dark light

Dave Homewood

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,601 through 3,615 (of 4,847 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: mystery aircraft #1415801
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    So was it a transport or a bomber? The B-18 designation suggests it’s a bomber, but if so, did it have eight crewmembers? Count the parachutes…

    in reply to: Good God!! #1415938
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Blimey. I assume it’ll be full size?

    A lot of WWII British aircraft instruments and parts have come up very cheap in recent weeks on Trademe.co.nz which is a Kiwi version of ebay. He might pick up something there.

    in reply to: Time for a Southern Hemisphere Airshow #1416105
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    DaveM2 – I didn’t mean anything derogatory towards Omaka’s great efforts, I only meant that the AFC can’t be in two places at once, and Omaka is a better option. Has it really only been three years? Classic Fighters is already so ingrained on the scene I thought it had been longer.

    I remember the Wanaka shows from the ‘odd’ years were usually NZ Fighter Pilots Association events too, weren’t they? That certainly was the case in 1993 when I attended, as they opened the museum that year. And I think that during the 1995 one Phil Murray crashed the P40 too didn’t he? Or was it Tom Middleton in the I153. Not sure now.

    For NZ the “four seasons in one day” situation is also a factor, essentially the weather is far more stable in March and April.

    Quite correct, which is also why most NZ weddings are held in those two months too.

    I think Omaka is probably a great airshow and I’d love to attend it, but it’s difficult and expensive for many North Islanders to get down to both Omaka and Wanaka each year (or either in my case). My only alternative has been Ardmore, but I didn’t get to this year’s and next year it seems there is none???? Doh.

    However the NZ Warbirds site has many more events listed than what Classic Wings magazine lists – I was surprised that CW wasn’t fully comprehensive as they’re usually the best source. There is going to be an RNZAF Whenuapai airshow next year again. And also a DC3 airshow in Wanganui. Plus Mock Attacks at somwhere called Ahipara 20 Flats?? But no Ardmore show. A pity.

    http://www.nzwarbirds.org.nz/events.html

    I realise there is a lot of work organising an airshow, I have worked myself behind the scenes in a couple of the ‘Wigram Wings and Wheels’ shows in the early 1990’s while in the RNZAF, so I admire anyone who can put together an airshow. Despite the huge costs involved and lots of work, there is still an interested public who are keen to pay for the privilege to see all the old warbirds and modern Air Force types displayed, and the costs are easily outweighed by the benefits for the community at large.

    It’s a shame there is no Ardmore show though, they are usually excellent.

    in reply to: Time for a Southern Hemisphere Airshow #1416133
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Steve,

    One good thing about an airshow at Easter is that you might not get as sunburnt standing out there all day as you would if it had been held December/January/February. You have to remember we sit under the Ozone hole and our UV level is 6 x that as at Eyre’s Rock in the Australian desert.

    Wanaka at Easter is only really cold in the early morning, once the sun is up it seems to be ok. I did camp there for an RNZAF Exercise Wise Owl in 1993, two weeks after Easter, and my toothpaste was frozen solid in the tent (among other things!) but by mid morning it was all good.

    There’s usually a great airshow at Ardmore, South Auckland (home of NZ Warbirds) in February but I don’t see one listed for 2005. In fact it does seem like airshows are thin on the ground these days in NZ – we used to have big airshows at the main Air Force bases (Whenuapai, Ohakea and Wigram) in the olden days, plus they used to have them regularly at smaller dromes like Matamata, Hamilton, Mandeville, etc. And Wanaka used to have a show annually, but I guess Omaka has quelled that. As far as shows go, there ain’t much listed in CW for next year. Is it because the fuel’s too expensive these days?

    in reply to: 161 RAF Hudson ops #1416137
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Really interesting topic this one.

    I’m rather surprised James D that your Dad parachuted from the door of a Hudson. Can you please ask him whether it was using a static line chute, or whether they might have used freefall please.

    As parachutes used to be part of my trade in the RNZAF I have some experience with the mechanics of them, so I’d be interested to know how risky jumping from a Hudson door would have been. I’m certain the likelihood of snagging the canopy on the tail was a high risk, and I wonder if they had anti-snag bars attached (you see this on a lot of aircraft – (the RNZAF Andovers had them fitted to the tails for side-door exits). The Hudson door is very near the tail and the tail is very wide. Yikes.

    I’ve read of several incidents where RNZAF Hudsons were no longer capable of flight after combat in the Pacific or running out of fuel and they always seemed to ditch in the sea with crew aboard rather than the crew jumping and abandoning the plane. I don’t know if this is due to their low operational altitude, or if they preferred to keep the crew together for liferaft reasons, or just that it’s more likely you’ll smack into the tail due to slipstream even when using an emergency-escape chute. Any ideas?

    Ian’s finding that they exited through the floor on SOE ops seems more likely.

    in reply to: Airplane Plates #1416264
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I have a lovely six-plate set in a similar vein put out in the early 1990’s by Franklin Mint, featuring six Battle of Britain paintings by John Young. It includes Spitfires and Hurricanes. They are all packed away safely but I might have to get them out and display them now. 🙂

    in reply to: Tunes of Glory #1416271
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    On Saturday morning Angels One Five screened here on NZ’s Prime television channel. I didn’t even realise it was scheduled and happened across it half an hour into it, which peaved me off because I’d never seen it before and would like to have taped it completely – but I did record from that time onwards at least. Good film.

