dark light

Dave Homewood

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,531 through 4,545 (of 4,847 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Duxford's weird jet fighter boat #1797026
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Ah, so the Beryl wasn’t named after the tea lady at Vickers then.

    I had never heard of a gemstone called a Beryl beofre. You learn something every day. Why would it have been inspirational as such?

    I did look it up, honest, couldn’t find much of interest. I did discover that the first jet engine to fly on a Lancaster was the Beryl in 1943, and yes Campbell’s Bluebird had been Beryl-engined but they were later changed.

    in reply to: Hendon's CR42 #1797073
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thank you Flood,

    that’s a great comprehensive site. I shall have to have a good read of it.

    Here’s a picture of the CR42 that I took at Hendon, Nov 93 (even then the lighting was poor, I’ve had to enhnace this shot to make it look better!

    Dave

    in reply to: Duxford's weird jet fighter boat #1797098
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Cheers guys, that tells me a lot more than I knew before. I had no idea the design went back as far as 1943-4, imagine if they’d gone into service, that would have been interesteing. Jets in the Pcific was rare enough, but a jet fighter flying boat!

    I also had to chuckle at the engine’s name. The likes of Rolls Royce found imspiring names for their engines like Merlin, Griffon and Dart. But Metropolitan-Vickers called their one Beryl !! :confused: 🙂

    in reply to: Brietling Team to reunite next year #1797129
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    The poor Spitfire seemed to be at near stall speed just to allow the Camel to keep up! I beleive that the Camel belongs to Peter Jackson by the way.

    There were one or two vertical shots from above which made the scene look very nive, two green planes against the lush green pasture, and the big old roundels on each.

    in reply to: World War Two Replicas #1797561
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Personally I think that the Halifax looks pretty damn spectacular in those photos posted by Papa Lima. It serves as a fabulous reminder for future generations of the thousands of men who flew in the type, and those crews did include Brits, Aussies, Canadians, French, New Zealanders, and no doubt men from many other nations. At least one Lancaster has been kept by museums and enthusiasts in each of the Empire countries as a reminder of their contributions to Bomber Command. Sadly the same consideration was not given to the other types such as Halifax, Stirling and Wellington, etc. Each type had their merits.

    I’ve never intended to knock the Lanc at all, it was a fantastic aircraft and the best heavy bomber in the war, I just feel that the other types also need to be remembered and celebrated too. Three or four generations from now, when the real veterans are long gone to that great big aerial battle in the sky, school kids may think the Lancaster was the only British bomber in the war. They’ll probably also think the CASA-built HE111 was the only German bomber too for that matter… I pity the future generations as they won’t have the benefit we’ve had to talk with real veterans and find out what it was really like.

    Although I don’t want to argue about this because I do see the point of what’s being said here, I wonder that if the one in the RAF Museum was rebuilt to as-new standard, would it require around the same amount of new build material to replace all the corroded and damaged parts? If restored properly I would think it’d definately come close. If so, would we still maintain it was a genuine Halifax, or would it too become a replica? Where do we make the distinction – the YAM one IS built round the remains of a genuine airframe, even if it’s not too substantial – much like the BBMF Hurricane and several ex-Russian crashed aircraft, etc., that have been rebuilt to fly – and they are still called genuine!

    I concede that the Halifax is not completely original, but from where I’m standing their achievements are fantastic, especially in the short amount of time it took to complete for such a big project.

    As one last thought… With what was acheived on the YAM project considering all the donated parts and work by the likes of BAe, did the RAF Museum realy miss the boat in not restoring their example? I’m certain they too would have had such generosity and support granted to such an undertaking rather than having to foot the bill themselves. Maybe not now though.

    in reply to: Flying Lancasters #1798370
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Cheers for sorting that one out for me James, sorry, my mistake.

    Dave

    in reply to: Wanaka news #1798891
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Cheers for the update Dave, I have been a little worried about the weather, it’s been crappy here.

    For anyone interested there is a One Network News report downloadable here about the airshow, from last night’s news.

    http://xtra.co.nz/broadband/0,,10979-3246972-300,00.html

    in reply to: Flying Lancasters #1798895
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Cheers Moggy,

    I didn’t realise Just Jane was actually already fully flyable and certified to do so. That’s great work by the team who own her, and great for if they ever decide to use her in that way. Maybe they can remake Dambusters now after all:)

    Do they do any high speed taxying where it gets close to take off? Or do they just trundle her about?

    I also didn’t realise that East Kirkby and Coningsby were so close to each other. That does sound like a great plan for a day out all right. next time I’m in the UK, I will have to defiantely do that.

    I can understand why that’s the last shop of its kind in the area, it’s so difficult these days to get coal-driven fish!;)

    in reply to: A few ex-RNZAF types – now history #1799089
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    And again

    in reply to: A few ex-RNZAF types – now history #1799111
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    And here is a shot of the Skyhawks of No 75 Squadron during a display at Whenuapai, doing the world-unique trick of formation aerobatics whilst coupled together with inflight refuelling hoses. These pilots were so good.

    in reply to: A few ex-RNZAF types – now history #1799117
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    The Boeing 727 – we had two of these in service and they were generally referred to in RNZAF circles as the Boing, or the Vomet Comet. Recently replaced with nice Boeing 757’s so I guess the nicknames can still apply.

    One of the Boeings is now at the training school at Woodbourne.I guess the other was scrapped?

    in reply to: A few ex-RNZAF types – now history #1799148
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    One of the more warry painted Andovers – while I was in the RNZAF they wore four different schems at the same time – green and brown (as seen above taking off); green and grey (seen here); all over white (UN colours, x2) and while, blue and grey VIP Andovers (x2)

    in reply to: A few ex-RNZAF types – now history #1799160
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Andover taking off from Whenuapai

    in reply to: A few ex-RNZAF types – now history #1799166
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Here is one of the ten Andovers used by the RNZAF. They were bought second-hand from the RAF in 1977 and played a vital role in the RNZAF in transport and logistics. They did a heck of a lot of work around NZ and the Pacific. They were also the trining aircraft for converting onto multis. It is the fact that these were not replaced properly that annoys me more than the loss of the combat wing. The Andovers were the workhorses of the RNZAF. They replaced them with four leased Beech King Air airliners – totally different type of operational aircraft and in my mind a waste of time as a replacement.

    in reply to: A few ex-RNZAF types – now history #1799198
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    A close up of the Wasp. I don’t know what became of the ex-RNZAF Wasps. They used to operate out of RNZAF Hobsonville from the same hangar as No 1 Technical Training School where I learned my trade, and I found them a fascinating little chopper. Tiny and cramped compared with their huge replacements.

Viewing 15 posts - 4,531 through 4,545 (of 4,847 total)