wow for a ingle second i thought you were taliking about novostny… Lets stop that stupid argument?
Most of what you’re saying makes sense to me, but I can’t help but think that the G. W. Bush Administration (among other key players) behaved in a questionable manner before (and during) the 2003 invasion. AFAIK, there was some “informed” opposition / warnings from former US national security advisers and military officers, academics etc., not to mention some Allied intelligence services, raising concerns about the reliability of some of the intelligence (i.e. “Curveball”), the uncertainty surrounding potential consequences of a large-scale invasion and occupation and so on. I think it’s fair to ask how reliable the Administration’s decision-making cycle really was given the information they had access to at the time.
Include USSR administration during invasion of Afghanistan?
The quoted accuracy of JDAMs is 13m CEP, meaning 50% land within 13m. Achieved accuracy is slightly better. But yes, a miss by 50ft is still possible under worst case. But nobody really knows the original target in this footage anyway. A GPS/GLONASS bomb goes to where it was told to go prior to release, what the pod is pointing at when it lands is irrelevant, there is no correction post release.
I suppose it also depends on the quality of the inertial guidance system no?
Hello all 🙂
I present my video Flight Deck Ops2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mehij8v5HI
Youtube If you say “no available video ” click this link :
hope it will please you
Have a great weekend 🙂
Friendly
Ange(L)
Already posted it on Rafale thread with youtube link. TYVM! (le croisement!!!!)
For the Autor obviously as he has putting as a title something that was cristal clear from the same inception of program.
For Halloweene I don’t know about it but for All Saints day we usually go back to our place of origin, pray for ours old ones and made a great family lunch, if you are somewhere near there you can join, lot of chesnuts and red wine.
TY for invite 😉
USMC F35Bs will regularly fly of the decks of the UK carriers:
http://aviationweek.com/defense/us-marines-could-play-major-role-uk-carrier-operations
Plus loads more in the article (although we are all waiting for SDSR for the meat ).
Ok decide what you want for SDSR, but PLEASE let us french cook the meat!
thank you, but link on the conference would be nice 🙂
Edit : got it
Having the ability to stay in control in a post-stall manuver vs being able to respond quickly without fighting the control logic that is trying to stabilize the aircraft are different. Yeah the aircraft can do it. But as report says pitch and yaw are being dampened by CLAW to the point that it is tactically useless. The control laws can be fixed, Just not sure that it is highest on the software priorities right now.
Rafale, before FCS limits, went upto 110° AOA About post stall recovery, noone know, including you.
Sad we can’t sell ASMP/A due to its unique scramjet ignition system 🙁
The vertical transition is impressive (I didn’t put the sound on but I anticipate the pilot reaction). Yoyo up. Ok. Good. Roll is good also until it reaches the limiter at 150kt (release stick). What is a taut too high (270kph). *
But what is the point. If you’d show us a 2K doing so, it will be remarkable, but seriously, an F16 caught in the vertical while the Raf is beaming on it at 300kt?!
I don’t see the point. But the Beer sounds good.
*it shows that they still haven’t work that with bigger canard and slightly longer/wider fuselage (for ex).
Remember a M2K killed a F-22 in BFM during ATLC?
You are making e bad looking fanboy 😉
First off, have you ever read a flight test report?
Next, where does it say that “we tested the thing against an f-16, to see how it could do”. It doesn’t…and there is a very good reason for testing control law logic and departure resistance in BFM. The pilot will be rapidly moving control surfaces and abruptly applying power while oriented on different axis. The canned set ups at relatively low speed were perfect to test High alpha, pitch rate, yaw.
They learned that (largely due to the TRO experienced in early testing with the F-35C) the control logic was too restrictive, and there is a margin of maneuverability that can be added back in (with relaxed stability designs, the fcs can be programmed, too much stability dampens agility and control response).
The F-35 is not going to compete in the turn and burn compared to lightweight fighters, but overall agility should be pretty good when flight testing is done.
enough?
DDM NG is a drop-in replacement. They would need new software to get any new functionality for it and the plane body blocks its view of anything below the aircraft.
Hint : there is presently a Dassault pilot called “Marco”, nickname”Claudia” testing new systems at Bold Quest. Take a beer with him, he is a very nice guy.
No. And I don’t expect any to come..
nope but Syria has some
Let’s start from a sensible position : What if IAF planners were excellent? enough bashing please.
Can talios auto geolocate missile launches, and launch platforms?
Can it send the data to every Rafael in theatre? Can it do this in the rear sector?
Can talios track vehicles and artillery?
Can it do all of these at once while the squall drops 8 sdbs?If not then its sensor fusion is 2nd rate.
yes not int the rear secror, ddm ng takes the game.
All sensor are fused via MDPU
Did you read the specs and look at the pictures? Talios is Oodas like, not eots