dark light

Dave Homewood

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,761 through 2,775 (of 4,847 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: TFC Curtis Hawk 75 arrives at DX #1350012
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Is that P36 the only one airworthy at the moment? It looks interesting.

    It’ll be good when the Omaka based Luftwaffe one is up in the air too.

    The P40 is an excellent display fighter. I had the great joy of seeing Mark Hanna take Sir Tim Wallis’s P40K aloft on several occasions, including its first flight in 50 years, and I’ve also seen John Lamont display it very well. I think it is much more interesting to watch than a Mustang, though the P51D sounds a bit better.

    The type as a fighter was excellent in the right hands. The RAAF did well with the type, as did the RAF. The RNZAF found it to be a very good fighter against the Japanese, shooting down 100 Japs confirmed and 14 probables in a few short months between going operational and converting to Corsairs. That figure of 100 enemy kills is to just 20 P40 losses in action – at least one of which was lost to a US aircraft bombing it. Many other RNZAF P40 pilots were attacked by US Corsairs and P38’s etc during engagements because the yanks shot at everyone, but most of the time the kiwis out manouvred them and escaped.

    They were purely used as escort fighters, not ground attack then.They were later used at OTU’s in NZ before converting pilots onto Corsairs, and they proved very good work horses in that role too.

    in reply to: 'Big Bird' ? at Duxford. #1350024
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    What is the idea of it being all black? Did they make torpedo raids at night? If so, where?

    Looks stunning.

    in reply to: More donated RAF fighters #1350197
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks Paul, well that is a different spelling from all the references I have, which all state Bouey, not Booy. My references come from many different sources, so I wonder if the Times made a typo, or if everyone else did. I will look further into Mr J.M. de Booy though, cheers mate.

    in reply to: General Discussion #362269
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Though Dad had owned a series of old Atari and Commodores like the 64 beforehand which I’d used, I bought my first one, a Commodore Amiga, off my mate in 1993. I had it six months, only ever played games on it, and then sold it to another mate for exactly what I paid. So that was cool.

    My next computer came in about 2000, which was built from spare parts and bits from the bin in my mate’s computer workshop. In all, it cost me $10 – no bull. That’s 3 quid! It lasted over a year before I saved up and upgraded to my current much better one. The only problem with the $10 PC was it thought the year was about 1286AD and it wouldn’t change!!

    in reply to: Has Ray Hannah's Yak flown? #1351082
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I’ve looked at the IMDb sites for Dench, Kidman and Jackson and none mention anything about the film, though both ladies have many upcoming films. I hope this isn’t a hoax.

    in reply to: Has Ray Hannah's Yak flown? #1351106
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Hi Dave

    Article on German TV (satellite here inAus) saying the movie is a Goer and that Judy Dench (Dame) and Nicole Kidman were two of the Stars and that a fleet of 40 aircraft was to be involved ?

    Regards
    John P

    Really? Wow. Excellent.

    40 planes. Hmm, interesting. I guess what’s left of the AFC Polikarpov fleet here in NZ will appear, and a Yak or two (if the Omaka one/s get flying by then to maybe join the OFMC one). There’s the La-9 of course, that’d be a real star. 🙂

    I wonder what else? DC3’s and Catalina dressed up perhpas? That’d be good if the Cat finally got a nose turret. Maybe P40’s too.

    Is there still one of those ugly single engine radial powered Russian WWII biplane transport things in NZ? There used to be.

    And they’d need some Germans I guess. It would be great seeing some Bf109’s or Fw190’s scooting over the Otago tundra.

    It poses a really interesting prospect for both the film industry and the airshow scene in NZ for whichever months it is made. We’ve never had an aviation epic made in NZ yet (that I can think of).

    I can well picture Nicole Kidman in flying kit, but not Dench. I’ll bet she’ll have her hair in buns and be the Rosa Krantz-style battleaxe boss. 😀

    in reply to: Has Ray Hannah's Yak flown? #1351256
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I suspect if the film that Peter Jackson is meant to be going to mkae soon about women in the Russian Air Force is still going ahead, it may remain in NZ for that (or perhaps return) as the OFMC is meant to be involved in that project. Purle rumours and media talk, so if this is worng, I apologise. I hope it is made though.

