dark light

Dave Homewood

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,396 through 4,410 (of 4,847 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfire TB863 over Wanaka #1608497
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Nicely done Mark. You’ve got a great record there of an experience I’m sure you’ll always treasure.

    John King is one of New Zealand’s leading aviation photographers and has had much published in calendars and books, as well as magazines.

    I hope that you had a wonderful experience in NZ and that someday you’ll return again.

    Dave

    in reply to: Stunning Aerial Combat Photos #1608579
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Originally posted by atc pal
    Also give a thought to the many, many aircrew lost in the darkness – hardly ever photographed.

    Best regards

    Yes, many became lost in the darkness, but the RAF had a brilliant scheme for when this happened. I interviewed Ron Watts, former Commander of the secretive 488 (NZ) Sqn who flew Mossie night fighters. If a plane became lost,the standard thing to do was fly one mile north, one mile east, one mile south, one mile west, and continue this box. The RAF radar operators would pick it up, and they’d vector in a Mossie from 488 or another nf unit. They would then guide them back. Apparently the bomber crews were always jubilant to see the Mossie arrive on their wing. You can imagine it.

    As for the other comments here, I agree with you all. I’m glad that everyone has seen these awful images as i see them. Very moving.

    As for few combat photos of RAF bombers, I don’t think flashlights were that good in those days. They were usually in pitch black, not even a moon if they could help it.

    in reply to: Correct way to abbreviate "squadron"? #1608580
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    As far as I’m aware the OFFICIAL abbreviation has always been Sqn. but if anyone can prove me wrong with evidence of a different official term I’d be happy to concede.

    However as we all know language evolves, and certainnthings have changed since the war. As pointed out here, abbreviations for ranks has changed. I have noted of late that the press always put a dash ‘-‘ between the words in Flight Lieutenant, Flight Sergeant, Squadron Leader and any other double-barreled rank.I haven’t yet looked into whether this was officially used too, within the RNZAF. But it is no longer used by either group today.

    Also, even in wartime, language was misused by people. Yes, things like Sqdn., Sqd., sqn and other variations crept in through laziness or simple ignorance of officialdom. Whatever the official one was at the time, the others are all non-standard and would have been frowned upin by a SWO.

    Frankly I would read Sqd. as referring to a squad, in Army terms rather than a squadron, each being a different sized formation.

    I’ve never heard of Recco before, sounds like an Australian version of Rick from Neighbours or Home and Away.

    As far as being part of a squadron, you can be both on a squadron and in a squadron. You are ‘on squadron’ if you are posted to a numbered squadron, such as No 40 Sqn. So you can then say “I’m on 40 Sqn” and people know you mean you work for the squadron.

    You can be ‘on’ a non-numbered squadron too, such as my example at Wigram where I was ‘on Tech Sqn’. It simply means that is the unit you belong to. You could rightly say also that you were ‘in’ a non-numbered squadron too, “I work in Admin Squadron.” That is also correct.

    And you can be ‘in’ a squadron when it is a formation and not an organisation. For example, on a Wing parade, the CO could say, “You lot are in Number 3 Sqn.” and you’d know exactly where to go and stand.

    Actually, in a 2nd Hand bookshop in Hamilton there are several old RNZAF and RAF manuals for sale. On is Service Regulations for the RAF in 1938. I may havea flick through next time I’m in town.

    Cheers
    Dave

    in reply to: B17 Nose Art in Memphis Belle #1609408
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Sounds great Steve.

    The video installation – is it still about Bomber Command? Imagine if you could do one actually inside a bomber in a museum, that’s be great.

    Have you seen both versions of All Quiet on the Western Front? The one with John-boy Walton and Ian Holm is a seriously good film, but the original is also god from vague memory.

    I never knew there were two Thin Red Line films. I have the recent, popular one. A bit strange. I wish that a proper film about the Pacific war could be made. Windtalkers was an utter joke, and Thin Red Line was good but too way out for most people to get.

    Most other Pacific war films involve musical numbers, or worse, Lee Marvin. Plus Hollywood makes it look like it was just the Japs vs the Yanks in the Pacific. Films never acknowledge that many other countries took part too. However there have been a few cracking Australian-made TV programmes that covered it very well. One was The Sullivans, another was a mini-series called The Heroes and a very recent one was called Changi.

    A couple of films on your list I’ve not heard of. I’m off to look them up.

    in reply to: Great British Technology #1609571
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Now this is special 🙂 🙂

    in reply to: Great British Technology #1609579
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    And one of these too.

    in reply to: Great British Technology #1609585
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I’d love to see one of these flying some day. One can dream.

    in reply to: Aircraft variants #1609617
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I believe in lower case, that’s how it usually seems to be written

    Dave

    in reply to: The 'What The Heck' File #1609657
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    This is an interesting one – I’d have guessed it wrong. It’s apparently a Brewster SB2A Bermuda Mk1, looks like a Helldiver to me

    Photo 18

    in reply to: The 'What The Heck' File #1609666
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    P-75

    Photo 17

    in reply to: The 'What The Heck' File #1609674
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Pity they didn’t have any of these in Dark Blue World

    Photo 16

    in reply to: The 'What The Heck' File #1609680
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    This is entitled Seattle, Washington, 10-19-1937

    Photo 15

    in reply to: The 'What The Heck' File #1609686
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Here’s a real WHAT THE HECK?

    Alright, I know one of them is a P47D 🙂

    Photo 14

    in reply to: Great British Technology #1609733
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    The Supermarine Sea Otter, luvly

    in reply to: Great British Technology #1609744
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Now Here’s a lovely beast. The MB-5. Isn’t there a flying replica being built somewhere?

Viewing 15 posts - 4,396 through 4,410 (of 4,847 total)