dark light

halloweene

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,466 through 3,480 (of 4,136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News and Updates #2271796
    halloweene
    Participant

    @memalaya Not really, it is a report of RAF officers conference at RIAT

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News and Updates #2271980
    halloweene
    Participant

    /mode troll on ask Dassault to make a pitch for Rafale? /mode troll off

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News and Updates #2271983
    halloweene
    Participant

    AESA coming also on RAfale M , but only a detail.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2272059
    halloweene
    Participant

    And the rafale doing big lames and smoking? Dunno what jsr smoked to claim that…

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2272068
    halloweene
    Participant

    Hmmm shall i answer and feed the troll

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News and Updates #2272222
    halloweene
    Participant

    Gentlemen
    What about leaving the troll starving? Didn’t daddy tell you chaps: “Don’t feed the troll!”? Use the ignore list or simply don’t read the badnwith robbery, but don’t throw more food at the tmeh scorp, you just liroll, otherwise you’ll just attract him to come back!

    WRT the ongoing discussion, well it’s obvious that arguments are going pass each other. Why? Maybe because the points raised are simply not too well understood by either side. People look at the evolution roadmap that Eurofighter has outlined over a decade ago and they measure the actual progress against that roadmap. Viz a viz that roadmap the Typhoon is far behind the curve, what’s being ignored in the first place here is that:
    1.) That roadmap was just an industry concept that was never commited to or funded by the customers!
    2.) That roadmap thus never existed in the first place as a firm plan and is long obsolete either!

    At the end of the day it is as it is. It’s not like other aircraft are looking exactly like what has been proposed they could look like at this time frame! I’ll restrain myself from bringing up any particular examples as I already know how this would end up…

    Considering the roadmap proposed more than a decade ago it’s not surprising that many confuse tranches and blocks with capability standards, however they should know better as this subject has been covered countless times. I’m for my part increasingly tired to repeat myselfs, so let the dumb die the way they are. It’s not worth the effort!

    One additional remark: Modern combat aircraft capability is largely driven by software, measuring the “progress” made by what you can see on the outside just demonstrates that most of the laymen here have simply no clue and insight into how things work and if they would actually know what hardware changes the Typhoon programmes has experienced from block 1 to the latest block 15, they would actually laughing out loud at statements like “the aircraft is at it was 10 years ago and hasn’t changed a bit”. Argueably there is a LOT that isn’t covered in the public domain for good reason, but there is enough out there to get an idea. However this requires some dedication and effort that people usually lack wrt aircraft that they aren’t primarily interested in.

    Just my 2 ct

    Meh scorp u just killed my drop6 trolling capability, unfair!

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2013 #2272387
    halloweene
    Participant
    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2272525
    halloweene
    Participant

    By sheer memory, i did a mistake : 7 countries but 5 plants afaik , thales, qinetiq, ums, finmecanicca and a sweden one. Plz notice this is by memory, not after extensive research.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2272563
    halloweene
    Participant

    You should find infos researching about korrigan, manga and eusic programs. Since Lybia, and mali, anyone have doubts about the capability of rafale to operate in hot environment??? Btw no use linking me thhe demo of s35, i have seen it 3 times irl… And it used afterburner.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2272660
    halloweene
    Participant

    90 seats turbopropeller program is included in european “Clean Sky 2”

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2272663
    halloweene
    Participant

    Wow lots of posts! When i said certified, i meant able to produce them and able to offer them for military programs (that was after a huge european program, i dont remember the name). Among these plants there is british QinetiQ btw…Thx for infos.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2272752
    halloweene
    Participant

    I know, btw 7 plants are certfied in europe. Why this tec isnt used on F35?

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2272783
    halloweene
    Participant

    Btw, replacement of alq99 will use GaN electronics…French way?

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2272785
    halloweene
    Participant

    Seen Rafale several times. At low speeds the bird is visibly more agile than Typhoon, even Su-27.
    Purely subjectively speaking…

    Different handling qualities…

    in reply to: Future RAF – Mixed Fighter Force re born #2272786
    halloweene
    Participant

    Britain IS going to hi lo mix… In terms of altitude, not capabilities…

Viewing 15 posts - 3,466 through 3,480 (of 4,136 total)