dark light

halloweene

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,836 through 2,850 (of 4,136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Enclosed Weapons Pod- F/A-18 #2248676
    halloweene
    Participant

    Rafale proved to be better/much better than enhanced Swiss F/A-18C/D in several mission including Air Policing, OCA, DCA during technical evaluation.
    Swiss enhanced F/A-18C/D OFP-19C present similar capabilities to new F-16C/D blk 52+, as it has got AMRAAM, link-16, JHMCS and AIM-9X.
    Rafale has got smaller RCS, sensor data fusion, SPECTRA EW system with DDM-NG, FSO, better performance, thus make it overall better than enhanced A/C model in many aspects.

    Don’t try to convince some believeers these are unique revolutinnary 5th gen features…. (fully network, datafusion, high computing power, hobs missiles usage etc.)

    in reply to: GENERAL UAV/UCAV NEWS AND DISCUSSION THREAD II #2248737
    halloweene
    Participant

    Interesting piece from Sweetman about Taranis.

    Broadband Stealth May Drive Taranis Design

    http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/AW_02_17_2014_p33-662743.xml

    in reply to: What metrics of Agility and Maneuverability matter #2248742
    halloweene
    Participant

    Nope…

    Should I?

    I think you should

    During our assessments, we performed BVR and WVR engagements with the Mirage 2000 C RDI (analyzed in more detail in Part 3 of this test), where we had the opportunity to confirm the combination of the sensibility of SPECTRA EW with the all-aspect launching and target acquisition of MICA IR. This allowed us to designate the target from any source (EM / IR / Laser Threat Detection – Electromagnetic Threat Detection / Infrared / Laser), when the security bubble around the Rafale was invad-ed, and to execute the missile launch “over the shoulder.” Over the shoulder means that a MICA can be fired at a target located at position six o’clock (behind the aircraft) without changing flight direction.

    http://www.defesanet.com.br/rafale/noticia/10893/Shooting-Down-an-Aggressor-on-My-Six–Vive-la-difference-/

    Not sure any other operational fighter can do that yet. (should come with F35 and Gripen NG)

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2248950
    halloweene
    Participant

    Ok I don’t know. Maybe both has got similar technology. More sensors doesn’t mean more advanced or newer technology, and real infos about such a sensors are always classified, thus comparsion is very difficult.

    Not really in the case of Rafale if you take time to dig… However roughly the same pixel number to an EODAS sensor. (But 2 instead of 6)

    in reply to: India- PAK-FA or Rafale??? #2249058
    halloweene
    Participant

    …and to think people complain about Lockheed Martin or Sukhoi’s marketing. :very_drunk:

    I am sure this is news to the EA-18Gs that were operating off the coast…

    Look the bottom line is that the Rafale is an excellent plane. I have never asserted otherwise, but spare me the ridiculous marketing. If Rafale proved it was the “best all-round fighter in service anywhere” over Libya, imagine what it might have proven if the Libyans fighters had actually taken off. :eagerness:

    EA18 Gs weren’t operating of the coast first days. And later their help was denied due to a risk of interferences with spectra.
    Of course it is a PR publication, i mentioned it didn’t i? There are other mentions but nvm….

    in reply to: What metrics of Agility and Maneuverability matter #2249231
    halloweene
    Participant

    Will HOBS IR AAMs mean anything within a 5 mile sphere of an aircraft with HMS is dead?

    Did you read Viannet Riller test of Rafale on Defesanet?

    in reply to: What metrics of Agility and Maneuverability matter #2249234
    halloweene
    Participant

    my bad

    in reply to: What metrics of Agility and Maneuverability matter #2249288
    halloweene
    Participant

    In fact, time to bank would be more accurate than 360° roll rate.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2249350
    halloweene
    Participant

    I agree about the 6 sensors, but i’m far from sure that each sensor is older tech.

    Just looked at this picture… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1NrFZddihQ
    3/4 th of it (the engagement) is exactly what did vianney riller junior during his test of Rafale…

    in reply to: India- PAK-FA or Rafale??? #2249353
    halloweene
    Participant

    for those interested, Dassault fox three magazine about Lybia operations.

    http://www.dassault-aviation.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2012/08/FoxThree_Fox15.pdf

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2249364
    halloweene
    Participant

    360° would have been better, but would have needed rewiring planes in order to add a third sensor. It was scheduled as a “plug and play” replacement of previous DDM but has interesting capabilities (infrared fish eye optics arent so numerous, are they?

