dark light

halloweene

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,631 through 3,645 (of 4,136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-16 Air to Air Kills. #2256516
    halloweene
    Participant

    no Greek M2K

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News and Updates #2256589
    halloweene
    Participant

    2013 demo at Cosford.

    halloweene
    Participant

    French stuff is so poor that russia is buying BPCs :applause:

    in reply to: F-16 Air to Air Kills. #2256689
    halloweene
    Participant

    Afaik only one in A2A in1996 over Aegean Sea

    in reply to: AIM-120 range questions #1789944
    halloweene
    Participant

    MBDA also studuing dual pulse for an improved mica.

    halloweene
    Participant

    Anyone knows the exact date of Roussef visit to USA?

    in reply to: General UCAV/UAV discussion – A New Hope #2257015
    halloweene
    Participant

    The right attitude would be the us one imho : let designs compete, give head of project to the winning one but assuring industrila parts to other contenders.

    in reply to: F-35 Debate thread (2) #2257023
    halloweene
    Participant

    Recently, MBDA did a conference about the future of long distance engagements (btw they consider pk as low). The pdf was classified, but clearly they think the most important improvement path is evasive manoeuvers modelling. for predicitive models.

    in reply to: Size of the new 5th gen fighters…too big !? #2257203
    halloweene
    Participant

    OMGZ going to hit bed!

    in reply to: F-35 Debate thread (2) #2257206
    halloweene
    Participant

    V. Point is , is it relevant for short range missile?

    in reply to: F-35 Debate thread (2) #2257218
    halloweene
    Participant

    Why don’t you plot that out on a graphical chart, add the air density in that chart (needed for drag) and look at what angles you end up with. The lofted profile is only good for the very long range and low Pk engagements.

    You have propulsion for 11km.
    It needs a vertical change in position of 3km minimum to have any form of useful range extension, preferably even more. But everything after the 11km is a glide flight where over 50% of the agility is lost already. And after something like 2-5 seconds of sharp turning it has lost nearly 50% of its velocity and even more of its turn performance (and thats the result of a target doing zig-zag or yo-yo).

    There are very good reasons why engagement envelopes look like this:
    http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/9017/r772.jpg

    The one exception today is the Meteor but it has very little information regarding actual performance. Its even possible that an AIM120D can hit slow targets at a greater distance due to lower drag. Another exception may be the MICA NG, currently in development… and Python 5 that has a very very long sustainer. But the Python 5 has the sustainer to maintain some agility, not to have enough speed to chase down a target.

    MICA NG is only technological bricks dev atm. Lets hope dual booster will be finally developed.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2257221
    halloweene
    Participant

    270° at 350 NM but if you look a bit earlier on topic you will see demo 2013, or shall i post it again?

    in reply to: AIM-9x vs AIM-120 #1789955
    halloweene
    Participant

    i think you’ll be interested in that mica shot… (already postd in another thread) : 6 o’clock using passive sensors and spectra only…

    http://www.defesanet.com.br/photo/defesanet/over_the_shoulder.jpg

    in reply to: JF-17 vs Mirage F-1 ASTRAC #2257242
    halloweene
    Participant

    Btw, Morrocan airforce seem fairly satisfied with their F1 M2000

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2257250
    halloweene
    Participant

    NP, i’m no Dassault seller 😉

    Yves

Viewing 15 posts - 3,631 through 3,645 (of 4,136 total)