the military may have dumped the practice long ago, as did airlines, but building wooden planes has always and remains popular among the Sport Aviation fraternity, homebuilders, etc. They continue to prove new technologies, and I’m sure that they have tested post-war glues well enough.

    DHFan – it took him this long because he had to do it all himself, raising the funds, etc when everyone else who knew it all were saying it couldn’t be done. Now that it’s all go, everyone says “Why’s it taking so long?” Good on him for sticking with the project through thick and thin. It’s now a year since I last visited Glynn’s factory and the progress made between times is remarkable having seen what they began with. I think we shall see the results within the next year or so, a Mosquito lifting off from Ardmore. That’ll make everyone sit up and notice.

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1395735
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks Peter.

    in reply to: Who was this Spitfire pilot? + Weird Spitfire markings #1395887
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks everyone for the input and theories on this. I have learned a lot about the prewar Spitfire schemes i never knew. Are we agreed there are no wing roundels on it? I note none are seen on the uderside in the profile Neil posted either.

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1397639
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I’m assuming ti’s Finnish – the swatztikas were what made me suspect (and it’s prewar so not captured).

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1397648
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I don’t know if thgis one has been seen before, I scanned this from the June 1938 programme to the RNZAF Display at Rongotai. A Finnish-marked Anson I believe, not too far off the ground.

    http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f224/DaveHomewood/LowAnson.jpg

    in reply to: Who was this Spitfire pilot? + Weird Spitfire markings #1397694
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    At last, here is the photo. It did scan reasonably ok in the end without wrecking the 65 year old binding.

    http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f224/DaveHomewood/Spitfire54Sqn1939.jpg

    in reply to: US pilots breaking neutrality #1397826
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks Entropy.

    In your car? Not a safe place to keep it mate.

    in reply to: US pilots breaking neutrality #1398026
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Great to see you back here posting Steve.

    That sounds like an interesting programme.

    in reply to: US pilots breaking neutrality #1398194
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Something of interest to me is I was given the entire volume collection of RNZAF Contact magazines for the war last week. In the early 1941 editions, starting abou April, there is mentions of Roosevelt joining the Allies and his people backing the effort to stop Hitler, etc. This must have been jubilation after the signing of the Lend Lease deal, as it’s clearly before they entered the war properly.

    in reply to: Some Temora Aviation Aircraft Images #1399691
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Lovely photos Glenn. Thanks for sharing them here.

    Did the Hudson fly that day?

    Also, that Harvard in erico’s photo is beautiful. Is it perchance one of many the ex-RNZAF Harvards in Australia?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,756 through 1,770 (of 4,847 total)