Indeed. But that is the RUPEE price, not the DOLLAR price.
If I put in company accounts done like that, I’d be prosecuted for false accounting. It’s an inaccurate and dishonest way or representing the cost increase.
Negative. the original RFP cost was about off the shelf + spare parts, training, life cycle costs etc. Noone can predict the cost of ToT as it would imply you know the exact amount of investment each subcontractor will have to do.
U.S. grounds entire F-35 fleet pending engine inspections
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/07/04/us-lockheed-fighter-idUSKBN0F901T20140704
Let’s say a Rafale consortium exec. And no no basis btw it would be stupid as indian input will ramp up on every indian produced Rafale (that is waht i was told).
The M53 was probably not the best engine to pit against rivalries offered for F-15. In hindsight I’m not so sure Mirage 4k offered any promises that EAP did not already make, plus it had a larger projected customer base. EJ200 was not ready by that time, but it was a technology leap over the M53. France chose to downscale when they designed the Rafale to make it affordable. Would the 4k be affordable in production is the bigger question.
If you say so (about F-15). I have comparison charts but you’ll have to wait sorry. Let alone say it could climb faster was more manoeuvrant at high speed, fly higher and had more range…
About EAP, nothing common, different weight classes. And Mirage 4000 was a prototype, not a Tech demonstrator. some years before EAP.
Rafale has never been a successor of EAP but of ACX.
The Sun is also highly read in England…
Btw talked to an industrial tonight. Answer was clear : pure BS.
3330 Kms on innner fuel (3h30) clean config. Not range, max distance.
My bad, was thinking about polish Mig-29 and kidding Sintra
I still cańt find info saying it can do passive ranging ( wasńt it quite the same as DAS ? )
ONly if the target is quite close. (with measurable angular movement). So yes quite similar to EODAS (although less sensors, but with very diff tech afaik)
Only thing disclosed is using DDM-NG and RWR (datafusion) Rafale B301 was able to simulate a passive MICA shot way more than 10 NM (intently unprecise) in rear hemisphere (a M2K chasing it).
Triangulation will come with resilts of PEA Tragedac program, i think also with Gripen NG and of course F-35
In the meanwhile,
Mitsubishi Electric eyes F-35 missile deal with Europe’s MBDA: Sources
precisely 11430L 😉
That said i recetly finished the book “la guerre vue du ciel” by Cdt “claudia” Schaeffler, a 2000D pilot, and he didn’t complain about cockpit comfort, aswell as he talked about very long missions.
I agree 4000 was an entirely different league. But i didn’t hear the same things about Saudi rebuttal…
BTW, mirage 4000 cockpit prototype…
[ATTACH=CONFIG]229777[/ATTACH]
not bad for early 80ies no?
And what irst system actually doing that now ? Zig zag supersonic ?
DDM-NG for the first part, will have to wait 2018 for the second part.
Not to mention inadequate cockpit environment which affects pilot endurance.
Develop please?
crap photo but original one will be in the booklet…
[ATTACH=CONFIG]229736[/ATTACH]
1 conformal 1700L fuel tank + 2* 2500L external fuel tanks + 2+AAS30+ 2missiles + 9* 250 kgs (or is it 125.? )bombs
The horror… The horror… 🙂
This topic is strangely quiet…
Nice video by the way.
I can fix that with some declarations after Garuda V if you wish 😉
Not at all, I just find it amusing how foolish this makes some of the fanboy crowd around here look. In fact it was only last year that we had people saying hilarious stuff like the following:
:very_drunk:
So here we are just about 13 months later and surprise surprise… someone is discovering that the F-35 they dedicated some many hours to railing against is by their own calculation, just about on target for price. (and without accounting for the fact that the F-35 is a generation/couple decades newer)
Anyone taking DNA news seriously???? It’s a web tabloid.