    Anyway, as it went to each ad break they played The Royal Air Force March Past, as heard on ‘Tunes of Glory’, so I assume that was also the main theme of the film at the beginning. So, was this written for the film or was it an existing RAF tune?

    I recall the RNZAF used to have it’s own tune that the band played on Wing Parades, etc., which sounded very similar but different and I believe it is called The Marchpast of the Royal New Zealand Air Force, but I’m not positive on that. So I assume ‘Angels One Five’s theme is probably an actual existing RAF marching tune, simply borrowed for the film?

    in reply to: 161 RAF Hudson ops #1417300
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Additionally, I do not think that people would want to jump using a static line from a Hudson’s door as it is awfully close to that big tail. So if they did jump it might have been through to bottom – ie the retractable gun position may have been modified so spies could jump through the floor. However I doubt either scenario is likely, and this link states that 161 Sqn’s Hudsons landed in open fields to drop off and pick up spies, or supply weapons to the resistance.

    http://www.uboat.net/allies/aircraft/hudson.htm

    in reply to: 161 RAF Hudson ops #1417310
    Dave Homewood
    Participant
    in reply to: DazDaMan #1417427
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Happy birthday Daz!!

    Many happy returns mate. 🙂

    in reply to: Interesting Defiant variant (and new model) #1419178
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Hedgehogs have fur in England? Our’s are prickly. 😀

    Wouldn’t this old-fangled quarter scale have been awfully confusing with 1/4 scale – which is a popular scale for r/c modellers? I’d never heard of that term before, so my apologies. But then NZ went Metric in 1967, and I wasn’t born till 1970. It wasn’t till I joined the RNZAF in 1989 that I learned all about the Imperial system because we were expected to work of very old aircraft that were built in the much inferior Imperial system.

    Yes, the standard of models has risen dramatically in the past ten years and people seem to think it’s a crime now to have to fill seam gaps when we’ve become used to the tight fits of Tamiya, AM and Hasegawa. The thing I find very interesting is most of the big opposing companies who produce all the best kits get their tooling done by one firm in Korea. I think it is down to their engineering that models went from Airfix style junk to 21st Century quality, but a few companies have taken a while to catch up, and some are not quite there yet.

    As far as the Hudson kit goes I plan to spend a very long time getting it right, and I don’t mind if it does take a lot of work. It is much better than having to scratch build it, which is what I was considering (in fact making the Contrail kit look right WOULD be scratchbuilding it!

    I love the Accurate Miniatures Avenger kit, it is fantastic. It’s really odd how they went bust, when they were so good. But it is good that they are back again and still producing. Another of the greatest manaufacturers, Trimaster, didn’t return.

    in reply to: Interesting Defiant variant (and new model) #1419997
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Sorry, I meant Classic Airframes but somehow typed AM. I agree that AM make lovely kits, possibly the second-best quality only after Tamiya. But some Classic Aiframes kits are ok.

    This Defiant is 1/48th, not quarter scale bu the way. And this new release is a complete retooling after a release last year that was slated for innacuracies. So at least they listen to their critics and fix the problems. I have not yet built a Classic Airframes kit but I have their Hudson and have had a good study of it. It’s not as crisp as Tamiya, but with a bit of work will make a lovely kit. I’m just a little scared to start it. I’ve waited 20 years for a decent Hudson kit, having previously had the appaulling Airfix 1/72nd (40,000 oversized rivets flying in formation) and the much worse Contrail vacform kit – which was obviously just vacuum formed over a dead fish as it is inches out for innacuracies. I junked it without even attempting to waste my time building it. The Classic Airframes kit is however ‘right’ as far as accuracy goes. I believe that the new Defiant is meant to be pretty good too. The link has some lovely photos at least.

    in reply to: Tunes of Glory #1420193
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Barnowl,

    You might be interested in this one. Much the same tunes as Tunes of Glory, and you can try before you buy.
    http://www.woolworths.co.uk/common/product.jhtml?pid=50053807

    in reply to: Tunes of Glory #1420384
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Barnowl,

    There are a few copies for sale on GEMM I see, plus many other records of the same name oddly. Go for the one with the Southern Band of the RAF listed as the artist. Though buying a 30-year old LP may mean it’s a little scratchy. Good luck.

    http://www.gemm.com/c/search.pl?currency=US&field=ARTIST+OR+TITLE&wild=tunes+of+glory

    in reply to: Tunes of Glory #1420426
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    That’s right Geoff, it does have Jet Provosts on the cover. I always used to think as a kid they’d have been better choosing Spitfires or Lancasters for the cover.

    Thanks Daz, I didn’t think ‘Spitfire Prelude’ was in the BofB film. That clears that up then. Was Walton’s ‘Battle in the Air’ the piece used in the big, big battle? I love that tune.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,601 through 3,615 (of 4,847 total)