Thanks Paul, I have posted the photo here
http://rnzaf.proboards43.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=Wartime&thread=7517&page=1
That Ventura photo over Rabaul Harbour is quite well known and has appeared in a number of books. However I have never seen that one of the poor Corsair burning before, an amazing photo.
I hope the pilot escaped unharmed. Thanks for posting it. Do you mind if I copy the Corsair shot onto my NZ aviation forum please?
I have never seen that short-nosed version of the DH-86 before with the Rapide-style nose. Was that an earlier or later development? Quite neat looking.
One of the NZ Express’s failed to get airborne and went through a fence and the other two were wrecked taxiing into ditches, but I’ve never heard any problems with stability. Maybe our pilots and crews were never aware of the problems and recommended fix if the report was suppressed. I’ve talked to a few people who flew in them as crew in Fiji when we used two of them as reconnaissance bombers and they reckoned they were very lovely stable old aeroplanes.
It looks good T6flyer, but can you get it without those add-ons on the tail that spoil the look of the machine? They were not used on the NZ ones. I note they’re not on John’s photo of the last flying example either. Were they only used by QANTAS?
Don’t forget many of these companies would have been competing for defence contracts. Any advertising is good advertising.
Many other companies not related to the war effort continued to advertise even when their products were unavailable due to shortages. They used slogans that reminded people they might not be on the shelves right now but in better times they’ll be back. It’s all about keeping their brand in people’s minds. No doubt many companies went out of business during the war due to loss of staff or assets, and as Denis says, it would have been a fair bit about morale and giving confidence for their customers and their staff.
Thanks Geoff. I agree with John, the DH61 looks excellent.
I guess with moulds you could possibly make a few of them, for export to say NZ, the UK and other countries that used and love the DH86? I’d love to see one in a museum here.
Surely a huge company like Qantas must be able to throw a little money at their historic hangar to patch the leaks?
That is great news Geoff that you intend to build a replica DH86. Will it be a flyer?
Oh ha ha – don’t forget we’re downunder to you lot 🙂 (No, I must not perpetuate that silly myth, some of them still believe it…)
The Baffin and Vildebbest/Vincent never needed a crutch to swing the bombs past the prop as their hardpoint attachments were under the wings. The Baffins carried six 250lb bombs – three on each wing – as standard bombing set up. I think from memory the V-bombers may have been a similar set up.
Yes, my mistake, I took the brickdust for fire damage.
Four weeks ago? Why has it taken so long to make the press?
That photo has been blown up on my forum here,
http://rnzaf.proboards43.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=7195&page=1
and I found it interesting how well the unit markings and roundel survived the blaze as opposed to the black paint.
Imagine the look on the insurance man’s face when you told him you were claiming because your car was hit by a flaming Red Arrow.
I have both written and recorded oral history evidence that the Vildebeests, Vincents and Baffins were all dive bombed in RNZAF service, diving steeply from around 6000 to 8000 feet. This was demonstrated at airshows, and also before the war the RNZAF had a three-ship aerobatic team that appeared at public events to show off the Vildebeests, and they regularly looped in formation. These big biplanes were much tougher than they looked. Remember they had all metal structure under the fabric.
As for torpedo bombing in a Swordfish, here’s a demonstration of torpedo attacks at that time from the Jimmie Allen Manual of the Royal Air Force, which must rank as the first publication ever released to the public about the Battle of Britain I’d think.




When the Vildebeests, Vincents and the Baffins were withdrawn from the RAF (and in the latter’s case for some of them, FAA), before being sold to New Zealand in 1937-39, does anyone know what types they were replaced with in service?
ie which types superceded them in their squadrons? Does anyone know?
Some squadrons that our second hand Vildebeests had served with:
22 Squadron RAF
100 Squadron RAF
42 Squadron RAF
Some squadrons that our second hand Vincents had served with:
55 Squadron RAF in Iraq
84 Squadron RAF
100 Squdron RAF
Some squadrons that our second hand Baffins had served with:
810 Squadron
811 Squadron
812 Squadron at Hal Far
as well as various Middle East units (?) and HMS Furious and HMS Couragious
The FAA turned down Helldivers and the Dauntless, but used Avengers as bombers (shallow dive) more than Torpedo bombers.
The RNZAF also used Avengers as bombers rather than torpedo aircraft with No’s 30 and 31 Squadron, and I’m fairly sure they did some dive bombing as well as low level and glide bombing. They also fitted them with sprayers and sprayed fuel onto Japanese crops, soetimes ignititing the fields afterwards thoguht the fuel wrecked the food anyway.
Our Baffins, Vincents and Vildebeests were also used as dive bombers believe it or not (not in action, training only).
Hi Ant,
Thanks for that. I’m sure youy’re right, i was having a late night brain-fart and got the two mixed up. The Vilde was designed for torpedo work but most had the gear removed and some were built without it (like our RNZAF ones) whereas the Vincent had no torpedo gear and a different tail strut design but was otherwise a Vildebeest Mk III. Sorry for the confusion.
I don’t have Sky TV so have never seen dogfights.
Paul, were the Vincents used as torpedo bombers in those actions or as regular bombers? The only difference from a Vildebeest Mk III and a Vincent was the tail struts that hold the horizontal stabilizers on, and the Vincents were factory fitted with torpedo gear – but all the Vincents that came to NZ had no torpedo gar as the RNZAF didn’t want it, and some Vildes also served with the sqame gear, so they are basically the same aircraft with different tail strut mods.