dark light

andrewm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 3,663 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Concord G-BOAD arrives in Brooklyn #518808
    andrewm
    Participant

    I was onboard in December 2005 and was shocked at the state of her. They appear to have made no effort at all to keep her in good shape.

    Inside they have made two walls of clear perspex along the end of the isles which does not do the interior of the aircraft and good looks wise. Agreed the floors etc is tatty and cockpit is awful looking.

    in reply to: Happy New Year To All (Trident G-AWZK Update) #583370
    andrewm
    Participant

    Very cool shots, if only the Trident at BFS was in as fine a state!

    😮 😮 we have a trident??:eek: 😮

    in reply to: Low Flying Boeing 707 image. #583378
    andrewm
    Participant

    I don’t know how many times i crossed the Pacific from Sydney to LAX in the sixties and early seventies on Pan Am 707’s…they were a very comfortable ride along with the Air New Zealand DC8’s

    I am not that keen on more “historic” aircraft (mainly DC3 etc) but the 707 is definetly one i would give anything to have a flight on. Ive heard many stories from pax and never once has there been a bad one!

    in reply to: Stunning F100 reflection Shot On A.Net #583382
    andrewm
    Participant

    Got a thing for reflections Mr PMN?

    Its his own he needs to worry about 😮 😮 :dev2: :p :diablo:

    I think that guy is ATC at NCL, i remember reading his website circa 2001-2002. He is very good at getting stuff like that having seen other stuff i can remember on his site (cant find link but will post if i find)

    in reply to: BA Aircraft Maintenance #583586
    andrewm
    Participant

    There was a indepth look at BAMC and their Croesyceiliog (or Cwmbran) Aircraft Seat Refurb/Assembly facilities i think in late 2005 Airliner Word? Unsure if anyone still has any copies from that era?

    in reply to: Aircraft Overnight Parking Question #583589
    andrewm
    Participant

    I thought it might be but it has been done in cases of good weather over the last month or so! Also, they are always parked in the same position when the wind around that area can normally get a 130 heading which would mean wind was going from nose to tail whilst parked nose in on stand!

    in reply to: Airlines and aircraft you have been on #584250
    andrewm
    Participant

    Airbus A300 Lufthansa
    Airbus A319 British Airways, United Airlines, US Airways
    Airbus A320 bmi British Midland, MyTravelLite, Aer Lingus
    Airbus A321 Eurocypria, MyTravel, bmi British Midland
    Airbus A330 Lufthansa
    Boeing B732 Ryanair
    Boeing B733 easyJet, Jet2
    Boeing B737 easyJet
    Boeing B738 Ryanair
    Boeing B747 British Airways
    Boeing B777 United Airlines, British Airways
    Bae146 Flybe, Eurowings
    Dash 8 Q400 Flybe
    Fokker F27 Jersey European
    ERJ135 American Airlines
    CRJ200 Air Canada
    CRJ700 United Airlines

    And within the next 3.5 months to include:

    Airbus A330 bmi British Midland
    Airbus A346 Virgin Atlantic
    Boeing B757 British Airways

    andrewm
    Participant

    I think, if it goes ahead, someone needs to challenge this (in court if necessary) – I don’t necessarily mean you or I, but maybe the consumer association, or another trade body.

    Agreed

    As far as I can see, if I’ve paid for a flight and the charges include security taxes and charges and there are no conditions that state that I will be subject to security charges applied by the airport.

    As the charge is technically not leved by airlines or really has much legally to do with them it would not have to feature in the T&C. It would be viewed as a contract, of sorts, between you and the airport.

    in reply to: More information on BA's long haul replacement plan. #584393
    andrewm
    Participant

    True, but frequency of service counts as much as capacity on routes like these.

    True for most part but im sure the 55 minute gap between some lhr-jfk services would be more economical to BA if they consolidated onto one flight on a larger aircraft, if that was possible.

    Remember A380 is not the equivalent of two B747s or two B777s so if the majority of flights are full combining two flights is not possible without losing capacity that normall is used.

    andrewm
    Participant

    I think the likes of Ryanair are responsible for the end result of charging pax.

    At Londonderry Airport (EGAE) they were given over £1million to promote the London Stansted service by the local council. This was in addition to fees for landing and per pax that are hardly worth mentioning due to the haggling of FR.

    FR (and the rest) seem to be able to too easily make airports believe they need the airline and not the other way around.

    The airlines are not state run, they are private companies making lots of money yet they resent any additional charges that are needed for things such as security. (things that keem them flying)

    Their marketing is superb, general punters seem to think its the airport and governments fault yet really one could agrue the airline could be a little more “co-operative” when it comes to at least part obsorbing the costs.

    in reply to: MAN-LHR-BRU on BA (And Lots of Hassle!) #409671
    andrewm
    Participant

    Is five FA’s for an A319 not overkill? I thought the mimum/average was 3 or 4

    in reply to: For our younger members #585209
    andrewm
    Participant

    Already been posted sorry!

    in reply to: AS365 down in Irish sea #585233
    andrewm
    Participant

    G-BLUN

    in reply to: General Discussion #333921
    andrewm
    Participant

    bump :diablo: :dev2:

    andrewm
    Participant

    bump :diablo: :dev2:

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 3,663 total)