you don’t recognise one of your heroes? …they [whoever they are that did the vid] can’t know too much if they have to use Kopp and his stuff from 33sec
Your daily insult at journalists? Who are you tobe so arrogant?
Cheers halloweene, taken at La Ferte Alias? Missed it this year 🙁
yes 😉
Tch sheet
PERFORMANCE
Range @ Mach 0.80
(8 pax, 3 crew, NBAA IFR reserves, ISA, full fuel)
5,200 nm / 9,630 km
MMO (Maximum Operating Mach Number) Mach .90
Max. Certified Altitude 51,000 ft / 15,545 m
Balanced Field Length
(MTOW, SL, ISA)
5,250 ft / 1,600 m
Approach Speed (Vref)
(Typical Landing Weight, SL)
105 kias / 194 km/h
WEIGHTS/CAPACITIES
Max. Ramp Weight 69,800 lb / 31,660 kg
Max. Take Off Weight 69,600 lb / 31,570 kg
Max. Landing Weight 66,100 lb / 29,980 kg
Maximum Zero Fuel Weight 43,500 lb / 19,730 kg
Max. Fuel Weight 28,200 lb / 12,790 kg
ENGINES & AVIONICS
2 Silvercrest Safran-Snecma – 11,450 lb / 5,100 daN (Max. thrust at SL – ISA)
EASy Flight Deck (with Honeywell Primus Epic System)
EXTERNAL DIMENSIONS CABIN DIMENSIONS
Height 24 ft 6 in / 7.5 m Cabin Length 38 ft 8 in 11.79 m
Length Overall 82 ft 7 in / 25.2 m Cabin Height 78 in 1.98 m
Wing Span 85 ft 1 in / 25.9 m Cabin Width 102 in 2.58 m
Cabin Volume 1,770 ft3
50 m3
Baggage Volume 155 ft3
4.4 m3
If you didn’t build strawmen and attempt to mis-represent my comments to fit your agenda i’d happily not feel moved to comment.
However the fact is you along with many other pro F35 chaps do attempt to build strawmen and mis-represent many things including my position and comments.
Cease that activity and i’ll not comment on it.
At no point have i “not admitted industrial benefits to the UK,” my position was rather more subtle than your attempted mis-representation of it.
This is typical of the F35 gang in that anything that is not full on Hoo Rah F35 F35 F35 USA USA USA gets labeled as “anti” or negative. I wonder whether is is due to a lack of comprehension ability or deliberate as the reality is not comfortable so requires suppression if the belief is to be maintained.
I’d be interested in your honest assessment or opinon of the reasons the F35 is the best choice for nations excluding the US, if those nations are not simply looking to “buy” US protection.
For u snafu
[ATTACH=CONFIG]222201[/ATTACH]
only 3 “the sky is falling wack jobs’ you guys need to put up more links
Uh? No idea about what you mean
Really? I think this photo shows otherwise, 36 EPW2 off one airframe. It also carries its own Lightning III for self designating. There were targets out there that needed 1000lb bombs as the PWIV just wasn’t upto the task. Now that EPW2 and PWII has been withdrawn from the RTS for Tornado, only the Typhoon can carry them.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]222162[/ATTACH]
Nice improvements, but still far from competitors capabilities
Bite tour tongue, an anonymous blogger called picard578 is about as good as it gets.
Picard isnt really anonymous, Croatian guy, justvask him….
Let me sum up, in 3 days, jackster insulted sweetman, mc pheird, majumdar (did i forget any? Jon Lake?)
Wrong, i’m french. But i still think P8A isgood, specially in US environment.
I’m not mysterious, but i cant quote someone without his ok. Will ask.
The Rafale and Eurofighter for instance both suffered cracking during their durability testing. Do you know how I know this? Because unless you over-engineer your airframe to a ridiculous extent cracks are inevitable by the time an airframe reaches its design life… but where are the stories about this? As for schedule slips, budget overruns, etc, we don’t really need to compare the F-35 to the Rafale and Eurofighter again do we?
All in all you guess something then assert is as a truth.
The very story was told to me by head engineer of combat systems of one of the contenders, believe it or not, P3 was crappy
Audition of MoD by Assemblée Nationale… (google translation, i’m lazy)
Mr. Folliot, the White Paper states that the fighter aircraft will have 225 aircraft in 2025. To achieve this will require Rafale and Mirage 2000 D renovated. The draft LPM provides control of 26 Rafale – 11 in 2014, 11 in 2015 and four in 2016. We will have to eventually replace the Mirage 2000, also does not order the 2016 does mark the end of the commands of Rafale. The text also provides for the development of the new F3R standard Rafale cause an expenditure of € 1.1 billion, which must be added 700 million for the aircraft of the future – namely the UCAV that n ‘is at present at the stage of studies.
I am convinced that we will succeed and, in 2014, we know a successful export. If this was not the case would proceed to a revision in 2015.
I was talking about P3, not P8. P8 is an excellent plane for USN, and all its assets (eg mad done by launchable items)
Fair enough. I didn’t say Transonic and top speed was that important eighter. For RAAF Requirements, extra range would seem like the most important performance operating out at their wast Sea Territory.
Much the same as With Norway b.t.w.On a different note, how is the A2G(anti ship) missile coming along for RAAF?
Have they decided which missile they’ll going for?
At the moment the JSM looking good..
So basically RAAF need long range strikers and keep buying short legged planes????