Fix for F-35 fighter engine near done, Pratt to pay
US pilots were restricted to attacking enemy aircraft that were in visual range in order to make a positive ID. What that has to do with the real performance of AIM-7 is not clear. Also, BVR missiles of the sixties were, I believe, primarily designed to shoot down bombers – not MiGs.
Wondering why pilots preferred (ahead of engineers) a new TV channel to a new IR on Rafale’s OSF?
The problem with an all out noise biltz is that the frequency pattern added to the noise will still act as a finger print if we’re talking about a white noise type approach. If however, you adopt the approach of simply creating an AESA-like barrage and pseudo-randomly bombard frequency patterns across the X-Band spectrum, that might mess around with the response enough to influence range and velocity computation at the other end if you get lucky. The downfall is that a partial fingerprint will still remain, i.e. a set of frequencies at a given spread with coding across that part intact. A well programmed AESA will be a monster to confront with traditional jamming. RF cyber warfare approaches may have some merit though. If you can’t fool the system, corrupt the system or hijack it.
Point is do you need to permanently jam the radar or simply disrupt the kill chain?
Did i say the opposite? RWR have the advantage of stronger signals, Rx to “know” what to search already…
I do not understand what you are trying to say.
DAmn was doing my best in english 🙁
What i’m traying to say is that radar pulses aren’t simply “pings”, but short signal with specific polarization etc. These “patterns” are used by radar receiver to identify its own signals way under background noise threashold using correlators. The same way our GPS identifies a 25W signal coming from 20000 Kms. But the number of these “patterns” is limited.
Hope i was clear and didn’t say BS translating 😉
Sadly you have waxed yourself into a corner that you are going to have to rewrite to get out of.
The ONLY Air Force aircraft that were on alert status were Air Defense Command fighters, that does not exist.
At this time Air National Guard bases are the only ones performing that function.
The last Contiguous Air Force base flying F-15s in a mode that could have filled in was Mountain Home in Idaho and they disbanded several years ago.
There are ZERO Air Force compounds that have quick alert aircraft beyond the Air National Guard flying F-16s.The time for get a B-1 ready, that is not on alert status would be hours, not minutes and there are NO B-1s on alert status at Edawards.
About the only thing that, maybe and that is a big maybe, would be if ATAC had aircraft at Edwards for Red Flag type exercises and then you would have a civilian pilot as Air Force pilots are not familiar with the aircraft ATAC flys and even then you have the problem of multiple air to air refuelings plus ATAC would have to be flying their two-seat Viggen which they have now retired.
You are going to have rewrite in some form or push plausibility to fantasy levels.
One possibility would be that a European Air Force still flying F-4s was at Edwards for war games, or another base near by, and an exercise was about to start so the aircraft were already running ready to launch.
Why F4??? Gripen, Typhoon trainer or Rafale B or insian sukhoi 30 MkI (afterall they participated to Red Flag) would fit perfectly. F4 aren’t in service anymore in Germany and i dont know if any ally participating to Red Flag still use it. Of course geopolitics consideration of you book should be taken into account.
No need for crystal balls or James Bond. In practice, the frequency hopper does not have a huge range of frequencies over which to operate. It remains within a predictable percentage of its centre frequency. As I understand it, the solution is to be able to search that band of frequencies at very high speed in order to locate the signal after each hop, and then start jamming it. (I am sure that I have posted this information some months ago.)
:applause:
That applies also to waveforms.
Pratt halted F-35 engine shipments in May over titanium
To be taken with a pinch of salt, as usual…
India-Russia jet deal hits turbulence over ‘technical worries’
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2738681/India-Russia-jet-deal-hits-turbulence-technical-worries.html#ixzz3BxOqZXvB
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Has Ukraine asked for any foreign help with this invasion?
Yes
P&W found a fix for F-135. Fix your own conclusions…
http://mobile.defensenews.com/article/308280040
NVM in that very case it seems that F-16 weren’t involved.
Seems they used their Mirage 2000-9…
http://www.lopinion.fr/blog/secret-defense/frappes-emirats-en-libye-ont-ete-effectuees-mirage-2000-9-15748
The F-35s would attack quickly in supercruise and would mount 3+ sorties the first day. 100 F-35s would launch 1200 missiles in one day, enough to destroy most aircraft shelters, enemy planes on the tarmacs etc, and the VHF radars
You are kidding aren’t you?
A-400 M REfuels F-18
[ATTACH=CONFIG]231320[/ATTACH]