dark light

Dave Homewood

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,586 through 3,600 (of 4,847 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aircraft in 80's TV series… #1411587
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    What?? You don’t know ?Fantasy Island”? Every week some b-grade ‘celebs’ and Hollywood has-beens lew into Fantasy Island in a Grumman Widgeon or Goose or something, and this little dude called Tattoo would shout “The plane! The plane!” to his somewhat scary boss, Ricardo Montalban.

    see http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077008/

    The guests all got one wish, guaranteed to come true during their week’s stay. And additionally they usually had one Love Boat-style romance (blrrghh!!) and one typically Yank morale at the end of the story.

    In one great episode a chap wished to fly in combat and he shot down Zeros with a P51D.

    in reply to: Aircraft in 80's TV series… #1411737
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    “Da Plane! Da Plane!”

    Fantasy Island boss.

    in reply to: I have an idea for Duxford… #1411767
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Ah, at last we have the definitive comments from Moggy, hehe. Cheers mate.

    Yes, a few top-class wax-works of Douglas Bader, Keith Park, even Dowding and – dare I suggest – Galland, etc would add to the atmos, along with some of the BofB film characters. I think along with true educational historic figures you’d need to tie in the film characters to get the Hollywood sponsorship.

    Uniforms/costumes for the staff is a bit too much to ask I think, but music and wartime recordings is easily sorted.

    Perhaps when they make the dummies Moggy if you ask very nicely they’ll mould an extra Susanna for you. 😉

    in reply to: Ardmore Airshow – killed by noise complainents? #1412011
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Geese are shot from planes here in NZ, should take it up over there for a sport mate!

    BTW, as far as I’m aware, Greer has absolutely nowt to do with us, thankfully.

    in reply to: I have an idea for Duxford… #1412151
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Cheers James.

    They’ll prrobably think I’m some Colonial idiot, but I don’t mind. It’s probably true!

    Maybe I should contact a few of the cast and get them on my side first, Michael Caine, Lovejoy, that pretty WAAF in suspenders, etc. 😀 A few emails to a few contacts might swing it … (or maybe I shouldn’t be posting straight after the party I went to tonight, hic).

    I still don’t know where to email. Ashley?

    Cheers
    Dave

    in reply to: Ardmore Airshow – killed by noise complainents? #1412165
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Exactly my point Trumper. Thanks. Ardmore was never anywhere near the city when built. The city is encroaching on “it’s” environment. If it were wildlife, the NZ Govt would have protected it by now.

    So, who’s this winging git near Duxford from the best hemisphere then?

    in reply to: Ardmore Airshow – killed by noise complainents? #1412586
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    The V8 decision was disappointing to a lot of people but was not unexpected as there has been a lot of objection to the idea as well as support. The narrow-sighted minority win again, usual story in this country.

    However Wellington is interested in trying to get the race, as are several other cities. Wellington doesn’t need Resource Consent (which is what quashed Auckland’s bid) and the capital also has the experience – they ran the street race for ten years back in the 1980’s-90’s, which was awesome.

    Such events bring in big dollars for the city that hosts it, so I am surprised that Auckland didn’t fight for the race all the way.

    But that’s the same with an airshow, it generates tourism and all sorts of other positive benefits. Ardmore is a long established airshow in a very long established venue, and is a very popular event with the public at large – so I’d hate to think some handful of idiots (who are mostly new arrivals to the region) can see to it that it’s stopped. If they live locally and don’t want a few aircraft buzzing their house, maybe the airport could arrange a free bus trip for them to go away to some very quiet peaceful beach or park for the day. I’m sure there would only be enough objectors to fill a bus anyway!

    in reply to: Can anyone recognise this WWI pilot? #1412599
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    “BUMP”

    Just since the forum’s been down for ages, and someone out there might be able to shed some clues but may not yet have seen this post.

    Dave

    in reply to: WWII Aviation Pubs (2004 thread) #1412800
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Ind Coope Burton Ale was a very popular beer brand on tap in almost every pub when I lived for a short time in Surrey in 1994. I think it still is.

    in reply to: Favourite biplane #1414010
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    You’ve posted some lovely photos on here Mike J. And other people too.

    I like many biplane types, but my favourites are: (in no particular order cos I luv em all)

    DH82 Tiger Moth
    DH83 Fox Moth
    DH60 Moth
    DH86 Express
    DH89 Rapide/Dominie
    Vickers Vincent and Vildebeest
    Fairey Gordon
    Hawker Hind (and many of its cousins)
    Avro 626
    Blackburn Baffin

    in reply to: I have an idea for Duxford… #1414020
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Just resurrecting this thread from a couple of months ago because there are several unresolved issues.

    I’m still keen to learn whether the USAAF had its own ensign (that means flag to non-military peoples) or whether they just used the stars-and-bars of the USA?

    Also, James, did you ever talk to anyone at Duxford about the Batle of Britain film wax dummy idea I had? You mentioned that you would but I haven’t heard owt.

    Moggy, did you see this thread in the end? I’d love to hear your thoughts.

    I never did hear from anyone with a suggestion who to email about the BofB idea. Does anyone know the right person to approach regarding such a display at DX? It would be interesting to hear what they think. I’m sure the MGM/UA would not instantly dismiss the idea of getting involved if it promotes their DVD sales too.

    in reply to: Inter war military biplanes #1414031
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Here’s some larger inter-war biplanes (I assume they’re welcome among the fighters?)

    I might add that though the De Havillands are in civil guise, they all later served in the wartime RNZAF – as frontline (in Fiji) General Reconnaisance bombers! As well as other roles such as communications duties, training aircrew like gunners and wireless ops, etc. They all moved round a fair bit during the war.

    in reply to: Inter war military biplanes #1414061
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Here’s a few “New Zealand Permanent Air Force” and RNZAF biplanes for you John. 🙂

    The photos come from many sources, of which I am not certain.

    in reply to: Question #1414323
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    OK – can we have some explanations please?

    Rigger is a real trade name, not a nickname, unless you RAF lot do things differently. We haven’t had Riggers for decades in NZ.

    I assume a Muscle Mechanic is a PTI? (Physical Training Instructor)

    And I guess a Blanket Stacker is a Barrack Warden (Supplier)?

    What’s a Squipper? Is that Safety Equipment Worker? If so, it’s a new one on me, and that was part of my trade. 🙂

    Also, what are:
    Sumpies
    Fairies
    Plumbers
    scopies

    Some of the better nicknames I recall from my RNZAF days were:

    Cracker Stacker (Armourer)
    Knuck (Strike Pilot – short for Knucklehead due to the bonedome helmet)
    Tucker F*cker (Chef)
    Fitter and Turner (Cook, because they fitted all the food into one big pot and turned it to sh1t)
    Wooden Head (Fireman, because they were all pig stupid, worse than grunts)
    Av Geeks (Avionics Technicians)
    Grocers (Suppliers)
    Blackhands (Aircraft Technicians)

    That’s all I recall right now.

    in reply to: 161 RAF Hudson ops #1415771
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Wow, that is low, less that 123 metres!!!

    I doubt keeping your head down would matter much. It is the canopy that is more likely to come in contact with the tail assembly due to the engine’s slipstream. I wonder if they used extra long static line cords or something.

    Thanks for that info James, it is really scary to think about it. The ground must come up awfully fast at that height, and in the dark over occupied territory, no thanks mate.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,586 through 3,600 (of 4,847 total)