dark light

|RLWP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 531 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Are These Aircraft Parts I Have Found? #963275
    |RLWP
    Participant

    My guess for the “clock” is a photosurvey intervalmeter, possibly a type B4. Used to trip the camera at set intervals for the mosaic pictures. Varies timing as set by speed and altitude of the recce a/c.

    I doubt it.

    http://i.imgur.com/sYd8bl.jpg

    Those two wheels on the front are the reduction mechanism to drive the hour hand. Pressed frame, teeth and an open spring mean a very cheap clock – If it had two springs I would have said it was a Smiths alarm clock

    Richard

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #967217
    |RLWP
    Participant

    Another film clip:

    http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4020/4682341685_5d0931b394.jpg

    Dick Grace – my hero

    Richard

    in reply to: Long shot mystery object #969074
    |RLWP
    Participant

    No need to apologise for thinking outside the box. I have already done this by taking the question from a canal forum to an historic aviation one

    Clearly, more information is needed

    Richard

    in reply to: Long shot mystery object #969656
    |RLWP
    Participant

    The flat wick idea is useful. I wonder if these are a heater of some kind? The small tube is a chimney, the large tube a reservoir

    Richard

    in reply to: Flared aircraft lightening holes #975155
    |RLWP
    Participant

    In actual fact, it reduces the propensity to form a crack from the thin cut edge. It reduces the chance of vibrations flexing the original thin flat plate at that point and thus causing fatigue cracks through the vibration. The flange, in effect, does stiffen it to reduce the flexibility.

    We are also being very loose with terminology. As the flange is perpendicular to the plane of the platework, it is effectively increasing the thickness of the component and stiffening it around two of the axes at the expense of the third. In fact, as we are into the ‘breadth times depth cubed’ bit of elasticity, you get a huge increase in stiffness around these for not much loss on the other.

    Richard

    in reply to: Flared aircraft lightening holes #975173
    |RLWP
    Participant

    How does the lightning know how to go through the holes?

    Oh, is that my coat?

    Richard

    :p

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #975176
    |RLWP
    Participant

    That reminds me of something

    http://www.amazingpaperairplanes.com/Dart_Basic2.jpg

    Richard

    in reply to: 5 Australian Spitfires stored at Point Cook? #988420
    |RLWP
    Participant

    Because it’s easier to let someone else do all the work?

    Moggy

    Good answer. Fancy a pint?

    Richard

    in reply to: 5 Australian Spitfires stored at Point Cook? #988427
    |RLWP
    Participant

    I’m not sure that there is an inconsistency here. Surely ‘phoning the airfield is the correct way – if they tell you to eff off and mind your own business, that is the answer you will get. Why ask a forum to do this for you?

    Richard

    in reply to: 2013 fresh start. #989907
    |RLWP
    Participant

    On the subject of dangerous drivel, one of my pet hates is “I don’t like what you are doing on this forum, you must all change”.

    Richard

    in reply to: James May Toy Story Sunday 23rd #994308
    |RLWP
    Participant

    {snip}

    someone had already marked out the runway

    {snip}

    Matt

    It looks like the runway on Lundy is permanent:

    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=lundy&hl=en&ll=51.171056,-4.669189&spn=0.005752,0.016512&sll=52.8382,-2.327815&sspn=11.359053,33.815918&t=h&hnear=Lundy&z=17

    Richard

    in reply to: A Christmas Puzzle #994543
    |RLWP
    Participant

    Never mind Spitfires – it would make a great carburettor cover on the bonnet of my MG

    Richard

    in reply to: What was the first model aircraft you built? #994846
    |RLWP
    Participant

    As far as I can remember, it was a near solid blob of polystyrene cement with some grey plastic in the middle. I must have loved it though as I am still doing it!

    http://i993.photobucket.com/albums/af54/RLWPowell/DR-I/Finished003.jpg

    http://www.primrose-engineering.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/handrail-knobs2.jpg

    Richard

    in reply to: James May Toy Story Sunday 23rd #994867
    |RLWP
    Participant

    and the 70s footage of A 10 year old May model flying and looking exactly a child version of the adult.

    In exactly the same garden as the 2012 James May? Skilful forgery methinks

    Richard

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread Mk2 #994868
    |RLWP
    Participant

    Great photos there – the last two – possibly a Tempest V doing the chasing and tipping? Not much detail left in the photos from those angles!

    That one is on Wikipedia – identified as a Spitfire!

    As we are still in defeating flying bomb territory, a Typhoon equipped with rockets for ground attack:

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/3_in_RP_60_pdr_Loading_On_Typhoon.jpg

    Richard

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 531 total)