dark light

Dave Homewood

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,986 through 3,000 (of 4,847 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: So he's here then #1424633
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Has Patty got his thermals with him?

    Is the Rearwin a glider then? 😀

    I think perhaps, with all this snow outside and coffee inside, a thermos is a more appropriate piece of luggage

    I wish you the very best of success for the flight of your beautiful restoration Melvyn. Don’t forget in the flight check beforehand to remove the pitot cover though, otherwise it may be frozen chicken for dinner.

    in reply to: Prewar British Engine Names #1425453
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Another interesting fact is how names get recycled. Especially in the USA.

    There have been several different naval aircraft called the Corsair and the Helldiver.

    The Typhoon in Britain is another case.

    I’m sure there was an old ungainly Vimy-style airliner of the 1920’s also called Britannia, wasn;t there? Or am I thinking of an individual nickname rather than a product name?

    in reply to: Prewar British Engine Names #1426117
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    So this thing of naming US aircraft after US places, what about the Hudson and the Ventura? I know the former is a famous river, and the latter is a famous boulevard (and county?) but were these Lockheed names, or RAF names? After all, they were both designed specifically for the RAF. I mean, the Hudson could just as easily have been the Super Electra bomber. Sounds like a vacuum cleaner.

    Wht does Anson mean? Is that a city in the UK too?

    I love some of the old 1920’s and 1930’s airliner names, Britannia, Hyderabad, Victoria… so empirical

    I like Hawker’s series, Hurricane, Tornado, Typhoon, Tempest… all windy – but what about the Hotspur, that’s definately straight from the boy’s comic I reckon.

    in reply to: General Discussion #372268
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Cheers Andy.

    I’d have loved to go there, now it doesn’t seem worth it. The road you mention is pretty wide now thanks to this rather foolish effort, and the beach in the area they showed is virtually gone. It looks like a slip, a landslide, but it is manmade!!

    They say they had to widen the road for the tourists. Kiwis and Aussies have been going there for many, many decades, as have many other people from all round the world. It had remained virtually as it was left when our armies withdrew. My sister visited in the 1980’s and said rifle shells could still be seen on the ground. All those tourists, millions probably, had the respect to not damage that sacred site. Now a council or government blunder has ruined it.

    Of all places in the world, that tiny stretch of coastline stands very much in the hearts of Kiwis and Aussies as something very special. It is where our two countries acheived true nationhood. As I said, I have never been there, but I have heard and seen and read so much about that place. It is a really deep, ingrained part of our national culture, one that I am immensely proud of. I have a book detailing what the men from my town did in WWI, many of them fought on those beaches, a number of them died there. My Great-Great-Uncle fought there, and lived. he was wonded three times before he died on Flanders Fields in 1917.

    I have heard from lots of Kiwis who’ve made the pilgrimage, even those who don’t go to Anzac Day services here, etc, that the place is so very special, and it has an atmosphere all of its own. People feel a presence there. A strong sensation. I have heard people have experience a simliar thing when visiting the death camps like Auschwitz. I guess it is a psychological thing when a place and the events that happened there are so deeply ingrained in ones psyche. I hope they can restore it, but I don’t think it will be the same.

    And we thought it was bad when the Aussies wanted John Farnham to sing there!!

    in reply to: Prewar British Engine Names #1426640
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Why did the Fleet Air Arm call aircraft form the USa that did have names already by different names? I am thinking of the Avenger – named by its manufacturer to avenge the Pearl Harbor attacks (they called it Tarpon, then in 1944 or so switched back to Avenger) – and Wildcat (they called it a Martlet).

    Was this simply to be different? I’ve never understood this.

    in reply to: Help please to ID this plane #1427044
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Here’s a harder one. What on earth is this aircraft? The photo is dated 11th of January 1943, and the place is Guadalcanal. The only thing I could think of is it might be a Hudson Mk V but I am stumped. Is it an American plane?

    in reply to: Help please to ID this plane #1428727
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks. I thought so.

    in reply to: What?? Motat owned part of a Zero?? #1429739
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    So Itake it no-one else knew about the Zero either? I wonder if it was on loan from Charles Darby or someone like that?

    in reply to: Patterson World Tour – Photo guide #1429962
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Cheers John. So you did get to Wanaka then. Did you go by youself?

    Daz, Mike Subritzky said the Spitfire is basically complete now except for an engine overhaul and prop overhaul. He said they have another Merlin that they can drop in it if they wanted, but he said they’re not too interested in getting it flying right now because they’re full time restoring the first of the Hinds.

    in reply to: General Discussion #373047
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    5. Crows and jays have the highest IQ among birds.

    Flood

    Hmm, I’ve heard otherwise. An international study of all intelligent animals, run by some university in the UK, found that New Zeaalnd’s mountain parrot the Kea was the most itelligent of all creatures (above the dolphin which came second). The tests involved performing set tasks as well as simply studying their day to day habits.

    Most people in NZ would agree, they certainly are clever little buggers, and I’d definately wager that a Kea could out-think a Crow in a contest

    in reply to: Patterson World Tour – Photo guide #1430247
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    John, have you got photos from your trip to Motat?

    in reply to: Aircraft Instrument Panel Projects #1431662
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks Robert, really good pictures. Was it still flyng then?

    Are the colours it wears now with the kangaroo on the nose an RAAF scheme or an RAF scheme?

    in reply to: Patterson World Tour – Photo guide #1431675
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    You are too kind though – the Sky Tower at night was because you got me pissed! as usual

    😀

    in reply to: CWH Lanc. #1431743
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    It’s a pity a mega-rich company like Discovery or Sky didn’t get behind this and make a documentary about it all. That would have paid the bills. Sorry to hear it is off, but I’m sure the Canadians will appreciate having their Lanc at home for their own celebrations.

    in reply to: Patterson World Tour – Photo guide #1431774
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I am glad to see that it was not just my photos that came out with that aqua-greenish-blue tinge in the Subritzky’s main hangar. It must have been the colour of the skylights, I never noticed when we were there!

    I love the photo of the Sky Tower with the effects making it look all blurry.

    For those unaware, the photo of Steve pointing to the red jacket – it was decided that this would become the design for the official flight suit of Melvyn’s Rearwin!! And the other things in the case below that Steve is pointing to are dead Kiwis.

    It amazes me how that WWI trench art aircraft model survived, it was rather bulky and I don’t know how the owner managed to keep it through the war and bring it back to NZ.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,986 through 3,000 (of 4,847 total)