dark light

MSR777

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,951 through 1,965 (of 3,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: British Airways Boeing 707 fleet, early 1980's #516724
    MSR777
    Participant

    I flew on a BA Boeing 707 in early 1982 LHR-LCA. I think its Regn was G-AXXY 🙂 Yup, checked my log book and it was ‘XY.

    in reply to: Alaska Airlines challenges Virgin’s right to fly in the US #519491
    MSR777
    Participant

    The comments against Alaska seem like a cheap shot to me, and have no bearing on the case.

    OK enough is enough. Firstly, Alaska IS an integral part of this thread and therefore does invite comments of any sensible type if members wish to add them. I was not aware that there an active censor in place, other than moderators, to ensure that comments viewed by others as having “no bearing” on the case are not permitted, perhaps in future you may like to prefix comments such as the above quote with the courtesy of IMO or longhand “in my opinion”

    What you regard as a “cheap shot” at Alaska was in fact originated by the National Geographic channel programme as detailed earlier. All the more ironic that I supplied additional information about it at your request! My comments that I would not fly on Alaska based on that information is MY choice to make. There may be cheap shots around here, but I’m not the one firing them.

    in reply to: Alaska Airlines challenges Virgin’s right to fly in the US #519516
    MSR777
    Participant

    You have!:D
    It doesn’t matter if Alaska Air is owned by satan mimself, past problems have no legal standing in the argument by Alaska vs Virgin.

    See posts 3 and 5 and I never claimed they did!!! My responses were to do with Alaska (which is part of the thread) itself and its past history, which like it or not is there. That has no connection with the Virgin issue and I never claimed that it it did. It was an observation on an airline mentioned in the thread. I wasn’t aware that we were in court ;).

    in reply to: Alaska Airlines challenges Virgin’s right to fly in the US #519530
    MSR777
    Participant

    I must have missed something here. I could not care less how long ago the Alaska MD80 incident happened, the fact is that it did and due to the wilful actions and dubious maintenance practices at the carrier at that time, many innocent people lost their lives to help save a ‘buck’. To my knowledge apart from the poor mechanic who blew the whistle on this awful saga, nobody senior lost their posts and for all you or I know some may still be there. I fail to see the connection with “nationalism” in this debate, my post was a response to a comment made ref Alaska by Jet22, with due respect to him. Is it not one of the great things about this forum that sometimes threads make relevant detours gathering in comments, information and theories along the way? Maybe after 1,374 posts I have misunderstood the premise all along. 😉

    in reply to: Alaska Airlines challenges Virgin’s right to fly in the US #520100
    MSR777
    Participant

    Thanks GA, that article refers to the same situation as covered in the excellent NatGeo documentary Air Crash Investigation dedicated to the crash that blew open this can of worms. Ship 741 if you have access to National Geographic channel this episode is repeated fairly frequently and is well worth seeing. I was left feeling that someone should have hanged for that, and I dare say that the families of those who lost their lives thought so too

    in reply to: Alaska Airlines challenges Virgin’s right to fly in the US #520295
    MSR777
    Participant

    I think alaska airlines (as good as it is) cant stand compeition on some of its routes that VX do, but isnt big enough to take on the big boys and has decided to do some under the belt scoring :diablo::dev2:

    Not that good me thinks! I seem to remember some pretty dodgy goings on with that carrier and its MDs a few years ago. I’d certainly never fly with Alaska after seeing that Air Crash Investigation programme about them, Frankly I am amazed that the FAA did not shut them down after that mess. :confused:

    in reply to: Aeroflot phasing out Soviet made aircraft #520539
    MSR777
    Participant

    For the vast Russian areas of the east airtravel is the only way. Ever been on roads of the North? When the USSR imploded a lot of outlying areas where left marooned. Not only in Russia, also in the other ex-SSRs.