    DaveM2 was talking recently about how Ray Hanna is building a new hangar for this aircraft at Wanaka, if I recall right.

    in reply to: General Discussion #362296
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Well I think you’ve missed the point. You said Americans don’t get things “like references to towns and the people that live there” and things like that in British TV. I guess you mean stuff like the slang they use, and proper words too as Americnas use a vastly different version of the language. Also political and social references or topical stuff may go over your head if you are unaware of certain movements happening in the UK when it was made. I understand what you’re saying I think.

    What my point was is you can pick this stuff up, understand it and build a knowledge base about that culture, the language, the slang, the political leaders, where places are, etc, by watching their TV more, rather than simply remaking a translated dumbed-down closed-minded version for yourselves that often misiterprets the entire reason for the show in the first place simply because of the reasons you were trying to point out.

    in reply to: General Discussion #362300
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    There are some parts of “The Office” that are beyond the US realm of knowledge, like references to towns and the people that live there. Don’t you think the US would find it funnier if such references were made about US towns?

    Yes, but that is the very point I made above…

    If they just bought the original, it’d be a much better show all round compared with a rehashed recast mishmash, and viewers might learn something about other cultures too rather than having to have everything put into their own version of the language and culture.

    I live in New Zealand. I am not British. I am not American. I am not Australian. However with much exposure to all three country’s television output through our local programming I have grasped a very good understanding of these three country’s cultures, styles of humour and also geographic locations, as have most Kiwis who watch TV here. Whereas if all of those shows had been remade here in NZ with Kiwi actors and local references replacing foreign ones simply for our own market, I would have learned nothing about the other countries and missed out on the many and various takes on life. If you see what I mean.

    Or is it that a US audience simply doesn’t want to watch foreign programming and take an interest in the outside world? I’m not trying to flame here, this is something that does make me quite curious. Kiwis are a nation of travellers, we all aspire to see and learn about the rest of the world. Apparently there are a million NZ’ers outisde NZ and 4 million in it at any given time! (so TV tells me). Most of us at some point have travelled abroad, despite it being more costly for us to do so than any other western nations.

    I think we all want to see the world these days because we are an isolated nation but we’ve experienced so much of the globe through our TV’s and we want to experience the different lifestyles and cultures we see, if only to compare it with our own and realise we “don’t know how lucky we are” as the popular Kiwi song goes (Fred Dagg 🙂 ).

    Can you see where I am coming from? Seeing difference is learning. Immersing yourself in difference is understanding. But shutting out difference, censoring it, leads to a lack of learning anything, so understanding will never be reached. Vive le difference (even if it is French 😀 )

    in reply to: General Discussion #362316
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Hey Moggy, I was merely repeating what this scientist said. He emphatically stated the DU weapons were weapons of mass destruction, despite not being recognised as such.

    Either way, the use of them should be banned – I mean, much less harmful weapons like dum dum bullets have been banned – why not these extremely destructive and harmful weapons? Still, why not use questionable weaponry when you wage questionable wars I suppose.

    in reply to: RAF in Maine #1351985
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    What does TDY mean??

    in reply to: The first Consolidated Liberator to arrive in Britain #1351990
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks for looking out that info Peter. Much appreciated.

    in reply to: Is this the way to Amarillo? #1351991
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks. Interesting, so one at Breighton, one at Dayton, where are the other two? One’s in France, isn’t it? I’ve always liked the PR XI, might be because of the colour schemes, PRU blue and PRU pink look good on a Spit.

    in reply to: More donated RAF fighters #1352002
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    At least one was a Typhoon!

    See:

    http://www.sturtivant.freeserve.co.uk/spitfire/

    eh? Which one? I think you may be confused Paul, I’m looking for de Bouey, not de Bruyne.

    in reply to: Is this the way to Amarillo? #1352394
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Wow, some lovely shots there Mark. Very nice. Looks very cold.

    Has anything been done with the Spitfire since? How many PR XI’s exist these days?

Viewing 15 posts - 2,761 through 2,775 (of 4,847 total)