dark light

halloweene

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 4,136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2101099
    halloweene
    Participant

    Neither do France, we have official quotes (2 posts above, from your very link). bogus calculation my ass. Rafale is way cheaper to operate, end of the story.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2101142
    halloweene
    Participant

    It is fully sourced (CFPH in Lybia). https://vanguardcanada.com/2013/09/11/mission-satisfaction-rafale-offers-proven-capability/

    14000 euros sry, not dollars. Still…more or less half of F-35 (not to mention during that war Rafale M flew up to 35 hours/week….

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2101186
    halloweene
    Participant

    From your very source :

    The most recent figures, from 2013-2014, put the acquisition cost per Rafale at €74 million (Rs 566 crore/Rs 5.66 billion) for the Rafale B (twin-seat version); €68.8 million (Rs 527 crore/Rs 5.27 billion) for the Rafale C (single-seat version); and €79 million (Rs 605 crore/Rs 6.05 billion) for the Rafale M (aircraft carrier version).

    69 million euros for Rafale C. (77 million $)

    More expensive for exports, yes. Why?
    Licences etc costs. (export costs generally speaking)
    Industrials payed for 25% of the development program cost. Upon to themselves to charge these 25% on export orders.

    Basically, NO. Rafale is cheaper than F-35

    Not to mention CFPH during Libya operations : 13000 $…

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2101209
    halloweene
    Participant

    Except that internal prices for countries like France do not contain the subsidy amounts. This was made evident when India reported on the cost breakdown of the Rafale where the plane itself was $110 mil, before a mysterious $50 mil “India customization” markup and did not include any support, parts or weapons.

    There is nothing such a s any subsidy in Rafale program. Indian exact cost repartition is not known. Just suppositions. Nothing solid. Exactly like your excel sheet graph, i can see different numbers about cpfh in every report from GAO etc.25000$ or less (depending on how it is computed) do not mean a lot as hard values. Everyone is complaining about elevated costs indluding DoD.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2101226
    halloweene
    Participant

    Really, the facts are today the price of the F-35 is lower than most 4.5 Generation Fighters. This while being “VASTLY” more capable. That is just the “COLD HARD TRUTH”. If, you care to believe it or not….

    The “Critics” like yourself have been wrong since day one. So, your prejudice and bias is hardly surprising. :rolleyes:

    Except that NO it is not cheaper, this is plain and simple convoluted fantasm from export chewed and twisted numbers. Off the shelf prices for building countries are documented. Finally, “vastly” is well… An opinion, nothing more. Not to talk about astronomic CFPH…

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2101230
    halloweene
    Participant

    Dassault did play well on the “make in india” part. Front parts of Falcon are produced from Nagpur, and a much bigger building is being built.
    How to build confidence in a partner…

    in reply to: Rockets Red Glare #2101351
    halloweene
    Participant

    Do anyone know the lauch envelope of an AMRAAM by F-35 (altitude, speed, AoA, Gs etc.)?

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2101356
    halloweene
    Participant

    Edited image is deleted due to sensitivity of data.

    in reply to: Franco-German next generation fighter #2101371
    halloweene
    Participant

    That’s what they tried to iron out in Aix la Chapelle treaty.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2101379
    halloweene
    Participant

    No one said Flynn isn’t qualified or not credible. But since he works for LM he would tend to only present the positive aspects of the F-35. Just because he’s qualified and knowledgeable doesn’t mean he’s unbiased. Are you not intelligent enough to know the fallacy of appealing to authority?

    For once i will disagree. As Scooter is citing Flynn, giving Flynn records isn’t wrong imho.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2101382
    halloweene
    Participant

    Given that ONE former head etc. Isn’t related at all. LM is simply molesting Germany.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2101398
    halloweene
    Participant

    US heavily pressuring Germany…

    https://www.ft.com/content/4b56e040-6993-11e9-80c7-60ee53e6681d

    Germany’s F-35 fighter rebuff raises questions for Nato partners
    Lockheed Martin’s Europe chief warns ‘retrograde step’ imperils defence co-operation
    “Germany’s decision not to buy the F-35 stealth fighter jet is a “retrograde step” that could hamper the country’s ability to operate at the same level as its Nato partners, according to the European head of Lockheed Martin, which manufactures the aircraft.
    Jonathan Hoyle, vice-president for Europe at the US defence group, said the German decision in January to exclude the F-35 from further consideration to replace its ageing Tornado fleet had caught a lot of governments “on the hop”. The German defence ministry said at the time it had decided to acquire either more Eurofighters from Airbus, the European group, or Boeing-made F-18s.
    …(…)…
    Europe remains a key growth area for Lockheed, added Mr Hoyle, notably Poland, which will become a regional hub for the group. Poland has pledged to spend 2 per cent of its strongly growing gross domestic product each year on defence as part of a 10-year modernisation plan outlined in 2013.”

    in reply to: Franco-German next generation fighter #2101464
    halloweene
    Participant

    No. They are ok with present thrust. you know how it works. Cited thrust is made at sea level, 25°C etc. Not always representative of engine behaviour in many different conditions. It seems that the Aux was modernized (rubis3) for high altitude, otherwise i’m not aware of any change made to the engine (apart from FADEC)

    in reply to: Franco-German next generation fighter #2101500
    halloweene
    Participant

    No.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2101503
    halloweene
    Participant

    Tarets are also fleetwide no?

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 4,136 total)