    Absolutely right. Aeroflot existed purely as a means to an end as far as the Soviet Union was concerned. On the one hand, as you rightly say air travel was the only means of crossing vast areas of the country and those operations were a remit laid down by Moscow at that time. When you think that some Aeroflot “scheduled services” and ambulance/rescue duties were operated by many types of aircraft and helicopters some with floats and others with skis! often in appalling weather. You can just see BA doing that kind of thing can’t you. The domestic services mainly catered for Soviet citizens who also had a cheaper fares structure that operated alongside that charged for foreign passengers. The international services were mainly useful for maintaining links with the “satellite” countries along with “solidarity” flights to those states well disposed towards the USSR. They also delivered much needed foreign currency into the Soviet system for obvious uses. Aeroflots links with the Soviet Air Force is well known and as in the west, would become subordinate to its control and objectives, the same circumstances in fact that were applicable to my favourite airline Interflug. Its good that the winged Hammer and Sickle flies on….but for how much longer? 🙁

    in reply to: easyJet major reductions, incl. EMA hub closure #520703
    MSR777
    Participant

    Another example of what these “low cost carriers” do when confronted with having to pay the real market rates for the facilities that they use.

    Said it before…Don’t use ’em.

    in reply to: Aeroflot phasing out Soviet made aircraft #520708
    MSR777
    Participant

    I should imagine that would be a great experience…i believe Russian pilots tend to take a very steep approach when landing

    They certainly did Steve, at least on the Soviet types anyway.

    Schorsch, Aeroflot was most certainly the largest airline in the world by aircraft count. However as the entity was created to serve the needs of a command economy and to play its part in the objectives of the Soviet Govt, any other comparison with “Western” airline is meaningless. As its duties also included operating social obligation routes as well as a huge domestic and international network, not to mention the civil airports as well, I should imagine that there was many a “Wladimir” that was pleased that Aeroflot was there 🙂

    in reply to: Aeroflot phasing out Soviet made aircraft #520977
    MSR777
    Participant

    A great shame to see the sun setting on the Ilyushins and Tupolevs and the other Russian manufacturers. These were the machines that made the original Aeroflot (not the pale incarnation we see today) into the worlds biggest carrier and provider to the Soviet Union of its ability to span the globe with its air services as well as perfoming virtually all civil and quasi civil operations within the USSR. Its all very well Putin criticising the Russian aviation industry now, had he shown more leadership and promotion of the Russian aviation industry during his time as President then I think the outlook for the Russian companies may well have been very different today. I have flown many hours on those ‘beasts’ and have enjoyed every minute (and survived!) And if you have never experienced a climbout on a lightly loaded Tu134A, or landed at LHR in the nose navigators position on one then you have not lived 😀

    in reply to: B787 first flight delayed (again) #521861
    MSR777
    Participant

    A350XWB competes with B787-9.
    The B787-8 has no real Airbus competitor in the A350 line, and yes, the A330-200 is the direct counterpart.

    Schorsch

    Well I’m certainly wiser than when I got up this morning :rolleyes:

    in reply to: B787 first flight delayed (again) #521866
    MSR777
    Participant

    A330-200 is the closest competitor of B787-800.

    The closest competitor to the 787 will be the A350XWB 🙂

    in reply to: General Discussion #316328
    MSR777
    Participant

    I suppose you have to ask yourself why UK and US ‘foreign policy’ is so despised by some of the nations you have listed ? It’s not a war against terror it’s a war against people we’ve turned over at various points throughout history. The empires strike back… (apparently) :rolleyes:

    I was going to post on this Ren but having read yours I’ve nothing to add. Very well put sir.

    in reply to: Lockerbie bomber to be released on compassionate grounds #1899520
    MSR777
    Participant

    I suppose you have to ask yourself why UK and US ‘foreign policy’ is so despised by some of the nations you have listed ? It’s not a war against terror it’s a war against people we’ve turned over at various points throughout history. The empires strike back… (apparently) :rolleyes:

    I was going to post on this Ren but having read yours I’ve nothing to add. Very well put sir.

    in reply to: Heads Up – MAKS #522473
    MSR777
    Participant

    If you use Freeview television, a new Russian news channel has been added on channel 85. Their evening news service is currently featuring a MAKS slot at about 6.30pm.

    Very interesting new Russian aircraft and helicopters are featured, plus factory visits etc. The only downside is an English presenter. You’ll see what I mean if you tune in. On the other hand, some of the female presenters are very presentable…

    Bri 🙂

    Russia Today/RT…also available on Sky Channel 512. This channel often carries documentaries on different aspects of Russian/Soviet aviation. They recently screened a very good programme on the “Caspian Sea Monster” Ekranoplane, and others on the lives and works of both Ilyushin and Tupolev.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,951 through 1,965 (of 3,046 total)