    Integrated fisheye optics yield 360-degree IR images

    Chatenay-Malabry and Palaiseau, France–Infrared (IR) detection company Sofradir and Onera, a center of excellence for aerospace and defense research, have developed a new IR detector with integrated fisheye optics based on Sofradir’s mercury cadmium telluride (MCT/HgCdTe) technology that features built-in 360 degree imaging. Previously, systems could only offer 360 degree imaging by using separate optical components. The new product will help producers of missile-warning systems reduce the size of the associated optical sensors and also make them more robust.

    “Sofradir and Onera are delighted to announce this new IR detector with integrated Fisheye optics for 360 degree imaging that meets defense market demands for more compact equipment,” said Philippe Bensussan, chairman and CEO of Sofradir. “This product marks another important step in Sofradir’s drive to bring customers best-in-class solutions, so that they can develop even smaller and better performing imaging systems.”

    The direct integration of 360 degree imaging lenses into the IR detector offers several benefits. First, the number of optical components is reduced. As a result, the camera’s optical transmission is increased. This, in turn, improves the camera’s sensitivity, a key feature in the performance of IR cameras. By embedding the imaging lens into the cooling chamber, Sofradir and Onera have kept stray light to a minimum. The ability to minimize stray light means that the thermal response and the background current are more stable. This extra stability reduces the need to correct non-uniformity, a weakness that occurs in standard IR cameras.

    Missile warning systems are used on selected aircraft to notify the pilot of threats and to trigger the aircraft’s countermeasures systems. They consist of a number of optical sensor converters, a computer processor, and a control indicator. Each optical converter houses an infrared camera.

    Sofradir (http://www.sofradir.com) develops and manufactures advanced infrared detectors (IR) for military, space and commercial applications. Sofradir also offers QWIP detectors developed in cooperation with Thales. Together Sofradir, ULIS, and Sofradir EC employ more than 500 people.

    Onera (http://www.onera.fr) is the leading aerospace and defense research organization in France. A public establishment created in 1946, it reports to the French Ministry of Defense. Onera has over 2,000 employees at eight major facilities, including 1,500 scientists, engineers and technicians, including 220 doctoral candidates and post-doc researchers. In 2009, Onera had revenues of 210 million euros.

    And no it has IIRC capability, the photos you saw are extracted from a picture btw. And as stated in the article, it is capable to generate/reinforce fused tracks fon other planes (it was used to perform a passive shooting in 6 o’clock, remember). So no, it

    It doesn’t bring exactly the same capabilities as EODAS (see through the plane on a helmet), but is definitely more than a pitched up MAWS.

    @ff, in what wat EODAS is newer???

    in reply to: India- PAK-FA or Rafale??? #2249805
    halloweene
    Participant

    For the sake of precision, inventory of lybian air force and defenses

    that Lybia had no air force is a bit exagerated. Here is the theorical composition of lybian air force at the beginning of conflict (many of these planes werent operational, i admit)
    around 375 planes :
    – 1 bomber squad (6 TU22)
    – 9 fighter squads (15 Mirage F1 ED, 94 Mig 25, 75 Mig 23, 45 Mig 21, 3 Mirage F1 BD, 3 Mig 25U
    – 7 fighter/bomber squads (6 SU24 MK D, 14 Mirage F1 AD, 40 Mig 23 BN, 53 su17M2/SU20 , 15 Mig 23U
    – 2 reco squads (7 Mig25R, 4 Mirage 5DP30
    – unknown (to me) exact number of Hind Mi 25D and Mi35

    Air defense : (5 regions)
    – 3 brigades (each 20-24 SA6 or SA8)
    – 2-3 brigades (12 SA3 each)
    – 5-6 brigades with 18 SA2 each
    – 4 brigades using SA5A (1 radar and 6 lauchers each)
    – 4+ batallions anti aerial artillery

    Not top of the notch inventory, but def not nothing.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2250108
    halloweene
    Participant

    Rafale = $120+ m

    Which price, fly away, procurement, life cycle????
    Complete fantasy price btw

    in reply to: India- PAK-FA or Rafale??? #2250541
    halloweene
    Participant

    Let it go boy…. In the meanwhile…

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2250775
    halloweene
    Participant

    Thats true, dont expect more before MLU because it would imply rewiring the plane.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,836 through 2,850 (of 4,136 total)