dark light

AndyG

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 471 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dambuster's re-make ? Discuss #1379016
    AndyG
    Participant

    Someone posted a Mosquito clip recently, can’t remember if it was here, which I watched and thought, I don’t ever remember seeing a cinema film of mozzies in formation with MKIX’s before? Then cut to a single mozzie landing.

    It was CGI!! by some Japanese Wizard…..very very very good, frighteningly good in fact. On landing tail wheel twitched, mains skipped, surfaces reacted shuddered and looked all very realistic.. apart from the grass that was….
    His efforts are only a year or so away from being pretty well indistiguishable from the reel thing for the masses at least.

    Makes you wonder what our beloved Governments will be able to get away with telling us really happened in future…………….

    in reply to: HHA Buccaneer #1379031
    AndyG
    Participant

    Clucking Bell!

    That was a surprise and a half!

    Fantastic, love the Bucc. Well done!

    in reply to: Ray Hanna #1388820
    AndyG
    Participant

    I remember Ray Hanna displaying in a Corsair duet with another NZ pilot in the late 90’s at Duxford, which at the time stopped me in my tracks with its fluidity and aerial ballet qualities, beautiful. Something to remember for ever and a day. Not sure that everyone in the crowd fully appreciated what they had just seen at the time.

    His son Mark once allowed me (trusted me as a stranger) to walk out on my own to his Spitfire on the apron (whilst he continued his discussions and coffee in our flying club, Spitfire out of sight too), press the button on the canopy, climb aboard and indulge in half an hours dream time in the cockpit of MH434. 🙂 I think his father may have shined through too in his character, though guessing.

    How many 77 year olds out there were still flying their high performance aeroplanes until near end of their time? Thank you Mr Hanna.

    Very sad indeed, though time to dig out the MH434 video and watch Mr Hanna Snr take off, from inside the cockpit, hood open, check gauges and off he goes…..

    There was a beautiful piece of classical music which accompanied that sequence on their video, any ideas to the piece? Perhaps it was his choice?

    in reply to: The Dam Busters Movie photos #1402730
    AndyG
    Participant

    Do those tail wheels look a little high, or is it just my imagination?

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 Offical Update #1409417
    AndyG
    Participant

    I loved the Vulcan when it was in the air, and was very sad to see it go, but I believe that it’s had it’s time, and that not everything can be kept going forever; as stated, the Vulcan as a type had 10 years or whatever of airshow life beyond it’s operational days, and for a type that barely saw any real operational use in the role for which it was intended, that was pretty good going, and a real testament to what a fabulous aircraft type it is/was. The thing is, lots of other great types of aircraft have gone and stayed gone, and the Vulcan- with it’s MAMMOTH costs- should be no different. We’ve HAD the sights and the sounds, and those of that that saw the same should just count ourselves lucky.

    For God’s sake, just let the thing retire with some dignity.

    I loved the Lancaster when it was in the air, and was very sad to see it go, but I believe that it’s had it’s time, and that not everything can be kept going forever; as stated, the Lancaster as a type had 60 years or whatever of airshow life beyond it’s operational days, and for a type that saw operational use in the role for which it was intended, that was pretty good going, and a real testament to what a fabulous aircraft type it is/was. The thing is, lots of other great types of aircraft have gone and stayed gone, and the Lancaster – with it’s MAMMOTH costs- should be no different. We’ve HAD the sights and the sounds, and those of that that saw the same should just count ourselves lucky.

    For God’s sake, just let the thing retire with some dignity.

    What exactly is undignified about flying again? Should the Lancaster, Spitfire, Mustang etc etc retire now with some dignity? Sounds very New Labour to me?

    I think you’ll fine that its those out there who still have a bit of good old British get up and go about their person, whom you will have to indoctrinate with your negative sentiments Lancman!

    :diablo:

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 Offical Update #1411632
    AndyG
    Participant

    Does anyone else find this constant begging for cash, especially from those who have supported the project most a little bit disturbing?
    kev35

    No, I am not disturbed at all……….. I applaud them.

    Do you want to see a Vulcan, a significant British aeronautical engineering achievement by any measure, in the Sky again?

    Give them a break please? Why the constant public negativity on this forum?

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 Offical Update #1411851
    AndyG
    Participant

    No matter what you think about the Duxford proposal, A bird in the Air is worth two in the bush, especially in this case.

    🙂

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 Offical Update #1414175
    AndyG
    Participant

    I don’t think it’s a matter of being ‘negative’ as such . The whole campaign to get the Vulcan flying again has been handled in a most unusual way. To press release that the aircraft would be scrapped if the money wasn’t raised at one stage and then to announce that it would go to Duxford at the end of it’s flying career has raised more than a few eyebrows.
    My interest is in preservation – the prospect of Duxford’s Vulcan being replaced
    by a non representative civilianised Vulcan at the end of her flying career isn’t what preservation is about.

    How they get there and the words they use are unimportant to me and I suggest the majority of those of us who would like to see a reprise of what we used to be able to create, flying again.

    Preservation: XH558 is hardly that far removed from the mighty Vulcan as we know her as far as ‘man’ on the street is concerned. I am sure there will be a satisfactory solution to the Duxford ‘rumour’ in due course.

    And also, eyebrows amongst the uninvolved can continue to be raised ad finitum…….. as long as the dedicated team achieve their objective, to which we should all look forward to and applaud.

    As long as the crew wear period flying costume of course……. 😉

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 Offical Update #1414200
    AndyG
    Participant

    I wonder how ‘negative’ some of the forum posters would be if this was one of Mr Chadwicks company’s earlier designs such as the Lancaster, whose future was being discussed?

    in reply to: Help identifying recovered relic sought #1418259
    AndyG
    Participant

    Have you got rear/side views?

    in reply to: Merlin sounds #1425983
    AndyG
    Participant

    Anyone know how to get a Merlin/Griffon ringtone set up?

    in reply to: Mildenhall – WB57 #1341064
    AndyG
    Participant

    For those interested there are some very nice photos here:

    http://ccgi.robleigh.force9.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=56

    in reply to: anyone i/d airfield / a/c #1342996
    AndyG
    Participant

    I think you’re right about them being Wellington’s, i would say initially that they are T.10’s though, as the nose turrets look faired over,so it may be later than the 1941/42 suggestion.
    Not much idea on the location as not much in the background,Finningley ?

    Early Wellingtons had no conventional nose turret as we would know them, so may be earlier.

    Pegasus spinners.

    I’d say they are early Wellingtons, not T10’s.

    in reply to: Spitfire undercarriage #1343040
    AndyG
    Participant

    No doubt in my mind that Corgi needs (would like them to) to modify the stance of the undercarriage legs.

    Picture I got off the net doesn’t quite explain it, must get a cam out.

    Not a critism at all as for what they are and what they cost they are very accurate.

    Now if only they would do a 75 (NZ) squadron Wellington…….

    in reply to: Spitfire undercarriage #1343371
    AndyG
    Participant

    Back on to the Corgi undercarriage theme.. ahemmm!

    Took ages to find a picture!

    Most of the 1:72 scale Spits look like this…..Looks a bit straight for me?

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 471 total)