dark light

halloweene

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 4,136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2111167
    halloweene
    Participant

    i do not mean anything like that. I have seen it fly 5 times. Did you? I just mean that in order to fly slow F-35 A need high AoA, which is not necessarily the case of Russian or European planes. Landing speedis an indicator (among others) on how a plane will behave at slow speed.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2111177
    halloweene
    Participant

    The Rafale can’t reach ~40% of the AoA domain an F-35 can. EoA.

    So what? Best way to lose energy. F-35 (apart from C) is unable to fly slowly out of very high AoA due to small wings. Eurocanards or F-18 can. EOS

    in reply to: UK's new Tempest fighter ! #2111179
    halloweene
    Participant

    Three flows engine seem revolutionary for you? See Tornado. Whatever dump valve, “souris” etc. An adaptative cycle is an adpatative cycle.No less no more.

    in reply to: UK's new Tempest fighter ! #2111185
    halloweene
    Participant

    all of them have adaptative cycle using different systems. Kaveri being a special case, its third flux being used ot have a flat rate whatever speed or altitude.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2111188
    halloweene
    Participant

    Ha, was just gonna write the exact same thing spud. It may not be full/full. But they’ve stated full internal weapons load specifically several times. Recent article, forget which aviation magazine, had pilot stating limits with full fuel below 9G, until some fuel burned off. The B/C can reach their g-limits or 7.5/7 with full fuel and weapons (stated in previous DOT&E).

    Why speaking about Rafale centric world when you come from F-35 centric world? The idea is that Rhino and Rafale do not NEED very high AoA to be manoeuvrable at low speed. Again, i put the C version of F-35 apart.
    Btw, normal approach speed of Rafale in 15T configuration is 120 kts.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2111562
    halloweene
    Participant

    You consider a 155-160 knot approach speed fast? The F-16’s in the 140 knot range for a lightly loaded aircraft.

    Whatabout eurocanards?

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2111582
    halloweene
    Participant

    I’m ducious about one point. If F-35 is so manouvrable at slow speed, why doese it have such a high landing speed? (maybe not C)

    halloweene
    Participant

    There is video out there supposedly showing a JF-17 in pursuit of a MKI. I have seen it in much higher resolution, and the first fighter is most definitely not a MKI. My first impression was it was two JF-17s, flying close to the LOC. I’ll try to dig more info as to where exactly that vid was recorded over the coming days and will share.

    both fighters are F-15 in this video.

    halloweene
    Participant

    Pardon to play the devil’s advocate, but so far and regardless all dirty propaganda from both sides, the only CONFIRMED loss or kill is a MiG-21 Bison. Neither the Su-30MKK as claimed by the Pakistani nor the F-16 as claimed by the Indians is confirmed.

    i can fully understand both sides that in mind of nationalistic fewer the sense to facts get lost, but again, so far none of these claims was confirmed by evidence and pictorial facts nor by any independent third party. :confused:

    Anyway greek already killed a turkish F-16

    in reply to: UK's new Tempest fighter ! #2112344
    halloweene
    Participant

    ACE is far from a new thing tbh. Reinventing wheel… see M53, J79, or even Kaveri etc.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2112347
    halloweene
    Participant

    Ridiculous. Honestly. “it sucks to be you” looks like schoolyard language.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2112381
    halloweene
    Participant

    Airbus should not have been authorized to bid so low

    Sorry? Are you kidding? voyagers are working fine thank you, of course they had delays as every or so other planes, but they did not use money from the bid to design a specific civil airplane before designing the KC version, hence their capabilities to propose a cheaper and more efficient plane. What is your problem with european products ? personal?

    in reply to: Franco-German next generation fighter #2112391
    halloweene
    Participant

    With all due respect, that is not accurate, for example a compressed pulse consist of many sub pulses at different frequencies = radar can change frequency before it receive the returns.

    point is you do not have to cancle the whole signal, just mess it up enough to be non significant.

    in reply to: Franco-German next generation fighter #2112396
    halloweene
    Participant

    What is your problem with Dassault (they will deliver 26 Rafale next year btw).?

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2112401
    halloweene
    Participant

    Let’s wait for dust to down?

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 4,136 total)